局部治疗联合全身治疗(LRT + ST)治疗不可切除和转移性肝内胆管癌:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Radiology and Oncology Pub Date : 2023-11-30 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.2478/raon-2023-0059
Mengqi Zhang, Weiwei Qi, Xiaofei Qiu, Chunpeng Yu, Wensheng Qiu, Song Wang, Zhenkang Qiu
{"title":"局部治疗联合全身治疗(LRT + ST)治疗不可切除和转移性肝内胆管癌:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Mengqi Zhang, Weiwei Qi, Xiaofei Qiu, Chunpeng Yu, Wensheng Qiu, Song Wang, Zhenkang Qiu","doi":"10.2478/raon-2023-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outcome of systemic therapy (ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is poor. This study aims to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) compared with only ST in unresectable and metastatic iCCA by performing a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 3, 2022. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten retrospective cohort studies with 3,791 unresectable or metastatic iCCA patients were enrolled in this study, including 1,120 who received ablation, arterially directed therapy (ADT), or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with ST. The meta-analysis showed that the LRT + ST group had a better OS (<i>HR</i> = 0.51; <i>95% CI</i> =0.41-0.64; <i>p value</i> < 0.001), PFS (<i>HR</i> = 0.40, <i>95% CI</i> = 0.22-0.71, <i>p value</i> = 0.002) and ORR (<i>RR</i> = 1.68; <i>95% CI</i> = 1.17-2.42; <i>p value</i> = 0.005). Subgroup analysis showed that both ST combined with ADT (<i>HR</i> = 0.42, <i>95% CI</i> = 0.31-0.56, <i>p value</i> < 0.001) and EBRT (<i>HR</i> = 0.67, <i>95% CI</i> = 0.63-0.72, <i>p value</i> < 0.001) could improve OS. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, anorexia, and vomiting did not show significant differences between the groups (p value > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with only ST, LRT + ST improved survival outcomes for unresectable and metastatic iCCA patients without increasing severe AEs, which can further provide a basis for guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":"57 4","pages":"419-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mengqi Zhang, Weiwei Qi, Xiaofei Qiu, Chunpeng Yu, Wensheng Qiu, Song Wang, Zhenkang Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/raon-2023-0059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outcome of systemic therapy (ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is poor. This study aims to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) compared with only ST in unresectable and metastatic iCCA by performing a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 3, 2022. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten retrospective cohort studies with 3,791 unresectable or metastatic iCCA patients were enrolled in this study, including 1,120 who received ablation, arterially directed therapy (ADT), or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with ST. The meta-analysis showed that the LRT + ST group had a better OS (<i>HR</i> = 0.51; <i>95% CI</i> =0.41-0.64; <i>p value</i> < 0.001), PFS (<i>HR</i> = 0.40, <i>95% CI</i> = 0.22-0.71, <i>p value</i> = 0.002) and ORR (<i>RR</i> = 1.68; <i>95% CI</i> = 1.17-2.42; <i>p value</i> = 0.005). Subgroup analysis showed that both ST combined with ADT (<i>HR</i> = 0.42, <i>95% CI</i> = 0.31-0.56, <i>p value</i> < 0.001) and EBRT (<i>HR</i> = 0.67, <i>95% CI</i> = 0.63-0.72, <i>p value</i> < 0.001) could improve OS. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, anorexia, and vomiting did not show significant differences between the groups (p value > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with only ST, LRT + ST improved survival outcomes for unresectable and metastatic iCCA patients without increasing severe AEs, which can further provide a basis for guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"419-429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690746/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0059\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不可切除和转移性肝内胆管癌(iCCA)的全身治疗(ST)的结果很差。本研究旨在通过系统的文献回顾和荟萃分析,进一步评估局部局部治疗联合全身治疗(LRT + ST)与单纯ST治疗不可切除和转移性iCCA的疗效和安全性。方法:综合检索PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE和Cochrane Library,检索截止到2022年11月3日。主要终点是总生存期(OS),次要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和不良事件(ae)。结果:10项回顾性队列研究纳入了3791例不可切除或转移性iCCA患者,其中1120例接受了消融、动脉定向治疗(ADT)或外束放射治疗(EBRT)联合ST治疗。meta分析显示,LRT + ST组有更好的OS (HR = 0.51;95% ci =0.41-0.64;p值< 0.001)、PFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22-0.71, p值= 0.002)和ORR (RR = 1.68;95% ci = 1.17-2.42;P值= 0.005)。亚组分析显示,ST联合ADT (HR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.31-0.56, p值< 0.001)和EBRT (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.63-0.72, p值< 0.001)均可改善OS。中性粒细胞减少症、血小板减少症、贫血、厌食症、呕吐在组间无显著性差异(p值> 0.05)。结论:与单纯ST相比,LRT + ST改善了不可切除和转移性iCCA患者的生存结局,且未增加严重ae,可进一步为指南提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The outcome of systemic therapy (ST) for unresectable and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is poor. This study aims to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of locoregional therapy combined with systemic therapy (LRT + ST) compared with only ST in unresectable and metastatic iCCA by performing a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 3, 2022. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results: Ten retrospective cohort studies with 3,791 unresectable or metastatic iCCA patients were enrolled in this study, including 1,120 who received ablation, arterially directed therapy (ADT), or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with ST. The meta-analysis showed that the LRT + ST group had a better OS (HR = 0.51; 95% CI =0.41-0.64; p value < 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22-0.71, p value = 0.002) and ORR (RR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.17-2.42; p value = 0.005). Subgroup analysis showed that both ST combined with ADT (HR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.31-0.56, p value < 0.001) and EBRT (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.63-0.72, p value < 0.001) could improve OS. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, anorexia, and vomiting did not show significant differences between the groups (p value > 0.05).

Conclusions: Compared with only ST, LRT + ST improved survival outcomes for unresectable and metastatic iCCA patients without increasing severe AEs, which can further provide a basis for guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信