BaiXue Jia, Longhui Zhang, Yuesong Pan, Xu Tong, Xuelei Zhang, Dapeng Mo, Ning Ma, Gang Luo, Ligang Song, Xiaoqing Li, Bo Wang, Thanh N Nguyen, Feng Gao, Zhongrong Miao
{"title":"机械取栓后的血管成形术和/或支架植入术:谁能受益?","authors":"BaiXue Jia, Longhui Zhang, Yuesong Pan, Xu Tong, Xuelei Zhang, Dapeng Mo, Ning Ma, Gang Luo, Ligang Song, Xiaoqing Li, Bo Wang, Thanh N Nguyen, Feng Gao, Zhongrong Miao","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2023-020824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Angioplasty and/or stenting is a rescue therapy for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute intracranial large vessel occlusion. This study was undertaken to determine whether rescue angioplasty and/or stenting improves the outcome after MT and to investigate whether outcomes differ by subgroup of rescue indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed propensity score matching (PSM) with data from a prospective multicenter registry of patients with acute large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment. Patients were divided into the MT alone group and the MT with rescue therapy group. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. PSM was also performed in the failed MT (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 0-2a) and the residual severe stenosis (mTICI 2b-3) subgroups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>326 patients of mean±SD age 62.7±12.0 years (90 women, 27.6%) were matched from 1274 patients. In the matched cohort, functional independence at 90 days was higher in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (44.2% vs 29.5%; OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.06, P=0.008). In the failed MT subgroup with 66 matched pairs, more patients had functional independence in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (39.0% vs 17.0%; OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.29 to 7.59, P=0.01). In the residual stenosis subgroup with 63 matched pairs, functional independence rates were similar in the rescue therapy and the MT alone groups (51.6% vs 55.7%; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.72, P=0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting could improve the clinical outcome in patients with acute large vessel occlusion with failed MT, while no benefit was seen in those with residual severe stenosis but substantial reperfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1360-1367"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting after mechanical thrombectomy: who can benefit?\",\"authors\":\"BaiXue Jia, Longhui Zhang, Yuesong Pan, Xu Tong, Xuelei Zhang, Dapeng Mo, Ning Ma, Gang Luo, Ligang Song, Xiaoqing Li, Bo Wang, Thanh N Nguyen, Feng Gao, Zhongrong Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2023-020824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Angioplasty and/or stenting is a rescue therapy for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute intracranial large vessel occlusion. This study was undertaken to determine whether rescue angioplasty and/or stenting improves the outcome after MT and to investigate whether outcomes differ by subgroup of rescue indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed propensity score matching (PSM) with data from a prospective multicenter registry of patients with acute large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment. Patients were divided into the MT alone group and the MT with rescue therapy group. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. PSM was also performed in the failed MT (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 0-2a) and the residual severe stenosis (mTICI 2b-3) subgroups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>326 patients of mean±SD age 62.7±12.0 years (90 women, 27.6%) were matched from 1274 patients. In the matched cohort, functional independence at 90 days was higher in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (44.2% vs 29.5%; OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.06, P=0.008). In the failed MT subgroup with 66 matched pairs, more patients had functional independence in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (39.0% vs 17.0%; OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.29 to 7.59, P=0.01). In the residual stenosis subgroup with 63 matched pairs, functional independence rates were similar in the rescue therapy and the MT alone groups (51.6% vs 55.7%; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.72, P=0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting could improve the clinical outcome in patients with acute large vessel occlusion with failed MT, while no benefit was seen in those with residual severe stenosis but substantial reperfusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1360-1367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020824\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:血管成形术和/或支架植入术是急性颅内大血管闭塞的机械取栓术的一种抢救治疗方法。本研究旨在确定急诊血管成形术和/或支架置入术是否能改善MT后的预后,并调查急诊指征亚组的预后是否不同。方法:我们对接受血管内治疗的急性大血管闭塞患者的前瞻性多中心登记数据进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。患者分为单纯MT组和MT联合抢救治疗组。90天的主要终点是功能独立性(修正Rankin量表评分0-2)。在失败的MT(改良的脑梗死溶栓(mTICI) 0-2a)和残余严重狭窄(mTICI 2b-3)亚组中分别进行PSM。结果:1274例患者中匹配326例,平均±SD年龄62.7±12.0岁(女性90例,27.6%)。在匹配的队列中,抢救治疗组90天的功能独立性高于单独MT组(44.2% vs 29.5%;OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.18 ~ 3.06, P=0.008)。在66对MT失败亚组中,救援治疗组比单独MT组有更多的患者功能独立(39.0% vs 17.0%;OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.29 ~ 7.59, P=0.01)。在残余狭窄亚组(63对)中,救援治疗组和单独MT组的功能独立性率相似(51.6% vs 55.7%;OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42 ~ 1.72, P=0.65)。结论:救援血管成形术和/或支架植入术可改善MT失败的急性大血管闭塞患者的临床结果,而对于残留严重狭窄但再灌注充足的患者则没有任何益处。
Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting after mechanical thrombectomy: who can benefit?
Background: Angioplasty and/or stenting is a rescue therapy for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute intracranial large vessel occlusion. This study was undertaken to determine whether rescue angioplasty and/or stenting improves the outcome after MT and to investigate whether outcomes differ by subgroup of rescue indication.
Methods: We performed propensity score matching (PSM) with data from a prospective multicenter registry of patients with acute large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment. Patients were divided into the MT alone group and the MT with rescue therapy group. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. PSM was also performed in the failed MT (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 0-2a) and the residual severe stenosis (mTICI 2b-3) subgroups, respectively.
Results: 326 patients of mean±SD age 62.7±12.0 years (90 women, 27.6%) were matched from 1274 patients. In the matched cohort, functional independence at 90 days was higher in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (44.2% vs 29.5%; OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.06, P=0.008). In the failed MT subgroup with 66 matched pairs, more patients had functional independence in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (39.0% vs 17.0%; OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.29 to 7.59, P=0.01). In the residual stenosis subgroup with 63 matched pairs, functional independence rates were similar in the rescue therapy and the MT alone groups (51.6% vs 55.7%; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.72, P=0.65).
Conclusion: Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting could improve the clinical outcome in patients with acute large vessel occlusion with failed MT, while no benefit was seen in those with residual severe stenosis but substantial reperfusion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.