加纳霍市 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的相关因素:横断面研究

Stanley Kofi Alor , Irene M. Akwo Kretchy , Franklin N. Glozah , Philip Baba Adongo
{"title":"加纳霍市 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的相关因素:横断面研究","authors":"Stanley Kofi Alor ,&nbsp;Irene M. Akwo Kretchy ,&nbsp;Franklin N. Glozah ,&nbsp;Philip Baba Adongo","doi":"10.1016/j.metop.2023.100265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the status of glycaemic control and associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a hospital-based cross-sectional descriptive study of 326 patients with type 2 diabetes at the Ho Municipal and Teaching Hospitals. The adequate sample size was calculated using Yamane formula N/1 + Ne<sup>2</sup>, with 95 % confidence interval, 5 % margin of error and 10 % non-response rate and a sample size of 326 was determined. Using the sampling frame of patients chart, systematic random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Glycaemic level was assessed using fasting blood glucose (FBG) readings. A poor glycaemic control was when an average of three months blood glucose level was above 130 mg/dl (7 mm/L). Data was analysed using STATA version 15.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 310 patients who participated in the study, more than two-thirds (76.1 %) had poor glycaemic control. Patients who use combination of oral medication and insulin (AOR = 3.67, 95 % CI: 1.34–8.74), patients with diabetes for 16 years or more (AOR = 4.67, 95 % CI: 2.44–9.29), patients who did not practised diabetes self-care activities (AOR = 4.32, 95 % CI: 2.82–9.31) and patients with complications were (AOR = 2.47, 95%CI: 1.45–8.66) more likely to have poor glycaemic control. Age, employment, diabetes education, comorbidities, diabetes self-care activities, treatment type, complications, resident and duration of diabetes were significantly associated with poor glycaemic control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on this findings, teaching and counselling provided by nurses, physicians, dietitians and pharmacists should focus on improving adherence to diabetes self-care activities to attain good glycaemic control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94141,"journal":{"name":"Metabolism open","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936823000373/pdfft?md5=380bc31344fcef13bc650c876f5ae8ca&pid=1-s2.0-S2589936823000373-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Ho, Ghana: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Stanley Kofi Alor ,&nbsp;Irene M. Akwo Kretchy ,&nbsp;Franklin N. Glozah ,&nbsp;Philip Baba Adongo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.metop.2023.100265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the status of glycaemic control and associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a hospital-based cross-sectional descriptive study of 326 patients with type 2 diabetes at the Ho Municipal and Teaching Hospitals. The adequate sample size was calculated using Yamane formula N/1 + Ne<sup>2</sup>, with 95 % confidence interval, 5 % margin of error and 10 % non-response rate and a sample size of 326 was determined. Using the sampling frame of patients chart, systematic random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Glycaemic level was assessed using fasting blood glucose (FBG) readings. A poor glycaemic control was when an average of three months blood glucose level was above 130 mg/dl (7 mm/L). Data was analysed using STATA version 15.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 310 patients who participated in the study, more than two-thirds (76.1 %) had poor glycaemic control. Patients who use combination of oral medication and insulin (AOR = 3.67, 95 % CI: 1.34–8.74), patients with diabetes for 16 years or more (AOR = 4.67, 95 % CI: 2.44–9.29), patients who did not practised diabetes self-care activities (AOR = 4.32, 95 % CI: 2.82–9.31) and patients with complications were (AOR = 2.47, 95%CI: 1.45–8.66) more likely to have poor glycaemic control. Age, employment, diabetes education, comorbidities, diabetes self-care activities, treatment type, complications, resident and duration of diabetes were significantly associated with poor glycaemic control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on this findings, teaching and counselling provided by nurses, physicians, dietitians and pharmacists should focus on improving adherence to diabetes self-care activities to attain good glycaemic control.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metabolism open\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936823000373/pdfft?md5=380bc31344fcef13bc650c876f5ae8ca&pid=1-s2.0-S2589936823000373-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metabolism open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936823000373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolism open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936823000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景这项研究的目的是评估 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制状况和相关因素。方法这是一项以医院为基础的横断面描述性研究,研究对象是何市教学医院的 326 名 2 型糖尿病患者。采用山根公式 N/1 + Ne2 计算足够的样本量,置信区间为 95%,误差率为 5%,非响应率为 10%,最终确定样本量为 326 人。利用患者病历抽样框架,采用系统随机抽样技术选取研究参与者。血糖水平通过空腹血糖 (FBG) 读数进行评估。三个月的平均血糖水平超过 130 毫克/分升(7 毫米/升)即为血糖控制不良。结果在参与研究的 310 名患者中,超过三分之二(76.1%)的患者血糖控制不佳。联合使用口服药物和胰岛素的患者(AOR = 3.67,95 % CI:1.34-8.74)、糖尿病病程达 16 年或以上的患者(AOR = 4.67,95 % CI:2.44-9.29)、没有进行糖尿病自我护理活动的患者(AOR = 4.32,95 % CI:2.82-9.31)和有并发症的患者(AOR = 2.47,95 % CI:1.45-8.66)更容易出现血糖控制不佳的情况。年龄、就业、糖尿病教育、合并症、糖尿病自我护理活动、治疗类型、并发症、常住居民和糖尿病病程与血糖控制不佳显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Ho, Ghana: A cross-sectional study

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess the status of glycaemic control and associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Methods

This was a hospital-based cross-sectional descriptive study of 326 patients with type 2 diabetes at the Ho Municipal and Teaching Hospitals. The adequate sample size was calculated using Yamane formula N/1 + Ne2, with 95 % confidence interval, 5 % margin of error and 10 % non-response rate and a sample size of 326 was determined. Using the sampling frame of patients chart, systematic random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Glycaemic level was assessed using fasting blood glucose (FBG) readings. A poor glycaemic control was when an average of three months blood glucose level was above 130 mg/dl (7 mm/L). Data was analysed using STATA version 15.0.

Results

Out of 310 patients who participated in the study, more than two-thirds (76.1 %) had poor glycaemic control. Patients who use combination of oral medication and insulin (AOR = 3.67, 95 % CI: 1.34–8.74), patients with diabetes for 16 years or more (AOR = 4.67, 95 % CI: 2.44–9.29), patients who did not practised diabetes self-care activities (AOR = 4.32, 95 % CI: 2.82–9.31) and patients with complications were (AOR = 2.47, 95%CI: 1.45–8.66) more likely to have poor glycaemic control. Age, employment, diabetes education, comorbidities, diabetes self-care activities, treatment type, complications, resident and duration of diabetes were significantly associated with poor glycaemic control.

Conclusion

Based on this findings, teaching and counselling provided by nurses, physicians, dietitians and pharmacists should focus on improving adherence to diabetes self-care activities to attain good glycaemic control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metabolism open
Metabolism open Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General), Endocrinology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信