中国老年病房中四种死亡率预测模型的验证与比较

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Interventions in Aging Pub Date : 2023-11-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CIA.S429769
Yuanyuan Li, Xiaohong Liu, Lin Kang, Jiaojiao Li
{"title":"中国老年病房中四种死亡率预测模型的验证与比较","authors":"Yuanyuan Li, Xiaohong Liu, Lin Kang, Jiaojiao Li","doi":"10.2147/CIA.S429769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The efficacy of mortality risk prediction models among older patients in China remains uncertain. We aimed to validate and compare the performances of the Walter Index, Geriatric Prognostic Index (GPI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and FRAIL Scale in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality post-discharge in geriatric inpatients in China.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was conducted at a geriatric ward of a tertiary Hospital in Beijing, including patients aged 70 years or older with a documented comprehensive geriatric assessment, discharged between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Patients with a hospital stay ≤24 h or >60 days were excluded. All-cause mortality data within one year of discharge were collected from medical files and telephone interviews between August 2022 and February 2023. Multiple imputation, Logistic regression analysis, Brier scores, C-statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit-test, and calibration plots were employed for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 832 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 77 (74-82) years. One-hundred patients (12.0%) died within one year. After adjusting for covariates-marital status, social support, cigarette use, length of stay, number of medications, hemoglobin levels, handgrip strength, and Short Physical Performance Battery-CCI scores of 3-4 and >4, and increased Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale scores were significantly associated with 1-year mortality risk. The Brier scores varied from 0.07 (Walter Index) to 0.10 (FRAIL Scale). The C-statistic ranged from 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.78) for FRAIL Scale to 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.91) for the Walter Index. Calibration curves showed that the Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale were well calibrated, while the CCI was poor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining the Brier score, discrimination and calibration, the Walter Index was confirmed for the first time to be the best model to predict the 1-year mortality risk of geriatric inpatients in China among the four models.</p>","PeriodicalId":48841,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Li, Xiaohong Liu, Lin Kang, Jiaojiao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CIA.S429769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The efficacy of mortality risk prediction models among older patients in China remains uncertain. We aimed to validate and compare the performances of the Walter Index, Geriatric Prognostic Index (GPI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and FRAIL Scale in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality post-discharge in geriatric inpatients in China.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was conducted at a geriatric ward of a tertiary Hospital in Beijing, including patients aged 70 years or older with a documented comprehensive geriatric assessment, discharged between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Patients with a hospital stay ≤24 h or >60 days were excluded. All-cause mortality data within one year of discharge were collected from medical files and telephone interviews between August 2022 and February 2023. Multiple imputation, Logistic regression analysis, Brier scores, C-statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit-test, and calibration plots were employed for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 832 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 77 (74-82) years. One-hundred patients (12.0%) died within one year. After adjusting for covariates-marital status, social support, cigarette use, length of stay, number of medications, hemoglobin levels, handgrip strength, and Short Physical Performance Battery-CCI scores of 3-4 and >4, and increased Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale scores were significantly associated with 1-year mortality risk. The Brier scores varied from 0.07 (Walter Index) to 0.10 (FRAIL Scale). The C-statistic ranged from 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.78) for FRAIL Scale to 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.91) for the Walter Index. Calibration curves showed that the Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale were well calibrated, while the CCI was poor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining the Brier score, discrimination and calibration, the Walter Index was confirmed for the first time to be the best model to predict the 1-year mortality risk of geriatric inpatients in China among the four models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S429769\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S429769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:中国老年患者死亡风险预测模型的有效性仍不确定。我们旨在验证并比较沃尔特指数(Walter Index)、老年预后指数(Geriatric Prognostic Index,GPI)、查尔森合并症指数(Charlson Comorbidity Index,CCI)和 FRAIL 量表在预测中国老年住院患者出院后 1 年全因死亡率方面的表现:本研究在北京一家三级甲等医院的老年病区进行,研究对象包括年龄在70岁或以上、有老年病综合评估记录、在2016年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间出院的患者。住院时间≤24小时或>60天的患者除外。2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 2 月期间,通过医疗档案和电话访谈收集出院一年内的全因死亡率数据。统计分析采用了多重估算、逻辑回归分析、Brier评分、C统计量、Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验和校准图:共纳入 832 名患者,中位数(四分位数间距)年龄为 77(74-82)岁。100名患者(12.0%)在一年内死亡。在对婚姻状况、社会支持、吸烟、住院时间、用药次数、血红蛋白水平、手握强度和短期体能测试等协变量进行调整后,CCI 评分为 3-4 分和大于 4 分以及沃尔特指数、GPI 和 FRAIL 量表评分增加与 1 年死亡风险显著相关。Brier 评分从 0.07(沃尔特指数)到 0.10(FRAIL 量表)不等。C统计量从FRAIL量表的0.74(95%置信区间,0.69-0.78)到沃尔特指数的0.88(95%置信区间,0.84-0.91)不等。校准曲线显示,Walter 指数、GPI 和 FRAIL 量表校准良好,而 CCI 则较差:结合布赖尔评分、区分度和校准,沃尔特指数首次被证实是四种模型中预测中国老年住院患者1年死亡风险的最佳模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China.

Purpose: The efficacy of mortality risk prediction models among older patients in China remains uncertain. We aimed to validate and compare the performances of the Walter Index, Geriatric Prognostic Index (GPI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and FRAIL Scale in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality post-discharge in geriatric inpatients in China.

Patients and methods: This study was conducted at a geriatric ward of a tertiary Hospital in Beijing, including patients aged 70 years or older with a documented comprehensive geriatric assessment, discharged between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Patients with a hospital stay ≤24 h or >60 days were excluded. All-cause mortality data within one year of discharge were collected from medical files and telephone interviews between August 2022 and February 2023. Multiple imputation, Logistic regression analysis, Brier scores, C-statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit-test, and calibration plots were employed for statistical analysis.

Results: We included 832 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 77 (74-82) years. One-hundred patients (12.0%) died within one year. After adjusting for covariates-marital status, social support, cigarette use, length of stay, number of medications, hemoglobin levels, handgrip strength, and Short Physical Performance Battery-CCI scores of 3-4 and >4, and increased Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale scores were significantly associated with 1-year mortality risk. The Brier scores varied from 0.07 (Walter Index) to 0.10 (FRAIL Scale). The C-statistic ranged from 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.78) for FRAIL Scale to 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.91) for the Walter Index. Calibration curves showed that the Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale were well calibrated, while the CCI was poor.

Conclusion: Combining the Brier score, discrimination and calibration, the Walter Index was confirmed for the first time to be the best model to predict the 1-year mortality risk of geriatric inpatients in China among the four models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Clinical Interventions in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信