促进纯母乳喂养的干预措施对儿童结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1159/000535564
Sarah Dib, Frankie Joy Fair, Lucy Jane McCann, Antonia Nicholls, Anastasia Z Kalea, Hora Soltani, Mary Fewtrell
{"title":"促进纯母乳喂养的干预措施对儿童结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Sarah Dib, Frankie Joy Fair, Lucy Jane McCann, Antonia Nicholls, Anastasia Z Kalea, Hora Soltani, Mary Fewtrell","doi":"10.1159/000535564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interventions promoting exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) may benefit infant health outcomes, but evidence is inconsistent. The objective of this review was to assess the effect of interventions promoting EBF on health outcomes in infants and children under 7 years of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to April 2022. Inclusion criteria were randomized or cluster-randomized controlled trials aiming to increase EBF that reported effects on offspring growth, morbidity, and/or mortality up to age 7 years. The primary outcome was infant/child growth. Secondary outcomes were infant morbidity and mortality and EBF rates. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two studies (40 papers) were identified. No effect on infant/child growth was observed. EBF promotion interventions significantly improved EBF rates up to 6 months (n = 25; OR 3.15; 95% CI: 2.36, 4.19) and significantly reduced the odds of respiratory illness at 0-3 months by 59% (n = 2; OR 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.84) but not at later time-points. A borderline significant effect was observed for diarrhea (n = 12; OR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.00). Effects on hospitalizations or mortality were not significant.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>EBF promotion interventions improve EBF rates and might yield modest reductions in infant morbidity without affecting infant/child growth. Future studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions and examine potential benefits on other health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8269,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Exclusive Breastfeeding Promotion Interventions on Child Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Dib, Frankie Joy Fair, Lucy Jane McCann, Antonia Nicholls, Anastasia Z Kalea, Hora Soltani, Mary Fewtrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000535564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interventions promoting exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) may benefit infant health outcomes, but evidence is inconsistent. The objective of this review was to assess the effect of interventions promoting EBF on health outcomes in infants and children under 7 years of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to April 2022. Inclusion criteria were randomized or cluster-randomized controlled trials aiming to increase EBF that reported effects on offspring growth, morbidity, and/or mortality up to age 7 years. The primary outcome was infant/child growth. Secondary outcomes were infant morbidity and mortality and EBF rates. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two studies (40 papers) were identified. No effect on infant/child growth was observed. EBF promotion interventions significantly improved EBF rates up to 6 months (n = 25; OR 3.15; 95% CI: 2.36, 4.19) and significantly reduced the odds of respiratory illness at 0-3 months by 59% (n = 2; OR 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.84) but not at later time-points. A borderline significant effect was observed for diarrhea (n = 12; OR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.00). Effects on hospitalizations or mortality were not significant.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>EBF promotion interventions improve EBF rates and might yield modest reductions in infant morbidity without affecting infant/child growth. Future studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions and examine potential benefits on other health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535564\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:促进纯母乳喂养(EBF)的干预措施可能有利于婴儿的健康结果,但证据并不一致。本综述旨在评估促进纯母乳喂养的干预措施对婴儿和 7 岁以下儿童健康结果的影响:方法:使用 EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Cochrane Central、Cochrane 系统性综述数据库和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台对从开始到 2022 年 4 月的文献进行了检索。纳入标准是旨在增加婴儿早期喂养的随机或分组随机对照试验,这些试验报告了对 7 岁以下儿童的生长、发病率和/或死亡率的影响。主要结果为婴儿/儿童生长。次要结果是婴儿发病率和死亡率以及纯母乳喂养率。采用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总:结果:共发现 32 项研究(40 篇论文)。未观察到对婴儿/儿童生长的影响。促进纯母乳喂养的干预措施显著提高了 6 个月以内的纯母乳喂养率(n=25;OR 3.15;95%CI 2.36,4.19),并将 0-3 个月婴儿患呼吸道疾病的几率显著降低了 59%(n=2;OR 0.41;95%CI 0.20,0.84),但在以后的时间点则没有影响。在腹泻方面,观察到了近似显着的效果(n=12;OR 0.84;95%CI 0.70,1.00)。对住院或死亡率的影响不显著:讨论/结论:促进婴儿出生后喂养的干预措施可提高婴儿出生后喂养率,并可适度降低婴儿发病率,同时不影响婴儿/儿童的生长。未来的研究应调查这些干预措施的成本效益,并研究其对其他健康结果的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Exclusive Breastfeeding Promotion Interventions on Child Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Interventions promoting exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) may benefit infant health outcomes, but evidence is inconsistent. The objective of this review was to assess the effect of interventions promoting EBF on health outcomes in infants and children under 7 years of age.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to April 2022. Inclusion criteria were randomized or cluster-randomized controlled trials aiming to increase EBF that reported effects on offspring growth, morbidity, and/or mortality up to age 7 years. The primary outcome was infant/child growth. Secondary outcomes were infant morbidity and mortality and EBF rates. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results: Thirty-two studies (40 papers) were identified. No effect on infant/child growth was observed. EBF promotion interventions significantly improved EBF rates up to 6 months (n = 25; OR 3.15; 95% CI: 2.36, 4.19) and significantly reduced the odds of respiratory illness at 0-3 months by 59% (n = 2; OR 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.84) but not at later time-points. A borderline significant effect was observed for diarrhea (n = 12; OR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.00). Effects on hospitalizations or mortality were not significant.

Discussion/conclusion: EBF promotion interventions improve EBF rates and might yield modest reductions in infant morbidity without affecting infant/child growth. Future studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions and examine potential benefits on other health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism'' is a leading international peer-reviewed journal for sharing information on human nutrition, metabolism and related fields, covering the broad and multidisciplinary nature of science in nutrition and metabolism. As the official journal of both the International Union of Nutritional Sciences (IUNS) and the Federation of European Nutrition Societies (FENS), the journal has a high visibility among both researchers and users of research outputs, including policy makers, across Europe and around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信