体积重扫和分割治疗对肝癌质子治疗剂量均匀性影响的研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Pei-Yi Lee, Bing-Shen Huang, Shen-Hao Lee, Tsz-Yui Chan, Eric Yen, Tsair-Fwu Lee, I-Chun Cho
{"title":"体积重扫和分割治疗对肝癌质子治疗剂量均匀性影响的研究。","authors":"Pei-Yi Lee, Bing-Shen Huang, Shen-Hao Lee, Tsz-Yui Chan, Eric Yen, Tsair-Fwu Lee, I-Chun Cho","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rrad093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) technique in modern particle therapy offers a highly conformal dose distribution but poses challenges due to the interplay effect, an interaction between respiration-induced organ movement and PBS. This study evaluates the effectiveness of different volumetric rescanning strategies in mitigating this effect in liver cancer proton therapy. We used a Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation toolkit, 'TOPAS,' and an image registration toolbox, 'Elastix,' to calculate 4D dose distributions from 5 patients' four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). We analyzed the homogeneity index (HI) value of the Clinical Tumor Volume (CTV) at different rescan numbers and treatment times. Our results indicate that dose homogeneity stabilizes at a low point after a week of treatment, implying that both rescanning and fractionation treatments help mitigate the interplay effect. Notably, an increase in the number of rescans doesn't significantly reduce the mean dose to normal tissue but effectively prevents high localized doses to tissue adjacent to the CTV. Rescanning techniques, based on statistical averaging, require no extra equipment or patient cooperation, making them widely accessible. However, the number of rescans, tumor location, diaphragm movement, and treatment fractionation significantly influence their effectiveness. Therefore, deciding the number of rescans should involve considering the number of beams, treatment fraction size, and total delivery time to avoid unnecessary treatment extension without significant clinical benefits. The results showed that 2-3 rescans are more clinically suitable for liver cancer patients undergoing proton therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"100-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation into the impact of volumetric rescanning and fractionation treatment on dose homogeneity in liver cancer proton therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Yi Lee, Bing-Shen Huang, Shen-Hao Lee, Tsz-Yui Chan, Eric Yen, Tsair-Fwu Lee, I-Chun Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrr/rrad093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) technique in modern particle therapy offers a highly conformal dose distribution but poses challenges due to the interplay effect, an interaction between respiration-induced organ movement and PBS. This study evaluates the effectiveness of different volumetric rescanning strategies in mitigating this effect in liver cancer proton therapy. We used a Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation toolkit, 'TOPAS,' and an image registration toolbox, 'Elastix,' to calculate 4D dose distributions from 5 patients' four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). We analyzed the homogeneity index (HI) value of the Clinical Tumor Volume (CTV) at different rescan numbers and treatment times. Our results indicate that dose homogeneity stabilizes at a low point after a week of treatment, implying that both rescanning and fractionation treatments help mitigate the interplay effect. Notably, an increase in the number of rescans doesn't significantly reduce the mean dose to normal tissue but effectively prevents high localized doses to tissue adjacent to the CTV. Rescanning techniques, based on statistical averaging, require no extra equipment or patient cooperation, making them widely accessible. However, the number of rescans, tumor location, diaphragm movement, and treatment fractionation significantly influence their effectiveness. Therefore, deciding the number of rescans should involve considering the number of beams, treatment fraction size, and total delivery time to avoid unnecessary treatment extension without significant clinical benefits. The results showed that 2-3 rescans are more clinically suitable for liver cancer patients undergoing proton therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrad093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrad093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

铅笔束扫描(PBS)技术在现代粒子治疗中提供了高度适形的剂量分布,但由于呼吸诱导的器官运动和PBS之间的相互作用而面临挑战。本研究评估了不同体积重扫描策略在肝癌质子治疗中减轻这种影响的有效性。我们使用基于geant4的蒙特卡罗模拟工具包“TOPAS”和图像配准工具箱“Elastix”来计算5名患者的四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)的四维剂量分布。我们分析了临床肿瘤体积(CTV)在不同重新扫描次数和治疗时间下的均匀性指数(HI)值。我们的研究结果表明,剂量均匀性在治疗一周后稳定在低点,这意味着重新扫描和分步治疗都有助于减轻相互作用。值得注意的是,重新扫描次数的增加并没有显著降低正常组织的平均剂量,但有效地防止了CTV附近组织的高局部剂量。基于统计平均的重新扫描技术不需要额外的设备或患者的合作,因此可以广泛使用。然而,扫描次数、肿瘤位置、横膈膜运动和治疗分级显著影响其有效性。因此,在决定重扫描次数时,应考虑到光束数、治疗分数大小和总递送时间,以避免在没有显著临床效益的情况下不必要地延长治疗时间。结果显示,2-3个扫描在临床上更适合肝癌患者接受质子治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An investigation into the impact of volumetric rescanning and fractionation treatment on dose homogeneity in liver cancer proton therapy.

The Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) technique in modern particle therapy offers a highly conformal dose distribution but poses challenges due to the interplay effect, an interaction between respiration-induced organ movement and PBS. This study evaluates the effectiveness of different volumetric rescanning strategies in mitigating this effect in liver cancer proton therapy. We used a Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation toolkit, 'TOPAS,' and an image registration toolbox, 'Elastix,' to calculate 4D dose distributions from 5 patients' four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). We analyzed the homogeneity index (HI) value of the Clinical Tumor Volume (CTV) at different rescan numbers and treatment times. Our results indicate that dose homogeneity stabilizes at a low point after a week of treatment, implying that both rescanning and fractionation treatments help mitigate the interplay effect. Notably, an increase in the number of rescans doesn't significantly reduce the mean dose to normal tissue but effectively prevents high localized doses to tissue adjacent to the CTV. Rescanning techniques, based on statistical averaging, require no extra equipment or patient cooperation, making them widely accessible. However, the number of rescans, tumor location, diaphragm movement, and treatment fractionation significantly influence their effectiveness. Therefore, deciding the number of rescans should involve considering the number of beams, treatment fraction size, and total delivery time to avoid unnecessary treatment extension without significant clinical benefits. The results showed that 2-3 rescans are more clinically suitable for liver cancer patients undergoing proton therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信