{"title":"3-6 岁发育正常儿童精细动作技能表现随年龄的定性变化","authors":"Leila Faber , Marina M. Schoemaker , Dagmar F.A.A. Derikx , Heleen Seetsen- van Schelven , Esther Hartman , Suzanne Houwen","doi":"10.1016/j.humov.2023.103169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study described intra-task fine motor skill components of the Manual Dexterity tasks (Posting Coins; PC, Threading Beads; TB, Drawing Trail; DT) of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 Test for typically developing children and investigated age- and sex-related differences. Three- to six-year-old Dutch children (<em>n</em> = 182, M<sub>age</sub> 4.5 ± 1.1 years, 51.1% boys) were observed with regard to intra-task fine motor skill components, and changes in intra-task components of the Manual Dexterity tasks were analyzed across age using of the Kruskal–Wallis test with post-hoc Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> tests, and differences between sexes using the Mann–Whitney U test. The following intra-task components were observed: grip type, manipulation, non-dominant or non-writing hand, grip position, posture, head, coin placement, placement of the bead on the lace tip and joint movement. Results showed that the younger children (3-year-olds) more frequently used a grasp with the full hand (PC, TB), more often put the coin on the container and sliding it in (PC), more often supported the side or top of the container (PC), used more bi-manual manipulation (transferring from hand-to-hand or hand, body or surface assist) (TB, DT), more frequently used primitive, too high grips, predominantly used their proximal joints, and did not support the paper (DT). This in comparison with more frequent use of three-point pinch, direct coin placement, grabbing the front or back of the container, in-hand-manipulation, mature grips and correct height, distal joint use and supporting the paper from the side or below by most 5- and 6-year-olds. Furthermore, most sex-related differences were found in the younger age-groups (3- and 4-year-olds) in the DT tasks with girls outperforming boys. Results from this study add to the knowledge on qualitative fine motor skill performance in a convenience sample of 3- to 6-year-old typically developing children. A limitation of the current study was the relatively small sample size of 6-year-old children. The strength of the current study is its novelty in providing qualitative descriptions of intra-task fine motor skill components in typically developing 3- to 6-year-old children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55046,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016794572300115X/pdfft?md5=cf95055d0eac16d0c3df5141477a9e7d&pid=1-s2.0-S016794572300115X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative age-related changes in fine motor skill performance among 3- to 6-year-old typically developing children\",\"authors\":\"Leila Faber , Marina M. Schoemaker , Dagmar F.A.A. Derikx , Heleen Seetsen- van Schelven , Esther Hartman , Suzanne Houwen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.humov.2023.103169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study described intra-task fine motor skill components of the Manual Dexterity tasks (Posting Coins; PC, Threading Beads; TB, Drawing Trail; DT) of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 Test for typically developing children and investigated age- and sex-related differences. Three- to six-year-old Dutch children (<em>n</em> = 182, M<sub>age</sub> 4.5 ± 1.1 years, 51.1% boys) were observed with regard to intra-task fine motor skill components, and changes in intra-task components of the Manual Dexterity tasks were analyzed across age using of the Kruskal–Wallis test with post-hoc Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> tests, and differences between sexes using the Mann–Whitney U test. The following intra-task components were observed: grip type, manipulation, non-dominant or non-writing hand, grip position, posture, head, coin placement, placement of the bead on the lace tip and joint movement. Results showed that the younger children (3-year-olds) more frequently used a grasp with the full hand (PC, TB), more often put the coin on the container and sliding it in (PC), more often supported the side or top of the container (PC), used more bi-manual manipulation (transferring from hand-to-hand or hand, body or surface assist) (TB, DT), more frequently used primitive, too high grips, predominantly used their proximal joints, and did not support the paper (DT). This in comparison with more frequent use of three-point pinch, direct coin placement, grabbing the front or back of the container, in-hand-manipulation, mature grips and correct height, distal joint use and supporting the paper from the side or below by most 5- and 6-year-olds. Furthermore, most sex-related differences were found in the younger age-groups (3- and 4-year-olds) in the DT tasks with girls outperforming boys. Results from this study add to the knowledge on qualitative fine motor skill performance in a convenience sample of 3- to 6-year-old typically developing children. A limitation of the current study was the relatively small sample size of 6-year-old children. The strength of the current study is its novelty in providing qualitative descriptions of intra-task fine motor skill components in typically developing 3- to 6-year-old children.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Movement Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016794572300115X/pdfft?md5=cf95055d0eac16d0c3df5141477a9e7d&pid=1-s2.0-S016794572300115X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Movement Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016794572300115X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016794572300115X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Qualitative age-related changes in fine motor skill performance among 3- to 6-year-old typically developing children
This study described intra-task fine motor skill components of the Manual Dexterity tasks (Posting Coins; PC, Threading Beads; TB, Drawing Trail; DT) of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 Test for typically developing children and investigated age- and sex-related differences. Three- to six-year-old Dutch children (n = 182, Mage 4.5 ± 1.1 years, 51.1% boys) were observed with regard to intra-task fine motor skill components, and changes in intra-task components of the Manual Dexterity tasks were analyzed across age using of the Kruskal–Wallis test with post-hoc Mann–Whitney U tests, and differences between sexes using the Mann–Whitney U test. The following intra-task components were observed: grip type, manipulation, non-dominant or non-writing hand, grip position, posture, head, coin placement, placement of the bead on the lace tip and joint movement. Results showed that the younger children (3-year-olds) more frequently used a grasp with the full hand (PC, TB), more often put the coin on the container and sliding it in (PC), more often supported the side or top of the container (PC), used more bi-manual manipulation (transferring from hand-to-hand or hand, body or surface assist) (TB, DT), more frequently used primitive, too high grips, predominantly used their proximal joints, and did not support the paper (DT). This in comparison with more frequent use of three-point pinch, direct coin placement, grabbing the front or back of the container, in-hand-manipulation, mature grips and correct height, distal joint use and supporting the paper from the side or below by most 5- and 6-year-olds. Furthermore, most sex-related differences were found in the younger age-groups (3- and 4-year-olds) in the DT tasks with girls outperforming boys. Results from this study add to the knowledge on qualitative fine motor skill performance in a convenience sample of 3- to 6-year-old typically developing children. A limitation of the current study was the relatively small sample size of 6-year-old children. The strength of the current study is its novelty in providing qualitative descriptions of intra-task fine motor skill components in typically developing 3- to 6-year-old children.
期刊介绍:
Human Movement Science provides a medium for publishing disciplinary and multidisciplinary studies on human movement. It brings together psychological, biomechanical and neurophysiological research on the control, organization and learning of human movement, including the perceptual support of movement. The overarching goal of the journal is to publish articles that help advance theoretical understanding of the control and organization of human movement, as well as changes therein as a function of development, learning and rehabilitation. The nature of the research reported may vary from fundamental theoretical or empirical studies to more applied studies in the fields of, for example, sport, dance and rehabilitation with the proviso that all studies have a distinct theoretical bearing. Also, reviews and meta-studies advancing the understanding of human movement are welcome.
These aims and scope imply that purely descriptive studies are not acceptable, while methodological articles are only acceptable if the methodology in question opens up new vistas in understanding the control and organization of human movement. The same holds for articles on exercise physiology, which in general are not supported, unless they speak to the control and organization of human movement. In general, it is required that the theoretical message of articles published in Human Movement Science is, to a certain extent, innovative and not dismissible as just "more of the same."