Soon Woo Hong, Kyung Hwa Chang, Chang Jae Woo, Ho Chul Kim, Bong Seop Kwak, Bong Joo Park, Ki Chang Nam
{"title":"在不同气道模型和呼吸方式下通过雾化器给药抗体效率的评价。","authors":"Soon Woo Hong, Kyung Hwa Chang, Chang Jae Woo, Ho Chul Kim, Bong Seop Kwak, Bong Joo Park, Ki Chang Nam","doi":"10.1186/s40360-023-00711-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nebulizers are commonly used to treat respiratory diseases, which are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. While inhalation therapy with antibodies has been evaluated in preclinical studies and clinical trials for respiratory diseases, it has not yet been approved for treatment. Moreover, there is limited information regarding the delivery efficiency of therapeutic antibodies via nebulizer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, the nebulization characteristics and drug delivery efficiencies were compared when immunoglobulin G (IgG) was delivered by five nebulizers using two airway models and five breathing patterns. The study confirmed that the delivered dose and drug delivery efficiency were reduced in the child model compared to those in the adult model and in the asthma pattern compared to those in the normal breathing pattern.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NE-SM1 NEPLUS vibrating mesh nebulizer demonstrated the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the loading dose, whereas the PARI BOY SX + LC SPRINT (breath-enhanced) jet nebulizer had the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the emitted dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the total inspiration volume, output rate, and particle size should be considered when IgG nebulization is used. We, therefore, propose a method for evaluating the efficiency of nebulizer for predicting antibody drug delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of antibody drug delivery efficiency via nebulizer in various airway models and breathing patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Soon Woo Hong, Kyung Hwa Chang, Chang Jae Woo, Ho Chul Kim, Bong Seop Kwak, Bong Joo Park, Ki Chang Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40360-023-00711-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nebulizers are commonly used to treat respiratory diseases, which are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. While inhalation therapy with antibodies has been evaluated in preclinical studies and clinical trials for respiratory diseases, it has not yet been approved for treatment. Moreover, there is limited information regarding the delivery efficiency of therapeutic antibodies via nebulizer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, the nebulization characteristics and drug delivery efficiencies were compared when immunoglobulin G (IgG) was delivered by five nebulizers using two airway models and five breathing patterns. The study confirmed that the delivered dose and drug delivery efficiency were reduced in the child model compared to those in the adult model and in the asthma pattern compared to those in the normal breathing pattern.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NE-SM1 NEPLUS vibrating mesh nebulizer demonstrated the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the loading dose, whereas the PARI BOY SX + LC SPRINT (breath-enhanced) jet nebulizer had the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the emitted dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the total inspiration volume, output rate, and particle size should be considered when IgG nebulization is used. We, therefore, propose a method for evaluating the efficiency of nebulizer for predicting antibody drug delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-023-00711-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-023-00711-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:雾化器常用于治疗呼吸系统疾病,这是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。虽然抗体吸入疗法已在临床前研究和临床试验中对呼吸系统疾病进行了评估,但尚未批准用于治疗。此外,关于治疗性抗体通过雾化器的输送效率的信息有限。方法:比较2种气道模型、5种呼吸方式下5种雾化器给药免疫球蛋白G (IgG)的雾化特性和给药效率。研究证实,与成人模型相比,儿童模型的给药剂量和给药效率有所降低,哮喘模式与正常呼吸模式相比,给药剂量和给药效率有所降低。结果:NE-SM1 NEPLUS振动网状雾化器的给药效率最高,以负载剂量的百分比计算,而PARI BOY SX + LC SPRINT(呼吸增强)喷射雾化器的给药效率最高,以发射剂量的百分比计算。结论:IgG雾化时应考虑总吸入量、输出速率和颗粒大小。因此,我们提出了一种评估雾化器预测抗体药物递送效率的方法。
Evaluation of antibody drug delivery efficiency via nebulizer in various airway models and breathing patterns.
Background: Nebulizers are commonly used to treat respiratory diseases, which are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. While inhalation therapy with antibodies has been evaluated in preclinical studies and clinical trials for respiratory diseases, it has not yet been approved for treatment. Moreover, there is limited information regarding the delivery efficiency of therapeutic antibodies via nebulizer.
Methods: In this study, the nebulization characteristics and drug delivery efficiencies were compared when immunoglobulin G (IgG) was delivered by five nebulizers using two airway models and five breathing patterns. The study confirmed that the delivered dose and drug delivery efficiency were reduced in the child model compared to those in the adult model and in the asthma pattern compared to those in the normal breathing pattern.
Results: The NE-SM1 NEPLUS vibrating mesh nebulizer demonstrated the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the loading dose, whereas the PARI BOY SX + LC SPRINT (breath-enhanced) jet nebulizer had the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the emitted dose.
Conclusion: The results suggest that the total inspiration volume, output rate, and particle size should be considered when IgG nebulization is used. We, therefore, propose a method for evaluating the efficiency of nebulizer for predicting antibody drug delivery.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.