在老年人样本中开发和验证基于刺激等效范式的简短数字认知测试。

Q3 Medicine
Dementia e Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2023-12-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0050
Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas, Andreza Gomes Spiller Nery, Ana Julia de Lima Bomfim, Natalia Mario Aggio
{"title":"在老年人样本中开发和验证基于刺激等效范式的简短数字认知测试。","authors":"Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas, Andreza Gomes Spiller Nery, Ana Julia de Lima Bomfim, Natalia Mario Aggio","doi":"10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the technological advancement and democratization of electronic devices, computerized cognitive tests have been increasingly used in the clinical context to evaluate cognitive performance in individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to propose a brief digital cognitive test based on the paradigm of stimulus equivalence and assess its convergent validity by comparing it with traditionally applied tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was carried out with a non-probabilistic sample of 50 older adults selected from a public call through the communication media, health units, and day centers of a city in the countryside of São Paulo. Participants were assessed by the brief digital cognitive test, Mini-Mental State Examination, Brief Cognitive Screening Battery, and the Five Digit Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean age of 71.23 years (standard deviation [SD]: ±9.36) and a mean of 7.15 years of schooling (SD: ±5.34). The mean time to answer the test was 5.33 minutes (SD: ±1.92). There were statistically significant correlations between traditional and digital tests in most domains evaluated. In addition, considering the total score of the digital test, the test could discriminate participants with and without cognitive impairment: area under the ROC curve=0.765; 95%CI 0.630-0.901.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The brief digital cognitive test, using the stimulus equivalence paradigm, is an easy-to-apply and valid instrument for the investigation of cognitive impairment in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":39167,"journal":{"name":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a brief digital cognitive test based on the paradigm of stimulus equivalence in a sample of older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas, Andreza Gomes Spiller Nery, Ana Julia de Lima Bomfim, Natalia Mario Aggio\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the technological advancement and democratization of electronic devices, computerized cognitive tests have been increasingly used in the clinical context to evaluate cognitive performance in individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to propose a brief digital cognitive test based on the paradigm of stimulus equivalence and assess its convergent validity by comparing it with traditionally applied tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was carried out with a non-probabilistic sample of 50 older adults selected from a public call through the communication media, health units, and day centers of a city in the countryside of São Paulo. Participants were assessed by the brief digital cognitive test, Mini-Mental State Examination, Brief Cognitive Screening Battery, and the Five Digit Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean age of 71.23 years (standard deviation [SD]: ±9.36) and a mean of 7.15 years of schooling (SD: ±5.34). The mean time to answer the test was 5.33 minutes (SD: ±1.92). There were statistically significant correlations between traditional and digital tests in most domains evaluated. In addition, considering the total score of the digital test, the test could discriminate participants with and without cognitive impairment: area under the ROC curve=0.765; 95%CI 0.630-0.901.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The brief digital cognitive test, using the stimulus equivalence paradigm, is an easy-to-apply and valid instrument for the investigation of cognitive impairment in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia e Neuropsychologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695439/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia e Neuropsychologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着技术的进步和电子设备的民主化,计算机化认知测试越来越多地被用于临床评估个人的认知表现:本研究旨在提出一种基于刺激等效范式的简短数字认知测试,并通过与传统应用测试的比较来评估其收敛效度:本研究采用非概率抽样的方式,通过传播媒体、医疗单位和圣保罗郊区某城市的日间中心公开征集 50 名老年人。参与者接受了简短数字认知测试、迷你精神状态检查、简短认知筛查电池和五位数测试的评估:参与者的平均年龄为 71.23 岁(标准差:±9.36),平均受教育年限为 7.15 年(标准差:±5.34)。回答测试题的平均时间为 5.33 分钟(标准差:±1.92)。在大多数评估领域,传统测试和数字测试之间都存在统计学意义上的相关性。此外,考虑到数字测试的总分,该测试可以区分有认知障碍和无认知障碍的参与者:ROC 曲线下面积=0.765;95%CI 0.630-0.901:使用刺激等效范式的简短数字认知测试是一种易于应用且有效的工具,可用于调查老年人的认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a brief digital cognitive test based on the paradigm of stimulus equivalence in a sample of older adults.

With the technological advancement and democratization of electronic devices, computerized cognitive tests have been increasingly used in the clinical context to evaluate cognitive performance in individuals.

Objective: This study aimed to propose a brief digital cognitive test based on the paradigm of stimulus equivalence and assess its convergent validity by comparing it with traditionally applied tests.

Methods: The study was carried out with a non-probabilistic sample of 50 older adults selected from a public call through the communication media, health units, and day centers of a city in the countryside of São Paulo. Participants were assessed by the brief digital cognitive test, Mini-Mental State Examination, Brief Cognitive Screening Battery, and the Five Digit Test.

Results: Participants had a mean age of 71.23 years (standard deviation [SD]: ±9.36) and a mean of 7.15 years of schooling (SD: ±5.34). The mean time to answer the test was 5.33 minutes (SD: ±1.92). There were statistically significant correlations between traditional and digital tests in most domains evaluated. In addition, considering the total score of the digital test, the test could discriminate participants with and without cognitive impairment: area under the ROC curve=0.765; 95%CI 0.630-0.901.

Conclusion: The brief digital cognitive test, using the stimulus equivalence paradigm, is an easy-to-apply and valid instrument for the investigation of cognitive impairment in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dementia e Neuropsychologia
Dementia e Neuropsychologia Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dementia top Neuropsychologia the official scientific journal of the Cognitive Neurology and Ageing Department of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology and of the Brazilian Association of Geriatric Neuropsychiatry, is published by the "Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento", a nonprofit Brazilian association. Regularly published on March, June, September, and December since 2007.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信