在医院环境中使用机器学习或深度学习模型来检测不适当的处方:系统审查。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Erin Johns, Ahmad Alkanj, Morgane Beck, Laurent Dal Mas, Benedicte Gourieux, Erik-André Sauleau, Bruno Michel
{"title":"在医院环境中使用机器学习或深度学习模型来检测不适当的处方:系统审查。","authors":"Erin Johns, Ahmad Alkanj, Morgane Beck, Laurent Dal Mas, Benedicte Gourieux, Erik-André Sauleau, Bruno Michel","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) is catching the interest of hospital pharmacists. A massive collection of health data is now available to train AI models and hold the promise of disrupting codes and practices. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the state of the art of machine learning or deep learning models that detect inappropriate hospital medication orders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 2023. Studies were included if they reported and described an AI model intended for use by clinical pharmacists in hospitals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 articles were selected after review: 12 studies were judged to have high risk of bias; 11 studies were published between 2020 and 2023; 8 were conducted in North America and Asia; 6 analysed orders and detected inappropriate prescriptions according to patient profiles and medication orders; and 7 detected specific inappropriate prescriptions, such as detecting antibiotic resistance, dosage abnormality in prescriptions, high alert drugs errors from prescriptions or predicting the risk of adverse drug events. Various AI models were used, mainly supervised learning techniques. The training datasets used were very heterogeneous; the length of study varied from 2 weeks to 7 years and the number of prescription orders analysed went from 31 to 5 804 192.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review points out that, to date, few original research studies report AI tools based on machine or deep learning in the field of hospital clinical pharmacy. However, these original articles, while preliminary, highlighted the potential value of integrating AI into clinical hospital pharmacy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":"289-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using machine learning or deep learning models in a hospital setting to detect inappropriate prescriptions: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Johns, Ahmad Alkanj, Morgane Beck, Laurent Dal Mas, Benedicte Gourieux, Erik-André Sauleau, Bruno Michel\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) is catching the interest of hospital pharmacists. A massive collection of health data is now available to train AI models and hold the promise of disrupting codes and practices. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the state of the art of machine learning or deep learning models that detect inappropriate hospital medication orders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 2023. Studies were included if they reported and described an AI model intended for use by clinical pharmacists in hospitals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 articles were selected after review: 12 studies were judged to have high risk of bias; 11 studies were published between 2020 and 2023; 8 were conducted in North America and Asia; 6 analysed orders and detected inappropriate prescriptions according to patient profiles and medication orders; and 7 detected specific inappropriate prescriptions, such as detecting antibiotic resistance, dosage abnormality in prescriptions, high alert drugs errors from prescriptions or predicting the risk of adverse drug events. Various AI models were used, mainly supervised learning techniques. The training datasets used were very heterogeneous; the length of study varied from 2 weeks to 7 years and the number of prescription orders analysed went from 31 to 5 804 192.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review points out that, to date, few original research studies report AI tools based on machine or deep learning in the field of hospital clinical pharmacy. However, these original articles, while preliminary, highlighted the potential value of integrating AI into clinical hospital pharmacy practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"289-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003857\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人工智能(AI)的出现引起了医院药师的兴趣。现在有大量的卫生数据可用于训练人工智能模型,并有望打破规范和做法。本系统综述的目的是检查机器学习或深度学习模型的最新技术,以检测不适当的医院医嘱。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行系统评价。从成立到2023年5月检索MEDLINE和Embase数据库。如果研究报告和描述了供医院临床药剂师使用的人工智能模型,则纳入研究。使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚风险。结果:经评审共筛选出13篇文献,其中12篇为高偏倚风险;2020年至2023年间发表了11项研究;8项研究在北美和亚洲进行;6根据患者资料和医嘱分析处方,发现不合适的处方;7项发现了特异性不适宜处方,如从处方中发现抗生素耐药性、处方中剂量异常、高警示用药错误或预测药物不良事件风险等。使用了各种人工智能模型,主要是监督学习技术。使用的训练数据集非常异构;研究时间从2周到7年不等,分析处方数量从31张到5 804 192张不等。结论:本系统综述指出,迄今为止,基于机器或深度学习的AI工具在医院临床药学领域的原创性研究很少。然而,这些原创文章虽然是初步的,但却突出了将人工智能融入临床医院药学实践的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using machine learning or deep learning models in a hospital setting to detect inappropriate prescriptions: a systematic review.

Objectives: The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) is catching the interest of hospital pharmacists. A massive collection of health data is now available to train AI models and hold the promise of disrupting codes and practices. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the state of the art of machine learning or deep learning models that detect inappropriate hospital medication orders.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 2023. Studies were included if they reported and described an AI model intended for use by clinical pharmacists in hospitals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).

Results: 13 articles were selected after review: 12 studies were judged to have high risk of bias; 11 studies were published between 2020 and 2023; 8 were conducted in North America and Asia; 6 analysed orders and detected inappropriate prescriptions according to patient profiles and medication orders; and 7 detected specific inappropriate prescriptions, such as detecting antibiotic resistance, dosage abnormality in prescriptions, high alert drugs errors from prescriptions or predicting the risk of adverse drug events. Various AI models were used, mainly supervised learning techniques. The training datasets used were very heterogeneous; the length of study varied from 2 weeks to 7 years and the number of prescription orders analysed went from 31 to 5 804 192.

Conclusions: This systematic review points out that, to date, few original research studies report AI tools based on machine or deep learning in the field of hospital clinical pharmacy. However, these original articles, while preliminary, highlighted the potential value of integrating AI into clinical hospital pharmacy practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信