Uğur Ufuk Işın, Emin Çakmakçı, Ayşe Derya Buluş, Yüksel Yaşartekin, Öznur Ünal, Onur Dirican, Abbas Ali Husseini
{"title":"超声皮质骨厚度测量:能否预测儿科人群的骨密度?","authors":"Uğur Ufuk Işın, Emin Çakmakçı, Ayşe Derya Buluş, Yüksel Yaşartekin, Öznur Ünal, Onur Dirican, Abbas Ali Husseini","doi":"10.4274/dir.2023.232392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore sonographic cortical bone thickness (CoT) as a potential indicator of bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for screening and diagnosing pediatric osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study included 41 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients and 52 healthy children. Radius cortical thickness (R-CoT), tibial cortical thickness (T-CoT), and second metatarsal cortical thickness (M-CoT) were measured by B-mode ultrasound; CoT values were compared between groups and the correlation between BMD and CoT was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in R-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.433), T-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.057), and M-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.978) values between the patient and control groups. No significant correlations were found between BMD T-scores and R-CoT (r = -0.073, <i>P</i> = 0.490), T-CoT (r = -0.154, <i>P</i> = 0.141), and M-CoT (r = 0.047, <i>P</i> = 0.657) values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sonographic CoT values in children do not correlate with BMD values. Unlike in adults, sonographic CoT measurements do not appear to have a role in assessing BMD in the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sonographic cortical bone thickness measurement: can it predict bone mineral density in the pediatric population?\",\"authors\":\"Uğur Ufuk Işın, Emin Çakmakçı, Ayşe Derya Buluş, Yüksel Yaşartekin, Öznur Ünal, Onur Dirican, Abbas Ali Husseini\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/dir.2023.232392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore sonographic cortical bone thickness (CoT) as a potential indicator of bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for screening and diagnosing pediatric osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study included 41 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients and 52 healthy children. Radius cortical thickness (R-CoT), tibial cortical thickness (T-CoT), and second metatarsal cortical thickness (M-CoT) were measured by B-mode ultrasound; CoT values were compared between groups and the correlation between BMD and CoT was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in R-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.433), T-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.057), and M-CoT (<i>P</i> = 0.978) values between the patient and control groups. No significant correlations were found between BMD T-scores and R-CoT (r = -0.073, <i>P</i> = 0.490), T-CoT (r = -0.154, <i>P</i> = 0.141), and M-CoT (r = 0.047, <i>P</i> = 0.657) values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sonographic CoT values in children do not correlate with BMD values. Unlike in adults, sonographic CoT measurements do not appear to have a role in assessing BMD in the pediatric population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.232392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.232392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sonographic cortical bone thickness measurement: can it predict bone mineral density in the pediatric population?
Purpose: To explore sonographic cortical bone thickness (CoT) as a potential indicator of bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for screening and diagnosing pediatric osteoporosis.
Methods: A prospective study included 41 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients and 52 healthy children. Radius cortical thickness (R-CoT), tibial cortical thickness (T-CoT), and second metatarsal cortical thickness (M-CoT) were measured by B-mode ultrasound; CoT values were compared between groups and the correlation between BMD and CoT was examined.
Results: There were no significant differences in R-CoT (P = 0.433), T-CoT (P = 0.057), and M-CoT (P = 0.978) values between the patient and control groups. No significant correlations were found between BMD T-scores and R-CoT (r = -0.073, P = 0.490), T-CoT (r = -0.154, P = 0.141), and M-CoT (r = 0.047, P = 0.657) values.
Conclusion: Sonographic CoT values in children do not correlate with BMD values. Unlike in adults, sonographic CoT measurements do not appear to have a role in assessing BMD in the pediatric population.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English.
The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.