术前呼吸肌训练可降低心脏手术后肺部并发症的风险和住院时间:一项系统综述。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
José Francisco Cursino de Moura , Crystian Bitencourt Oliveira , Ana Paula Coelho Figueira Freire , Mark Russell Elkins , Francis Lopes Pacagnelli
{"title":"术前呼吸肌训练可降低心脏手术后肺部并发症的风险和住院时间:一项系统综述。","authors":"José Francisco Cursino de Moura ,&nbsp;Crystian Bitencourt Oliveira ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Coelho Figueira Freire ,&nbsp;Mark Russell Elkins ,&nbsp;Francis Lopes Pacagnelli","doi":"10.1016/j.jphys.2023.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Questions</h3><p>What is the effect of preoperative respiratory muscle training (RMT) on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after open cardiac surgery? What is the effect of RMT on the duration of mechanical ventilation, postoperative length of stay and respiratory muscle strength?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults undergoing elective open cardiac surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The experimental groups received preoperative RMT and the comparison groups received no intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes were PPCs, length of hospital stay, respiratory muscle strength, oxygenation and duration of mechanical ventilation. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the PEDro scale and the overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight trials involving 696 participants were included. Compared with the control group, the respiratory training group had fewer PPCs (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.70), less pneumonia (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.78), shorter hospital stay (MD −1.7 days, 95% CI −2.4 to −1.1) and higher maximal inspiratory pressure values at the end of the training protocol (MD 12 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI 8 to 16). The mechanical ventilation time was similar in both groups. The quality of evidence was high for pneumonia, length of hospital stay and maximal inspiratory pressure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoperative RMT reduced the risk of PPCs and pneumonia after cardiac surgery. The training also improved the maximal inspiratory pressure and reduced hospital stay. The effects on PPCs were large enough to warrant use of RMT in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>CRD42021227779</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"70 1","pages":"Pages 16-24"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955323001170/pdfft?md5=bec5de692bccdf3eaee5f11b9fb8d31e&pid=1-s2.0-S1836955323001170-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative respiratory muscle training reduces the risk of pulmonary complications and the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"José Francisco Cursino de Moura ,&nbsp;Crystian Bitencourt Oliveira ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Coelho Figueira Freire ,&nbsp;Mark Russell Elkins ,&nbsp;Francis Lopes Pacagnelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jphys.2023.10.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Questions</h3><p>What is the effect of preoperative respiratory muscle training (RMT) on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after open cardiac surgery? What is the effect of RMT on the duration of mechanical ventilation, postoperative length of stay and respiratory muscle strength?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults undergoing elective open cardiac surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The experimental groups received preoperative RMT and the comparison groups received no intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes were PPCs, length of hospital stay, respiratory muscle strength, oxygenation and duration of mechanical ventilation. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the PEDro scale and the overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight trials involving 696 participants were included. Compared with the control group, the respiratory training group had fewer PPCs (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.70), less pneumonia (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.78), shorter hospital stay (MD −1.7 days, 95% CI −2.4 to −1.1) and higher maximal inspiratory pressure values at the end of the training protocol (MD 12 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI 8 to 16). The mechanical ventilation time was similar in both groups. The quality of evidence was high for pneumonia, length of hospital stay and maximal inspiratory pressure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoperative RMT reduced the risk of PPCs and pneumonia after cardiac surgery. The training also improved the maximal inspiratory pressure and reduced hospital stay. The effects on PPCs were large enough to warrant use of RMT in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>CRD42021227779</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955323001170/pdfft?md5=bec5de692bccdf3eaee5f11b9fb8d31e&pid=1-s2.0-S1836955323001170-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955323001170\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955323001170","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:术前呼吸肌训练(RMT)对心脏直视手术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的发生率有何影响?RMT对机械通气时间、术后停留时间和呼吸肌力量有何影响?设计:采用荟萃分析对随机试验进行系统评价。参与者:接受择期心脏直视手术的成年人。干预:实验组术前行RMT治疗,对照组不进行干预。结局指标:主要结局为PPCs、住院时间、呼吸肌力量、氧合和机械通气持续时间。使用PEDro量表评估研究的方法学质量,使用GRADE方法评估证据的总体确定性。结果:纳入8项试验,696名受试者。与对照组相比,呼吸训练组PPCs发生率较低(RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 ~ 0.70),肺炎发生率较低(RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 ~ 0.78),住院时间较短(MD -1.7天,95% CI -2.4 ~ -1.1),训练方案结束时最大吸气压力值较高(MD 12 cmH2O, 95% CI 8 ~ 16)。两组患者机械通气时间相似。肺炎、住院时间和最大吸气压力的证据质量较高。结论:术前RMT可降低心脏手术后PPCs和肺炎的发生风险。该训练还提高了最大吸气压力,缩短了住院时间。对PPCs的影响足够大,足以保证在该人群中使用RMT。注册:CRD42021227779。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative respiratory muscle training reduces the risk of pulmonary complications and the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Questions

What is the effect of preoperative respiratory muscle training (RMT) on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after open cardiac surgery? What is the effect of RMT on the duration of mechanical ventilation, postoperative length of stay and respiratory muscle strength?

Design

Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis.

Participants

Adults undergoing elective open cardiac surgery.

Intervention

The experimental groups received preoperative RMT and the comparison groups received no intervention.

Outcome measures

The primary outcomes were PPCs, length of hospital stay, respiratory muscle strength, oxygenation and duration of mechanical ventilation. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the PEDro scale and the overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

Results

Eight trials involving 696 participants were included. Compared with the control group, the respiratory training group had fewer PPCs (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.70), less pneumonia (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.78), shorter hospital stay (MD −1.7 days, 95% CI −2.4 to −1.1) and higher maximal inspiratory pressure values at the end of the training protocol (MD 12 cmH2O, 95% CI 8 to 16). The mechanical ventilation time was similar in both groups. The quality of evidence was high for pneumonia, length of hospital stay and maximal inspiratory pressure.

Conclusion

Preoperative RMT reduced the risk of PPCs and pneumonia after cardiac surgery. The training also improved the maximal inspiratory pressure and reduced hospital stay. The effects on PPCs were large enough to warrant use of RMT in this population.

Registration

CRD42021227779

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiotherapy
Journal of Physiotherapy ORTHOPEDICS-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiotherapy is the official journal of the Australian Physiotherapy Association. It aims to publish high-quality research with a significant impact on global physiotherapy practice. The journal's vision is to lead the field in supporting clinicians to access, understand, and implement research evidence that will enhance person-centred care. In January 2008, the Journal of Physiotherapy became the first physiotherapy journal to adhere to the ICMJE requirement of registering randomized trials with a recognized Trial Registry. The journal prioritizes systematic reviews, clinical trials, economic analyses, experimental studies, qualitative studies, epidemiological studies, and observational studies. In January 2014, it also became the first core physiotherapy/physical therapy journal to provide free access to editorials and peer-reviewed original research. The Australian Physiotherapy Association extended their support for excellence in physiotherapy practice by sponsoring open access publication of all Journal of Physiotherapy content in 2016. As a result, all past, present, and future journal articles are freely accessible, and there are no author fees for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信