无标准可改变危险因素的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床结局。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yu Suresvar Singh MD , Hideki Wada MD, PhD , Manabu Ogita MD, PhD , Yuta Takamura MD , Takuya Onozato MD , Wataru Fujita MD , Keiki Abe MD , Jun Shitara MD, PhD , Hirohisa Endo MD, PhD , Shuta Tsuboi MD, PhD , Satoru Suwa MD , Katsumi Miyauchi MD, FJCC , Tohru Minamino MD, PhD, FJCC
{"title":"无标准可改变危险因素的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床结局。","authors":"Yu Suresvar Singh MD ,&nbsp;Hideki Wada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Manabu Ogita MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuta Takamura MD ,&nbsp;Takuya Onozato MD ,&nbsp;Wataru Fujita MD ,&nbsp;Keiki Abe MD ,&nbsp;Jun Shitara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hirohisa Endo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shuta Tsuboi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Satoru Suwa MD ,&nbsp;Katsumi Miyauchi MD, FJCC ,&nbsp;Tohru Minamino MD, PhD, FJCC","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs; hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia<span>, and smoking) are widely recognized as risk factors for coronary artery disease. However, the associations between absence of SMuRFs and long-term clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients are unclear.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1999 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was up to 5-year all-cause mortality. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients with at least one of the SMuRFs and those without any SMuRFs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Of 1963 STEMI patients, 126 (6.4 %) did not have any SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs were significantly older, had lower body mass index<span>, and were more likely to be female. During a median follow-up period of 4.9 years, the cumulative incidence of death was significantly higher in patients without SMuRFs than in those with SMuRFs (log-rank </span></span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Landmark analysis showed that patients without SMuRFs had higher mortality within 30 days of STEMI onset (log-rank <em>p</em> = 0.0045) and &gt;30 days after STEMI onset (log-rank <em>p</em> = 0.0004). Multivariable Cox hazards analysis showed that absence of SMuRFs was associated with a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95 % confidence interval, 1.14–2.21; <em>p</em> = 0.006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, patients without any SMuRFs had higher mortality than those with at least one of the SMuRFs. Patients without any SMuRFs have a poor prognosis and require more attention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients without standard modifiable risk factors\",\"authors\":\"Yu Suresvar Singh MD ,&nbsp;Hideki Wada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Manabu Ogita MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuta Takamura MD ,&nbsp;Takuya Onozato MD ,&nbsp;Wataru Fujita MD ,&nbsp;Keiki Abe MD ,&nbsp;Jun Shitara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hirohisa Endo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shuta Tsuboi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Satoru Suwa MD ,&nbsp;Katsumi Miyauchi MD, FJCC ,&nbsp;Tohru Minamino MD, PhD, FJCC\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs; hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia<span>, and smoking) are widely recognized as risk factors for coronary artery disease. However, the associations between absence of SMuRFs and long-term clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients are unclear.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1999 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was up to 5-year all-cause mortality. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients with at least one of the SMuRFs and those without any SMuRFs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Of 1963 STEMI patients, 126 (6.4 %) did not have any SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs were significantly older, had lower body mass index<span>, and were more likely to be female. During a median follow-up period of 4.9 years, the cumulative incidence of death was significantly higher in patients without SMuRFs than in those with SMuRFs (log-rank </span></span><em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). Landmark analysis showed that patients without SMuRFs had higher mortality within 30 days of STEMI onset (log-rank <em>p</em> = 0.0045) and &gt;30 days after STEMI onset (log-rank <em>p</em> = 0.0004). Multivariable Cox hazards analysis showed that absence of SMuRFs was associated with a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95 % confidence interval, 1.14–2.21; <em>p</em> = 0.006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, patients without any SMuRFs had higher mortality than those with at least one of the SMuRFs. Patients without any SMuRFs have a poor prognosis and require more attention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 41-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508723002861\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508723002861","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:标准可改变心血管危险因素(smurf;高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常和吸烟是公认的冠状动脉疾病的危险因素。然而,st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者缺乏smurf与长期临床结果之间的关系尚不清楚。方法:回顾性分析1999 - 2015年间连续行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的STEMI患者。主要终点是5年全因死亡率。比较了至少有一种smurf的患者和没有任何smurf的患者的临床特征和结果。结果:在1963例STEMI患者中,126例(6.4 %)没有任何smurf。没有smurf的患者明显更老,身体质量指数更低,而且更可能是女性。在中位随访时间为4.9 年期间,无smurf患者的累积死亡发生率显著高于smurf患者(STEMI发病后30 天log-rank p = 0.0004)。多变量Cox风险分析显示,缺乏smurf与较高的死亡风险相关(风险比,1.59;95 %置信区间,1.14-2.21; = 0.006页)。结论:在接受初级PCI的STEMI患者中,没有任何smurf的患者的死亡率高于至少有一种smurf的患者。没有任何smurf的患者预后较差,需要更多的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients without standard modifiable risk factors

Clinical outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients without standard modifiable risk factors

Clinical outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients without standard modifiable risk factors

Background

Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs; hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and smoking) are widely recognized as risk factors for coronary artery disease. However, the associations between absence of SMuRFs and long-term clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients are unclear.

Methods

Consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1999 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was up to 5-year all-cause mortality. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients with at least one of the SMuRFs and those without any SMuRFs.

Results

Of 1963 STEMI patients, 126 (6.4 %) did not have any SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs were significantly older, had lower body mass index, and were more likely to be female. During a median follow-up period of 4.9 years, the cumulative incidence of death was significantly higher in patients without SMuRFs than in those with SMuRFs (log-rank p < 0.0001). Landmark analysis showed that patients without SMuRFs had higher mortality within 30 days of STEMI onset (log-rank p = 0.0045) and >30 days after STEMI onset (log-rank p = 0.0004). Multivariable Cox hazards analysis showed that absence of SMuRFs was associated with a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95 % confidence interval, 1.14–2.21; p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, patients without any SMuRFs had higher mortality than those with at least one of the SMuRFs. Patients without any SMuRFs have a poor prognosis and require more attention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信