植物性饲料添加剂对肉牛生长性能、采食量和胴体性状的影响

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
W.Z. Yang , P.M.T. Lima , S. Ramirez , E. Schwandt , T.A. McAllister
{"title":"植物性饲料添加剂对肉牛生长性能、采食量和胴体性状的影响","authors":"W.Z. Yang ,&nbsp;P.M.T. Lima ,&nbsp;S. Ramirez ,&nbsp;E. Schwandt ,&nbsp;T.A. McAllister","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examined the effects of a commercial phytogenic feed additive (PFA) on growth performance, feed efficiency, carcass traits, liver abscesses, and the immune response of growing and finishing steers.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Forty-five crossbred Angus steers (initial BW = 272 ± 20.5 kg) housed in individual pens (4.9 × 1.8 m) were used in a randomized complete block design in a 110-d growing and 120-d finishing experiment. Steers were blocked by BW and allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: control (without PFA and monensin), PFA at 500 mg/steer daily, or monensin at 300 mg/steer daily. Steers were fed a TMR ad libitum once daily and weighed on d 32, 59, and 110 in the growing phase but only at the beginning and the end of the finishing phase.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>During growing, DMI did not differ, whereas final BW (trend; 415 vs. 403 kg) and ADG (numerically; 1.31 vs. 1.20 kg/d) were greater with PFA than control but did not differ from monensin (BW = 422 kg and ADG = 1.38 kg/d). Gain:feed was greater with monensin (0.173) than with PFA (0.161) and for the control (0.156). During finishing, ADG, G:F, and carcass traits did not differ, whereas DMI and acute proteins were lesser with monensin than with PFA and for the control.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Growing steers fed PFA had similar DMI and ADG but lesser G:F than did those given monensin. Both PFA and monensin resulted in similar growth performance and G:F in the finishing phase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000678/pdf?md5=7c47d81c5b0c8e9e7f638a4c00ce8014&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286523000678-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a phytogenic feed additive on growth performance, feed intake, and carcass traits of beef steers\",\"authors\":\"W.Z. Yang ,&nbsp;P.M.T. Lima ,&nbsp;S. Ramirez ,&nbsp;E. Schwandt ,&nbsp;T.A. McAllister\",\"doi\":\"10.15232/aas.2023-02421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examined the effects of a commercial phytogenic feed additive (PFA) on growth performance, feed efficiency, carcass traits, liver abscesses, and the immune response of growing and finishing steers.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Forty-five crossbred Angus steers (initial BW = 272 ± 20.5 kg) housed in individual pens (4.9 × 1.8 m) were used in a randomized complete block design in a 110-d growing and 120-d finishing experiment. Steers were blocked by BW and allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: control (without PFA and monensin), PFA at 500 mg/steer daily, or monensin at 300 mg/steer daily. Steers were fed a TMR ad libitum once daily and weighed on d 32, 59, and 110 in the growing phase but only at the beginning and the end of the finishing phase.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>During growing, DMI did not differ, whereas final BW (trend; 415 vs. 403 kg) and ADG (numerically; 1.31 vs. 1.20 kg/d) were greater with PFA than control but did not differ from monensin (BW = 422 kg and ADG = 1.38 kg/d). Gain:feed was greater with monensin (0.173) than with PFA (0.161) and for the control (0.156). During finishing, ADG, G:F, and carcass traits did not differ, whereas DMI and acute proteins were lesser with monensin than with PFA and for the control.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Growing steers fed PFA had similar DMI and ADG but lesser G:F than did those given monensin. Both PFA and monensin resulted in similar growth performance and G:F in the finishing phase.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000678/pdf?md5=7c47d81c5b0c8e9e7f638a4c00ce8014&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286523000678-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究一种市产植物性饲料添加剂(PFA)对生长肥育肉牛生长性能、饲料效率、胴体性状、肝脓肿及免疫应答的影响。材料与方法选用45头安格斯杂交阉牛(初始体重= 272±20.5 kg),饲养在4.9 × 1.8 m的单栏内,采用完全随机区组设计,进行生长110 d和肥育120 d试验。牛被体重阻断,并被分配到3个处理中的1个:对照组(不含PFA和莫能菌素),PFA剂量为500毫克/头每天,或莫能菌素剂量为300毫克/头每天。每天1次自由饲喂TMR,生长期在第32、59和110天称重,肥育期只在开始和结束时称重。结果与讨论在生长过程中,DMI无显著差异;415 vs 403 kg)和日增重(数值;1.31 vs. 1.20 kg/d),但与莫能菌素组(体重= 422 kg,平均日增重= 1.38 kg/d)差异不显著。增重:莫能菌素组(0.173)高于PFA组(0.161)和对照组(0.156)。在肥育期间,平均日增重、G:F和胴体性状无显著差异,而莫能菌素组的DMI和急性蛋白含量低于PFA组和对照组。与给予莫能菌素相比,饲喂PFA的生长公牛具有相似的DMI和ADG,但G:F较低。PFA和莫能菌素在肥育期的生长性能和G:F相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of a phytogenic feed additive on growth performance, feed intake, and carcass traits of beef steers

Objective

This study examined the effects of a commercial phytogenic feed additive (PFA) on growth performance, feed efficiency, carcass traits, liver abscesses, and the immune response of growing and finishing steers.

Materials and Methods

Forty-five crossbred Angus steers (initial BW = 272 ± 20.5 kg) housed in individual pens (4.9 × 1.8 m) were used in a randomized complete block design in a 110-d growing and 120-d finishing experiment. Steers were blocked by BW and allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: control (without PFA and monensin), PFA at 500 mg/steer daily, or monensin at 300 mg/steer daily. Steers were fed a TMR ad libitum once daily and weighed on d 32, 59, and 110 in the growing phase but only at the beginning and the end of the finishing phase.

Results and Discussion

During growing, DMI did not differ, whereas final BW (trend; 415 vs. 403 kg) and ADG (numerically; 1.31 vs. 1.20 kg/d) were greater with PFA than control but did not differ from monensin (BW = 422 kg and ADG = 1.38 kg/d). Gain:feed was greater with monensin (0.173) than with PFA (0.161) and for the control (0.156). During finishing, ADG, G:F, and carcass traits did not differ, whereas DMI and acute proteins were lesser with monensin than with PFA and for the control.

Implications and Applications

Growing steers fed PFA had similar DMI and ADG but lesser G:F than did those given monensin. Both PFA and monensin resulted in similar growth performance and G:F in the finishing phase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信