PainDETECT在儿童慢性疼痛中的应用:它如何识别神经性疼痛及其特征?

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2023-11-28 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001109
Courtney W Hess, Amanda R Van Orden, Giulia Mesaroli, Jennifer N Stinson, David Borsook, Laura E Simons
{"title":"PainDETECT在儿童慢性疼痛中的应用:它如何识别神经性疼痛及其特征?","authors":"Courtney W Hess, Amanda R Van Orden, Giulia Mesaroli, Jennifer N Stinson, David Borsook, Laura E Simons","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neuropathic pain (NP) arises from nerve damage or disease, and when not defined, it can impair function and quality of life. Early detection allows for interventions that can enhance outcomes. Diagnosis of NP can be difficult if not properly evaluated. PainDETECT is a NP screening tool developed and successfully used in adults.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the validity of painDETECT in a pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescents and young adults (10-19 years old) completed painDETECT and quantitative sensory testing (QST), which assessed mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, common symptoms of NP. Pain diagnoses, including neuropathic pain (n = 10), were collected through documentation in the medical chart. Descriptive statistics were used to examine age, gender, pain diagnoses, and painDETECT scores. Kruskal-Wallis H tests were conducted to examine differences in QST results across painDETECT categorizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Youth with chronic pain (N = 110, M<sub>age</sub> = 15.08 ± 2.4 years, N<sub>female</sub> = 88) and peers without pain (N = 55, M<sub>age</sub> = 15.84 ± 3.9 years, N<sub>female</sub> = 39) completed the painDETECT. The painDETECT scores for youth with pain (M = 12.7 ± 6.76) were significantly higher than those for peers without pain (M = 2.05 ± 2.41). PainDETECT demonstrated 80% sensitivity and 33% specificity in a pediatric population. Individuals who screened positively on the PainDETECT had significantly higher mechanical allodynia (M = 0.640 ± 0.994) compared with those who screened negatively (M = 0.186 ± 0.499; <i>P</i> = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PainDETECT demonstrated the ability to screen for NP, and QST mechanical allodynia results were consistent with a positive NP screen. Results of the study offer preliminary support for the ongoing assessment of the painDETECT as a brief, inexpensive, and simple-to-use screening tool for pediatric patients with primary pain complaints.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of PainDETECT in pediatric chronic pain: how well does it identify neuropathic pain and its characteristics?\",\"authors\":\"Courtney W Hess, Amanda R Van Orden, Giulia Mesaroli, Jennifer N Stinson, David Borsook, Laura E Simons\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neuropathic pain (NP) arises from nerve damage or disease, and when not defined, it can impair function and quality of life. Early detection allows for interventions that can enhance outcomes. Diagnosis of NP can be difficult if not properly evaluated. PainDETECT is a NP screening tool developed and successfully used in adults.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the validity of painDETECT in a pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescents and young adults (10-19 years old) completed painDETECT and quantitative sensory testing (QST), which assessed mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, common symptoms of NP. Pain diagnoses, including neuropathic pain (n = 10), were collected through documentation in the medical chart. Descriptive statistics were used to examine age, gender, pain diagnoses, and painDETECT scores. Kruskal-Wallis H tests were conducted to examine differences in QST results across painDETECT categorizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Youth with chronic pain (N = 110, M<sub>age</sub> = 15.08 ± 2.4 years, N<sub>female</sub> = 88) and peers without pain (N = 55, M<sub>age</sub> = 15.84 ± 3.9 years, N<sub>female</sub> = 39) completed the painDETECT. The painDETECT scores for youth with pain (M = 12.7 ± 6.76) were significantly higher than those for peers without pain (M = 2.05 ± 2.41). PainDETECT demonstrated 80% sensitivity and 33% specificity in a pediatric population. Individuals who screened positively on the PainDETECT had significantly higher mechanical allodynia (M = 0.640 ± 0.994) compared with those who screened negatively (M = 0.186 ± 0.499; <i>P</i> = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PainDETECT demonstrated the ability to screen for NP, and QST mechanical allodynia results were consistent with a positive NP screen. Results of the study offer preliminary support for the ongoing assessment of the painDETECT as a brief, inexpensive, and simple-to-use screening tool for pediatric patients with primary pain complaints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经性疼痛(NP)是由神经损伤或疾病引起的,如果没有明确的定义,它可以损害功能和生活质量。早期发现有助于采取干预措施,提高治疗效果。诊断NP可能是困难的,如果没有适当的评估。PainDETECT是一种开发并成功用于成人NP筛查的工具。目的:我们评估painDETECT在儿科人群中的有效性。方法:青少年和年轻人(10-19岁)完成了painDETECT和定量感觉测试(QST),评估了NP的常见症状机械异常性痛和痛觉过敏。通过病历记录收集疼痛诊断,包括神经性疼痛(n = 10)。描述性统计用于检查年龄、性别、疼痛诊断和painDETECT评分。进行Kruskal-Wallis H测试以检查不同painDETECT分类中QST结果的差异。结果:有慢性疼痛的青年(N = 110,男= 15.08±2.4年,女= 88)和无疼痛的同龄人(N = 55,男= 15.84±3.9年,女= 39)完成了painDETECT。有疼痛的青少年的painDETECT评分(M = 12.7±6.76)显著高于无疼痛的同龄人(M = 2.05±2.41)。PainDETECT在儿科人群中显示出80%的敏感性和33%的特异性。PainDETECT筛查阳性个体的机械异常性痛发生率(M = 0.640±0.994)显著高于筛查阴性个体(M = 0.186±0.499;P = 0.016)。结论:PainDETECT显示了筛查NP的能力,QST机械异常性痛的结果与NP阳性筛查一致。该研究的结果为painDETECT作为一种简单、廉价、易于使用的儿科疼痛主诉筛查工具的持续评估提供了初步支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of PainDETECT in pediatric chronic pain: how well does it identify neuropathic pain and its characteristics?

Introduction: Neuropathic pain (NP) arises from nerve damage or disease, and when not defined, it can impair function and quality of life. Early detection allows for interventions that can enhance outcomes. Diagnosis of NP can be difficult if not properly evaluated. PainDETECT is a NP screening tool developed and successfully used in adults.

Objectives: We evaluated the validity of painDETECT in a pediatric population.

Methods: Adolescents and young adults (10-19 years old) completed painDETECT and quantitative sensory testing (QST), which assessed mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, common symptoms of NP. Pain diagnoses, including neuropathic pain (n = 10), were collected through documentation in the medical chart. Descriptive statistics were used to examine age, gender, pain diagnoses, and painDETECT scores. Kruskal-Wallis H tests were conducted to examine differences in QST results across painDETECT categorizations.

Results: Youth with chronic pain (N = 110, Mage = 15.08 ± 2.4 years, Nfemale = 88) and peers without pain (N = 55, Mage = 15.84 ± 3.9 years, Nfemale = 39) completed the painDETECT. The painDETECT scores for youth with pain (M = 12.7 ± 6.76) were significantly higher than those for peers without pain (M = 2.05 ± 2.41). PainDETECT demonstrated 80% sensitivity and 33% specificity in a pediatric population. Individuals who screened positively on the PainDETECT had significantly higher mechanical allodynia (M = 0.640 ± 0.994) compared with those who screened negatively (M = 0.186 ± 0.499; P = 0.016).

Conclusion: PainDETECT demonstrated the ability to screen for NP, and QST mechanical allodynia results were consistent with a positive NP screen. Results of the study offer preliminary support for the ongoing assessment of the painDETECT as a brief, inexpensive, and simple-to-use screening tool for pediatric patients with primary pain complaints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信