Shannon R. Scarberry, Hannah Prutchi, Brett M. Frye, Justin Herr, Christie Scott, Chrissy M. Long, Matthew J. Jorgensen, Carol A. Shively, Kylie Kavanagh
{"title":"在非人类灵长类动物中,楼梯提升挑战作为衰老和身体功能测量的发展和评估。","authors":"Shannon R. Scarberry, Hannah Prutchi, Brett M. Frye, Justin Herr, Christie Scott, Chrissy M. Long, Matthew J. Jorgensen, Carol A. Shively, Kylie Kavanagh","doi":"10.1002/ajp.23582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are valuable models for studying healthspan, including frailty development. Frailty metrics in people centers on functional measures, including usual gait speed which can be predictive of all-cause mortality. This concept that physical competencies are able to prognosticate an individual's health trajectory over chronologic aging is well-accepted and has led to refinements in how physical function is evaluated, and include measures of strength and power along with walking speed. NHP studies of aging require evaluation of physical function, which can be difficult in field and research settings. We compared stair climb velocity to usual walking speed in 28 peri-geriatric to geriatric NHPs, as incorporating a climbing obstacle integrates multiple components of physical function: isolated leg and back strength, proprioception, balance, and range of motion. We find that stair climbing speed was reliable between observers, and whether timing was in-person take from video capture. The stair climb rates were 50% more associated with chronological age than walking speed (<i>R</i> = −0.68 vs. −0.45) and only stair climbing speeds were retained as predictive of age when walking speed and bodyweight were included in multivariate models (overall <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.44; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). When comparing young (10−16 years) versus geriatric (16−29 years) stair climbing speed was significantly different (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while walking speeds only tended to be slower (<i>p</i> = 0.12) suggesting that the additional challenge of a stair climb better unmasks subclinical frailty development that usual walking speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajp.23582","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and assessment of a stair ascension challenge as a measure of aging and physical function in nonhuman primates\",\"authors\":\"Shannon R. Scarberry, Hannah Prutchi, Brett M. Frye, Justin Herr, Christie Scott, Chrissy M. Long, Matthew J. Jorgensen, Carol A. Shively, Kylie Kavanagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajp.23582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are valuable models for studying healthspan, including frailty development. Frailty metrics in people centers on functional measures, including usual gait speed which can be predictive of all-cause mortality. This concept that physical competencies are able to prognosticate an individual's health trajectory over chronologic aging is well-accepted and has led to refinements in how physical function is evaluated, and include measures of strength and power along with walking speed. NHP studies of aging require evaluation of physical function, which can be difficult in field and research settings. We compared stair climb velocity to usual walking speed in 28 peri-geriatric to geriatric NHPs, as incorporating a climbing obstacle integrates multiple components of physical function: isolated leg and back strength, proprioception, balance, and range of motion. We find that stair climbing speed was reliable between observers, and whether timing was in-person take from video capture. The stair climb rates were 50% more associated with chronological age than walking speed (<i>R</i> = −0.68 vs. −0.45) and only stair climbing speeds were retained as predictive of age when walking speed and bodyweight were included in multivariate models (overall <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.44; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). When comparing young (10−16 years) versus geriatric (16−29 years) stair climbing speed was significantly different (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while walking speeds only tended to be slower (<i>p</i> = 0.12) suggesting that the additional challenge of a stair climb better unmasks subclinical frailty development that usual walking speed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Primatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajp.23582\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Primatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.23582\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.23582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非人灵长类动物(NHPs)是研究包括脆弱发育在内的健康跨度的有价值的模型。人们的虚弱指标集中在功能测量上,包括通常的步态速度,这可以预测全因死亡率。身体能力能够预测一个人在时间衰老过程中的健康轨迹,这一概念得到了广泛接受,并导致了身体功能评估方式的改进,包括力量和力量以及步行速度的测量。衰老的NHP研究需要身体功能的评估,这在现场和研究环境中可能是困难的。我们比较了28例老年和老年NHPs患者的爬楼梯速度和正常步行速度,因为攀爬障碍整合了身体功能的多个组成部分:独立的腿部和背部力量、本体感觉、平衡和运动范围。我们发现爬楼梯的速度在观察者之间是可靠的,并且时间是否从视频捕捉中亲自拍摄。爬楼梯率与实足年龄的相关性比步行速度高50% (R = -0.68 vs. -0.45),当多变量模型中包括步行速度和体重时,只有爬楼梯速度被保留为年龄的预测因子(总体R2 = 0.44;p
Development and assessment of a stair ascension challenge as a measure of aging and physical function in nonhuman primates
Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are valuable models for studying healthspan, including frailty development. Frailty metrics in people centers on functional measures, including usual gait speed which can be predictive of all-cause mortality. This concept that physical competencies are able to prognosticate an individual's health trajectory over chronologic aging is well-accepted and has led to refinements in how physical function is evaluated, and include measures of strength and power along with walking speed. NHP studies of aging require evaluation of physical function, which can be difficult in field and research settings. We compared stair climb velocity to usual walking speed in 28 peri-geriatric to geriatric NHPs, as incorporating a climbing obstacle integrates multiple components of physical function: isolated leg and back strength, proprioception, balance, and range of motion. We find that stair climbing speed was reliable between observers, and whether timing was in-person take from video capture. The stair climb rates were 50% more associated with chronological age than walking speed (R = −0.68 vs. −0.45) and only stair climbing speeds were retained as predictive of age when walking speed and bodyweight were included in multivariate models (overall R2 = 0.44; p < 0.0001). When comparing young (10−16 years) versus geriatric (16−29 years) stair climbing speed was significantly different (p < 0.001), while walking speeds only tended to be slower (p = 0.12) suggesting that the additional challenge of a stair climb better unmasks subclinical frailty development that usual walking speed.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike.
Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.