表面活性剂应用的替代路线-更新。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Angela Kribs , Kari D. Roberts , Daniele Trevisanuto , Colm O' Donnell , Peter A. Dargaville
{"title":"表面活性剂应用的替代路线-更新。","authors":"Angela Kribs ,&nbsp;Kari D. Roberts ,&nbsp;Daniele Trevisanuto ,&nbsp;Colm O' Donnell ,&nbsp;Peter A. Dargaville","doi":"10.1016/j.siny.2023.101496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Non-invasive modes of respiratory support have been shown to be the preferable way of primary respiratory support of preterm infants with </span>respiratory distress syndrome<span><span> (RDS). The avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation can be beneficial for preterm infants in reduction of morbidity and even mortality. However, it is well-established that some infants managed with non-invasive respiratory support from the outset have symptomatic RDS to a degree that warrants surfactant administration. Infants for whom non-invasive respiratory support ultimately fails are prone to </span>adverse outcomes<span>, occurring at a frequency on par with the group intubated primarily. This raises the question how to combine non-invasive respiratory support with surfactant therapy. Several methods of less or minimally invasive surfactant therapy have been developed to address the dilemma between avoidance of mechanical ventilation and administration of surfactant. This paper describes the different methods of less invasive surfactant application, reports the existing evidence from clinical studies, discusses the limitations of each of the methods and the open and future research questions.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49547,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"28 6","pages":"Article 101496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative routes of surfactant application – An update\",\"authors\":\"Angela Kribs ,&nbsp;Kari D. Roberts ,&nbsp;Daniele Trevisanuto ,&nbsp;Colm O' Donnell ,&nbsp;Peter A. Dargaville\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.siny.2023.101496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Non-invasive modes of respiratory support have been shown to be the preferable way of primary respiratory support of preterm infants with </span>respiratory distress syndrome<span><span> (RDS). The avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation can be beneficial for preterm infants in reduction of morbidity and even mortality. However, it is well-established that some infants managed with non-invasive respiratory support from the outset have symptomatic RDS to a degree that warrants surfactant administration. Infants for whom non-invasive respiratory support ultimately fails are prone to </span>adverse outcomes<span>, occurring at a frequency on par with the group intubated primarily. This raises the question how to combine non-invasive respiratory support with surfactant therapy. Several methods of less or minimally invasive surfactant therapy have been developed to address the dilemma between avoidance of mechanical ventilation and administration of surfactant. This paper describes the different methods of less invasive surfactant application, reports the existing evidence from clinical studies, discusses the limitations of each of the methods and the open and future research questions.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744165X23000720\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744165X23000720","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无创呼吸支持模式已被证明是呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)早产儿首选的初级呼吸支持方式。避免有创机械通气可降低早产儿的发病率,甚至死亡率。然而,一些从一开始就接受无创呼吸支持治疗的婴儿有一定程度的症状性RDS,需要表面活性剂的治疗。无创呼吸支持最终失败的婴儿容易出现不良后果,其发生频率与主要插管组相同。这就提出了如何将无创呼吸支持与表面活性剂治疗相结合的问题。为了解决避免机械通气和使用表面活性剂之间的困境,已经开发了几种较少或微创表面活性剂治疗方法。本文介绍了微创表面活性剂应用的不同方法,报告了临床研究的现有证据,讨论了每种方法的局限性以及开放和未来的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative routes of surfactant application – An update

Non-invasive modes of respiratory support have been shown to be the preferable way of primary respiratory support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation can be beneficial for preterm infants in reduction of morbidity and even mortality. However, it is well-established that some infants managed with non-invasive respiratory support from the outset have symptomatic RDS to a degree that warrants surfactant administration. Infants for whom non-invasive respiratory support ultimately fails are prone to adverse outcomes, occurring at a frequency on par with the group intubated primarily. This raises the question how to combine non-invasive respiratory support with surfactant therapy. Several methods of less or minimally invasive surfactant therapy have been developed to address the dilemma between avoidance of mechanical ventilation and administration of surfactant. This paper describes the different methods of less invasive surfactant application, reports the existing evidence from clinical studies, discusses the limitations of each of the methods and the open and future research questions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (formerly Seminars in Neonatology) is a bi-monthly journal which publishes topic-based issues, including current ''Hot Topics'' on the latest advances in fetal and neonatal medicine. The Journal is of interest to obstetricians and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. The Journal commissions review-based content covering current clinical opinion on the care and treatment of the pregnant patient and the neonate and draws on the necessary specialist knowledge, including that of the pediatric pulmonologist, the pediatric infectious disease specialist, the surgeon, as well as the general pediatrician and obstetrician. Each topic-based issue is edited by an authority in their field and contains 8-10 articles. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine provides: • Coverage of major developments in neonatal care; • Value to practising neonatologists, consultant and trainee pediatricians, obstetricians, midwives and fetal medicine specialists wishing to extend their knowledge in this field; • Up-to-date information in an attractive and relevant format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信