饲养场牛干物质采食量随时间变化的评价方法

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
M.L. Galyean , PAS, K.E. Hales , PAS
{"title":"饲养场牛干物质采食量随时间变化的评价方法","authors":"M.L. Galyean ,&nbsp;PAS,&nbsp;K.E. Hales ,&nbsp;PAS","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Variation in DMI over time could be associated with performance and metabolic disorders in feedlot cattle, but methods of measuring DMI variation have not been adequately defined. Our objective was to evaluate methods of assessing DMI variation using simulated data, as well as data from a published feedlot experiment.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Two data sets were created to simulate DMI by pens of cattle over 100 d: one with the same mean DMI (9 kg/d) and SD that varied from 0.125 to 0.5 kg/d and the other with different mean DMI (9, 10, and 11 kg/d) and the same SD (0.25 kg) or CV (2.78%). Approaches to assess DMI variation included (1) the sum of daily Euclidean distance between DMI values (DIST); (2) the average of the absolute daily deviations in DMI (DEV); and (3) repeated measures analysis of DMI over days on feed to estimate variance and covariance. The DIST and DEV metrics were analyzed by ANOVA, with model residuals tested for normality. Treatments in the published feedlot experiment included management for ad libitum intake versus slick bunk management, factored with different bulk densities of steam-flaked corn (335 vs. 425 g/L).</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>All 3 methods identified differences (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.05) among SD groups with the same mean, whereas with different mean DMI that had the same SD, no differences (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.80) in DMI variation were observed. When the CV was held constant among the different mean DMI, all 3 methods identified differences (<em>P</em>≤ 0.05) between the greatest and least CV values. For the published data, all 3 methods detected an effect of bunk management on DMI variance (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.05), with greater variance for ad libitum versus slick bunk management.</p><p>Only repeated measures detected an effect of bulk density on DMI variance, with greater variance (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.05) for the 425 g/L treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Results suggest that all 3 methods can provide a tool for statistically assessing variation in DMI over time, potentially allowing for a greater understanding of how such variation affects growth performance and metabolic health of feedlot cattle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of methods to assess variation in dry matter intake over time in feedlot cattle\",\"authors\":\"M.L. Galyean ,&nbsp;PAS,&nbsp;K.E. Hales ,&nbsp;PAS\",\"doi\":\"10.15232/aas.2023-02461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Variation in DMI over time could be associated with performance and metabolic disorders in feedlot cattle, but methods of measuring DMI variation have not been adequately defined. Our objective was to evaluate methods of assessing DMI variation using simulated data, as well as data from a published feedlot experiment.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Two data sets were created to simulate DMI by pens of cattle over 100 d: one with the same mean DMI (9 kg/d) and SD that varied from 0.125 to 0.5 kg/d and the other with different mean DMI (9, 10, and 11 kg/d) and the same SD (0.25 kg) or CV (2.78%). Approaches to assess DMI variation included (1) the sum of daily Euclidean distance between DMI values (DIST); (2) the average of the absolute daily deviations in DMI (DEV); and (3) repeated measures analysis of DMI over days on feed to estimate variance and covariance. The DIST and DEV metrics were analyzed by ANOVA, with model residuals tested for normality. Treatments in the published feedlot experiment included management for ad libitum intake versus slick bunk management, factored with different bulk densities of steam-flaked corn (335 vs. 425 g/L).</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>All 3 methods identified differences (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.05) among SD groups with the same mean, whereas with different mean DMI that had the same SD, no differences (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.80) in DMI variation were observed. When the CV was held constant among the different mean DMI, all 3 methods identified differences (<em>P</em>≤ 0.05) between the greatest and least CV values. For the published data, all 3 methods detected an effect of bunk management on DMI variance (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.05), with greater variance for ad libitum versus slick bunk management.</p><p>Only repeated measures detected an effect of bulk density on DMI variance, with greater variance (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.05) for the 425 g/L treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Results suggest that all 3 methods can provide a tool for statistically assessing variation in DMI over time, potentially allowing for a greater understanding of how such variation affects growth performance and metabolic health of feedlot cattle.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的DMI随时间的变化可能与饲养场牛的生产性能和代谢紊乱有关,但测量DMI变化的方法尚未得到充分定义。我们的目的是评估使用模拟数据评估DMI变化的方法,以及来自已发表的饲养场实验的数据。材料与方法建立两个数据集模拟100 d以上牛栏的DMI,其中一个数据集具有相同的平均DMI (9 kg/d)和SD (0.125 ~ 0.5 kg/d),另一个数据集具有不同的平均DMI(9、10和11 kg/d)和相同的SD (0.25 kg)或CV(2.78%)。评估DMI变化的方法包括(1)DMI值之间的日欧几里得距离之和(DIST);(2) DMI (DEV)绝对日偏差的平均值;(3)对饲料日粮DMI进行重复测量分析,估计方差和协方差。对DIST和DEV指标进行方差分析,并对模型残差进行正态性检验。在已发表的饲养场试验中,处理包括自由采食管理和光滑铺位管理,考虑到不同的蒸汽片玉米堆积密度(335 g/L vs 425 g/L)。结果与讨论3种方法在SD值相同的组间均有差异(P≤0.05),而SD值相同的不同DMI值组间DMI差异无差异(P≥0.80)。当CV在不同的平均DMI之间保持不变时,3种方法均能识别CV最大值与最小值之间的差异(P≤0.05)。对于已发表的数据,所有3种方法都检测到铺位管理对DMI方差的影响(P≤0.05),任意铺位管理与光滑铺位管理的差异更大。只有重复测量检测到容重对DMI方差的影响,425 g/L处理的方差更大(P≤0.05)。结果表明,这三种方法都可以提供一种统计评估DMI随时间变化的工具,从而有可能更好地了解这种变化如何影响饲养场牛的生长性能和代谢健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of methods to assess variation in dry matter intake over time in feedlot cattle

