Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen, Søren T Skou, Anette Enemark Larsen, Romanas Polianskis, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Anne Skov Østergaard, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Henrik Bjarke Vægter, Jens Søndergaard, Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen
{"title":"职业治疗生活方式干预后疼痛、日常职业、生活方式和健康的变化:来自慢性高冲击性疼痛患者可行性研究的二次分析","authors":"Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen, Søren T Skou, Anette Enemark Larsen, Romanas Polianskis, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Anne Skov Østergaard, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Henrik Bjarke Vægter, Jens Søndergaard, Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored changes in pain-related parameters, occupational function, occupational balance, lifestyle factors, and self-perceived health status in adults with chronic high-impact pain participating in an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This one-group longitudinal feasibility study was performed in three continuous feasibility rounds. The occupational therapists-led intervention targeted meaningful occupations, regular physical activity, and a healthy diet. The intervention contained individual and group sessions and was added to the standard multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment. Outpatients (n=40, 85 % females, 46.6 ± 10.9 years old) participated in the study between April 2019 and December 2021. The analysis includes data for 31 participants. Analysis of pre-post changes assessed after each feasibility round were performed for the outcomes: pain intensity, pain sensitivity and pain modulation (pressure pain threshold and tolerance, temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation), pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, motor and process skills, occupational balance, daily wake-time movement, daily walking steps, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, and self-perceived health status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Improvements in motor skills (assessment of motor and process skills score=0.20 (1.37; 1.57), 95 % CI 0.01; 0.38) and temporal summation of pain (-1.19 (2.86; -1.67), 95 % CI -2.16; -0.22), but a decrease in pain tolerance (-7.110 (54.42; 47.32), 95 % CI -13.99; -0.22) were observed. Correlation analysis suggested moderate-to-very strong statistically significant relationships in several outcomes related to pain, health, pain coping, occupational balance, occupational functioning, body anthropometrics, and pain sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that the lifestyle intervention would benefit motor skills while effects on other outcomes were unclear in adults with chronic pain. To confirm the findings, a randomized trial evaluating effectiveness is needed. <b>Ethical committee number:</b> SJ-307 <b>Reg. Clinicaltrials.gov:</b> NCT03903900.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in pain, daily occupations, lifestyle, and health following an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention: a secondary analysis from a feasibility study in patients with chronic high-impact pain.\",\"authors\":\"Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen, Søren T Skou, Anette Enemark Larsen, Romanas Polianskis, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Anne Skov Østergaard, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Henrik Bjarke Vægter, Jens Søndergaard, Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored changes in pain-related parameters, occupational function, occupational balance, lifestyle factors, and self-perceived health status in adults with chronic high-impact pain participating in an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This one-group longitudinal feasibility study was performed in three continuous feasibility rounds. The occupational therapists-led intervention targeted meaningful occupations, regular physical activity, and a healthy diet. The intervention contained individual and group sessions and was added to the standard multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment. Outpatients (n=40, 85 % females, 46.6 ± 10.9 years old) participated in the study between April 2019 and December 2021. The analysis includes data for 31 participants. Analysis of pre-post changes assessed after each feasibility round were performed for the outcomes: pain intensity, pain sensitivity and pain modulation (pressure pain threshold and tolerance, temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation), pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, motor and process skills, occupational balance, daily wake-time movement, daily walking steps, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, and self-perceived health status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Improvements in motor skills (assessment of motor and process skills score=0.20 (1.37; 1.57), 95 % CI 0.01; 0.38) and temporal summation of pain (-1.19 (2.86; -1.67), 95 % CI -2.16; -0.22), but a decrease in pain tolerance (-7.110 (54.42; 47.32), 95 % CI -13.99; -0.22) were observed. Correlation analysis suggested moderate-to-very strong statistically significant relationships in several outcomes related to pain, health, pain coping, occupational balance, occupational functioning, body anthropometrics, and pain sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that the lifestyle intervention would benefit motor skills while effects on other outcomes were unclear in adults with chronic pain. To confirm the findings, a randomized trial evaluating effectiveness is needed. <b>Ethical committee number:</b> SJ-307 <b>Reg. Clinicaltrials.gov:</b> NCT03903900.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究探讨成人慢性高冲击性疼痛患者参与职业治疗生活方式干预后疼痛相关参数、职业功能、职业平衡、生活方式因素和自我感知健康状况的变化。方法:采用单组纵向可行性研究,连续进行3轮可行性研究。职业治疗师主导的干预针对有意义的职业、定期的身体活动和健康的饮食。干预包括个人和小组会议,并被添加到标准的多学科慢性疼痛治疗。2019年4月至2021年12月,门诊患者(n=40, 85 %女性,46.6±10.9 岁)参与了研究。该分析包括31名参与者的数据。分析每轮可行性评估后的结果:疼痛强度、疼痛敏感性和疼痛调节(压力痛阈值和耐受性、疼痛的时间总和和条理性疼痛调节)、疼痛自我效能、疼痛灾难化、运动和过程技能、职业平衡、每日清醒时运动、每日步行步数、体重指数、腰围、血压和自我感知健康状况。结果:运动技能的改善(运动和加工技能评估得分=0.20;1.57), 95 % ci 0.01;0.38)和疼痛时间总和(-1.19 (2.86;-1.67), 95 % ci -2.16;-0.22),但疼痛耐受性下降(-7.110 (54.42;47.32), 95 % ci -13.99;-0.22)。相关分析表明,与疼痛、健康、疼痛应对、职业平衡、职业功能、人体测量学和疼痛敏感性相关的几个结果存在中等到非常强的统计学显著关系。结论:这项研究表明,生活方式干预将有利于运动技能,而对成人慢性疼痛的其他结果的影响尚不清楚。为了证实这些发现,需要进行随机试验来评估其有效性。伦理委员会编号:SJ-307Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03903900。
Changes in pain, daily occupations, lifestyle, and health following an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention: a secondary analysis from a feasibility study in patients with chronic high-impact pain.
Objectives: This study explored changes in pain-related parameters, occupational function, occupational balance, lifestyle factors, and self-perceived health status in adults with chronic high-impact pain participating in an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention.
Methods: This one-group longitudinal feasibility study was performed in three continuous feasibility rounds. The occupational therapists-led intervention targeted meaningful occupations, regular physical activity, and a healthy diet. The intervention contained individual and group sessions and was added to the standard multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment. Outpatients (n=40, 85 % females, 46.6 ± 10.9 years old) participated in the study between April 2019 and December 2021. The analysis includes data for 31 participants. Analysis of pre-post changes assessed after each feasibility round were performed for the outcomes: pain intensity, pain sensitivity and pain modulation (pressure pain threshold and tolerance, temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation), pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, motor and process skills, occupational balance, daily wake-time movement, daily walking steps, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, and self-perceived health status.
Results: Improvements in motor skills (assessment of motor and process skills score=0.20 (1.37; 1.57), 95 % CI 0.01; 0.38) and temporal summation of pain (-1.19 (2.86; -1.67), 95 % CI -2.16; -0.22), but a decrease in pain tolerance (-7.110 (54.42; 47.32), 95 % CI -13.99; -0.22) were observed. Correlation analysis suggested moderate-to-very strong statistically significant relationships in several outcomes related to pain, health, pain coping, occupational balance, occupational functioning, body anthropometrics, and pain sensitivity.
Conclusions: This study suggested that the lifestyle intervention would benefit motor skills while effects on other outcomes were unclear in adults with chronic pain. To confirm the findings, a randomized trial evaluating effectiveness is needed. Ethical committee number: SJ-307 Reg. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03903900.