用韦氏记忆量表iv检测轻度外伤性脑损伤当事人的不可信认知表现。

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2023.2287139
George K Henry
{"title":"用韦氏记忆量表iv检测轻度外伤性脑损伤当事人的不可信认知表现。","authors":"George K Henry","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2023.2287139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the operating characteristics of selective measures on the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV (WMS-IV) to predict noncredible neurocognitive dysfunction in a sample of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) litigants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants included 110 adults who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological examination. Criterion groups were formed based upon their performance on stand-alone measures of cognitive performance validity testing (PVT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants failing two stand-alone PVTs exhibited significantly lower scores across all WMS-IV dependent variables of interest compared to participants who passed both PVTs. Participants who failed one PVT were excluded. Bivariate logistic regression revealed that all six dependent variables were significant predictors of PVT status. The best prediction model consisted of three WMS-IV variables including Logical Memory Delayed Recall (LM2), Logical Memory Recognition (LMR), and Visual Reproduction Recognition (VRR). This model demonstrated an accuracy of 90.2%, 0.89 sensitivity, 0.92 specificity, and a Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) of 0.957.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current empirically-derived cutscores and logit equation for the WMS-IV may be an additional consideration in analyzing database validity and noncredible performance in mTBI personal injury litigants ages 18-69.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1454-1461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of noncredible cognitive performance with Wechsler Memory Scale-IV measures in mild traumatic brain injury litigants.\",\"authors\":\"George K Henry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2023.2287139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the operating characteristics of selective measures on the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV (WMS-IV) to predict noncredible neurocognitive dysfunction in a sample of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) litigants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants included 110 adults who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological examination. Criterion groups were formed based upon their performance on stand-alone measures of cognitive performance validity testing (PVT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants failing two stand-alone PVTs exhibited significantly lower scores across all WMS-IV dependent variables of interest compared to participants who passed both PVTs. Participants who failed one PVT were excluded. Bivariate logistic regression revealed that all six dependent variables were significant predictors of PVT status. The best prediction model consisted of three WMS-IV variables including Logical Memory Delayed Recall (LM2), Logical Memory Recognition (LMR), and Visual Reproduction Recognition (VRR). This model demonstrated an accuracy of 90.2%, 0.89 sensitivity, 0.92 specificity, and a Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) of 0.957.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current empirically-derived cutscores and logit equation for the WMS-IV may be an additional consideration in analyzing database validity and noncredible performance in mTBI personal injury litigants ages 18-69.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1454-1461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2287139\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2287139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨韦氏记忆量表- iv (WMS-IV)选择性测量方法预测轻度颅脑损伤(mTBI)诉讼当事人非可信神经认知功能障碍的操作特点。方法:参与者包括110名成年人,他们接受了全面的神经心理学检查。标准组是根据他们在独立的认知表现效度测试(PVT)中的表现形成的。结果:与通过两次独立pvt的参与者相比,未通过两次独立pvt的参与者在所有WMS-IV相关变量中表现出明显较低的得分。一次PVT失败的参与者被排除在外。双变量logistic回归结果显示,6个因变量均为PVT状态的显著预测因子。最佳预测模型由逻辑记忆延迟回忆(LM2)、逻辑记忆识别(LMR)和视觉再现识别(VRR)三个WMS-IV变量组成。该模型准确率为90.2%,灵敏度为0.89,特异性为0.92,受试者工作曲线(ROC)为0.957。结论:目前经验推导的WMS-IV的切割分数和logit方程可能是分析18-69岁mTBI人身伤害诉讼中数据库有效性和不可信表现的额外考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of noncredible cognitive performance with Wechsler Memory Scale-IV measures in mild traumatic brain injury litigants.

Objective: To investigate the operating characteristics of selective measures on the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV (WMS-IV) to predict noncredible neurocognitive dysfunction in a sample of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) litigants.

Method: Participants included 110 adults who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological examination. Criterion groups were formed based upon their performance on stand-alone measures of cognitive performance validity testing (PVT).

Results: Participants failing two stand-alone PVTs exhibited significantly lower scores across all WMS-IV dependent variables of interest compared to participants who passed both PVTs. Participants who failed one PVT were excluded. Bivariate logistic regression revealed that all six dependent variables were significant predictors of PVT status. The best prediction model consisted of three WMS-IV variables including Logical Memory Delayed Recall (LM2), Logical Memory Recognition (LMR), and Visual Reproduction Recognition (VRR). This model demonstrated an accuracy of 90.2%, 0.89 sensitivity, 0.92 specificity, and a Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) of 0.957.

Conclusion: The current empirically-derived cutscores and logit equation for the WMS-IV may be an additional consideration in analyzing database validity and noncredible performance in mTBI personal injury litigants ages 18-69.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信