Objective

Variation in DMI over time could be associated with performance and metabolic disorders in feedlot cattle, but methods of measuring DMI variation have not been adequately defined. Our objective was to evaluate methods of assessing DMI variation using simulated data, as well as data from a published feedlot experiment.

Materials and Methods

Two data sets were created to simulate DMI by pens of cattle over 100 d: one with the same mean DMI (9 kg/d) and SD that varied from 0.125 to 0.5 kg/d and the other with different mean DMI (9, 10, and 11 kg/d) and the same SD (0.25 kg) or CV (2.78%). Approaches to assess DMI variation included (1) the sum of daily Euclidean distance between DMI values (DIST); (2) the average of the absolute daily deviations in DMI (DEV); and (3) repeated measures analysis of DMI over days on feed to estimate variance and covariance. The DIST and DEV metrics were analyzed by ANOVA, with model residuals tested for normality. Treatments in the published feedlot experiment included management for ad libitum intake versus slick bunk management, factored with different bulk densities of steam-flaked corn (335 vs. 425 g/L).

Results and Discussion

All 3 methods identified differences (P ≤ 0.05) among SD groups with the same mean, whereas with different mean DMI that had the same SD, no differences (P ≥ 0.80) in DMI variation were observed. When the CV was held constant among the different mean DMI, all 3 methods identified differences (P≤ 0.05) between the greatest and least CV values. For the published data, all 3 methods detected an effect of bunk management on DMI variance (P ≤ 0.05), with greater variance for ad libitum versus slick bunk management.

Only repeated measures detected an effect of bulk density on DMI variance, with greater variance (P ≤ 0.05) for the 425 g/L treatment.

Implications and Applications

Results suggest that all 3 methods can provide a tool for statistically assessing variation in DMI over time, potentially allowing for a greater understanding of how such variation affects growth performance and metabolic health of feedlot cattle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信