痴呆症患者家庭照护者的生活质量:观察性和干预性研究的系统回顾

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Déborah Oliveira, Fabiana Araújo Figueiredo da Mata, Aimee Aubeeluck
{"title":"痴呆症患者家庭照护者的生活质量:观察性和干预性研究的系统回顾","authors":"Déborah Oliveira, Fabiana Araújo Figueiredo da Mata, Aimee Aubeeluck","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family members are the primary source of support for the growing number of people living with dementia (PLWD) worldwide. However, caring for a person living with dementia can have detrimental impacts on the carer quality of life (QoL). This review of systematic reviews explored the factors associated with the QoL of family carers of PLWD and interventions aimed at improving their QoL.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>Several health-related databases (PUBMED, Psychinfo, Google Scholar and COCHRANE) were consulted in November 2022. Nineteen systematic reviews were included, and their methodological quality was assessed via AMSTAR-2.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Better carer physical and mental health, provision of formal support, relationship quality between carers and PLWD, as well as positive psychological traits were associated with better carer QoL. There is no one-size-fits-all intervention that can improve the QoL of all carers, but promising results were found in most of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>There is inconsistency in evidence on the association between the carer age and QoL. The use of a wide range of QoL measures, particularly generic QoL scales, has contributed to inconsistencies when comparing the efficacy of interventions.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>Evidence suggests the need for a person-centred approach to improving carer QoL, considering individual and contextual needs as well as the continuum and progressive nature of dementia care.</p><p><strong>Timely areas for developing research: </strong>Future research should be focused on understanding how to best implement and measure person-centred care approaches to carer QoL, including cost-effectiveness. More qualitative studies are necessary to explore carer negative and positive experiences of QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life of family carers of people living with dementia: review of systematic reviews of observational and intervention studies.\",\"authors\":\"Déborah Oliveira, Fabiana Araújo Figueiredo da Mata, Aimee Aubeeluck\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bmb/ldad029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family members are the primary source of support for the growing number of people living with dementia (PLWD) worldwide. However, caring for a person living with dementia can have detrimental impacts on the carer quality of life (QoL). This review of systematic reviews explored the factors associated with the QoL of family carers of PLWD and interventions aimed at improving their QoL.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>Several health-related databases (PUBMED, Psychinfo, Google Scholar and COCHRANE) were consulted in November 2022. Nineteen systematic reviews were included, and their methodological quality was assessed via AMSTAR-2.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Better carer physical and mental health, provision of formal support, relationship quality between carers and PLWD, as well as positive psychological traits were associated with better carer QoL. There is no one-size-fits-all intervention that can improve the QoL of all carers, but promising results were found in most of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>There is inconsistency in evidence on the association between the carer age and QoL. The use of a wide range of QoL measures, particularly generic QoL scales, has contributed to inconsistencies when comparing the efficacy of interventions.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>Evidence suggests the need for a person-centred approach to improving carer QoL, considering individual and contextual needs as well as the continuum and progressive nature of dementia care.</p><p><strong>Timely areas for developing research: </strong>Future research should be focused on understanding how to best implement and measure person-centred care approaches to carer QoL, including cost-effectiveness. More qualitative studies are necessary to explore carer negative and positive experiences of QoL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldad029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldad029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:家庭成员是世界范围内日益增多的痴呆症患者的主要支持来源。然而,照顾痴呆症患者可能对护理者的生活质量(QoL)产生不利影响。这篇系统综述探讨了影响PLWD家庭照顾者生活质量的因素以及旨在改善其生活质量的干预措施。数据来源:于2022年11月咨询了几个健康相关数据库(PUBMED、Psychinfo、Google Scholar和COCHRANE)。纳入19项系统评价,并通过AMSTAR-2评估其方法学质量。同意的领域:更好的照顾者身心健康、提供正式支持、照顾者与PLWD之间的关系质量以及积极的心理特征与更好的照顾者生活质量相关。没有一种一刀切的干预措施可以改善所有护理人员的生活质量,但在大多数干预措施中发现了令人鼓舞的结果。争议领域:关于职业年龄与生活质量之间关系的证据不一致。在比较干预措施的效果时,使用了广泛的生活质量测量方法,特别是通用的生活质量量表,造成了不一致性。成长要点:证据表明需要以人为中心的方法来改善护理人员的生活质量,考虑到个人和环境需求以及痴呆症护理的连续性和进步性。及时开展研究的领域:未来的研究应侧重于了解如何最好地实施和衡量以人为本的护理方法,包括成本效益。需要更多的定性研究来探讨职业生涯生活质量的消极体验和积极体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of life of family carers of people living with dementia: review of systematic reviews of observational and intervention studies.

Introduction: Family members are the primary source of support for the growing number of people living with dementia (PLWD) worldwide. However, caring for a person living with dementia can have detrimental impacts on the carer quality of life (QoL). This review of systematic reviews explored the factors associated with the QoL of family carers of PLWD and interventions aimed at improving their QoL.

Sources of data: Several health-related databases (PUBMED, Psychinfo, Google Scholar and COCHRANE) were consulted in November 2022. Nineteen systematic reviews were included, and their methodological quality was assessed via AMSTAR-2.

Areas of agreement: Better carer physical and mental health, provision of formal support, relationship quality between carers and PLWD, as well as positive psychological traits were associated with better carer QoL. There is no one-size-fits-all intervention that can improve the QoL of all carers, but promising results were found in most of the interventions.

Areas of controversy: There is inconsistency in evidence on the association between the carer age and QoL. The use of a wide range of QoL measures, particularly generic QoL scales, has contributed to inconsistencies when comparing the efficacy of interventions.

Growing points: Evidence suggests the need for a person-centred approach to improving carer QoL, considering individual and contextual needs as well as the continuum and progressive nature of dementia care.

Timely areas for developing research: Future research should be focused on understanding how to best implement and measure person-centred care approaches to carer QoL, including cost-effectiveness. More qualitative studies are necessary to explore carer negative and positive experiences of QoL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信