协助、咨询、参与:是否有必要重新定义社区参与的概念?

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Gaceta Sanitaria Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102344

Viola Cassetti , María Victoria López-Ruiz , Alba Gallego-Royo , Ana Egea-Ronda , Vicente Gea-Caballero , Dory Aviñó Juan Ulpiano , María Pilar Baraza Cano , Esperanza Romero Rodríguez , EvaluA GPS Research Group

{"title":"协助、咨询、参与:是否有必要重新定义社区参与的概念?","authors":"Viola Cassetti , María Victoria López-Ruiz , Alba Gallego-Royo , Ana Egea-Ronda , Vicente Gea-Caballero , Dory Aviñó Juan Ulpiano , María Pilar Baraza Cano , Esperanza Romero Rodríguez , EvaluA GPS Research Group","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe how a sample of people working in community health promotion projects perceive and implement community engagement approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Mixed qualitative–quantitative study. Data was collected through: semi-structured interviews with 10 people representing the projects, and workshops in which 53 people participated and responded to a questionnaire prepared ad hoc to identify levels of community engagement. Descriptive statistical analysis of the questionnaires and framework analysis of the interviews, observations and workshops recordings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Although the projects are described as highly participatory, community engagement appeared mainly in the form of attending events, with few examples of consultation or community involvement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This difference may be due to the lack of a culture of participation, both in individuals and institutions, and lack of training in community engagement. It is proposed to change the language from participation-attendance to using expressions such as consulting or involving people.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12494,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Sanitaria","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 102344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000651/pdfft?md5=d2e0de71af54e365f2f0d1e2a92638fe&pid=1-s2.0-S0213911123000651-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asistir, consultar, involucrar: ¿es necesario redefinir el concepto de participación comunitaria?\",\"authors\":\"Viola Cassetti , María Victoria López-Ruiz , Alba Gallego-Royo , Ana Egea-Ronda , Vicente Gea-Caballero , Dory Aviñó Juan Ulpiano , María Pilar Baraza Cano , Esperanza Romero Rodríguez , EvaluA GPS Research Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe how a sample of people working in community health promotion projects perceive and implement community engagement approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Mixed qualitative–quantitative study. Data was collected through: semi-structured interviews with 10 people representing the projects, and workshops in which 53 people participated and responded to a questionnaire prepared ad hoc to identify levels of community engagement. Descriptive statistical analysis of the questionnaires and framework analysis of the interviews, observations and workshops recordings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Although the projects are described as highly participatory, community engagement appeared mainly in the form of attending events, with few examples of consultation or community involvement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This difference may be due to the lack of a culture of participation, both in individuals and institutions, and lack of training in community engagement. It is proposed to change the language from participation-attendance to using expressions such as consulting or involving people.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000651/pdfft?md5=d2e0de71af54e365f2f0d1e2a92638fe&pid=1-s2.0-S0213911123000651-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000651\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述社区健康促进项目工作人员对社区参与方法的认知和实施情况。方法定性定量混合研究。数据通过以下方式收集:与10名代表项目的人员进行半结构化访谈，以及53人参加并回答专门准备的问卷调查，以确定社区参与程度的研讨会。问卷的描述性统计分析和访谈、观察和工作坊记录的框架分析。结果虽然这些项目被描述为高度参与，但社区参与主要以参加活动的形式出现，很少有咨询或社区参与的例子。这种差异可能是由于个人和机构缺乏参与的文化，以及缺乏社区参与的培训。有人建议将“参与”一词改为“咨询”或“参与”等表达。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Asistir, consultar, involucrar: ¿es necesario redefinir el concepto de participación comunitaria?

Objective

To describe how a sample of people working in community health promotion projects perceive and implement community engagement approaches.

Method

Mixed qualitative–quantitative study. Data was collected through: semi-structured interviews with 10 people representing the projects, and workshops in which 53 people participated and responded to a questionnaire prepared ad hoc to identify levels of community engagement. Descriptive statistical analysis of the questionnaires and framework analysis of the interviews, observations and workshops recordings.

Results

Although the projects are described as highly participatory, community engagement appeared mainly in the form of attending events, with few examples of consultation or community involvement.

Conclusions

This difference may be due to the lack of a culture of participation, both in individuals and institutions, and lack of training in community engagement. It is proposed to change the language from participation-attendance to using expressions such as consulting or involving people.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Gaceta Sanitaria 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

5.30%

发文量

审稿时长

29 days

期刊介绍： Gaceta Sanitaria (Health Gazette) is an international journal that accepts articles in Spanish and in English. It is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS). The Journal publishes 6 issues per year on different areas of Public Health and Health Administration, including: -Applied epidemiology- Health prevention and promotion- Environmental health- International health- Management and assessment of policies and services- Health technology assessments- Health economics. The editorial process is regulated by a peer review system. It publishes original works, reviews, opinion articles, field and methodology notes, protocols, letters to the editor, editorials, and debates.