加拿大肾脏病学会临床实践指南主题与多学科利益相关者和肾病患者的确定和优先顺序:临床研究方案。

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease Pub Date : 2023-11-24 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20543581231207142
Brigitte H Baragar, Melissa Schorr, Nancy Verdin, Tania Woodlock, David A Clark, Gregory L Hundemer, Anna Mathew, Reem A Mustafa, Krista S Ryz, Tyrone G Harrison
{"title":"加拿大肾脏病学会临床实践指南主题与多学科利益相关者和肾病患者的确定和优先顺序:临床研究方案。","authors":"Brigitte H Baragar, Melissa Schorr, Nancy Verdin, Tania Woodlock, David A Clark, Gregory L Hundemer, Anna Mathew, Reem A Mustafa, Krista S Ryz, Tyrone G Harrison","doi":"10.1177/20543581231207142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite efforts to provide evidence-based care for people living with kidney disease, health care provider goals and priorities are often misaligned with those of individuals with lived experience of disease. Coupled with competing interests of time, resources, and an abundance of suitable guideline topics, identifying and prioritizing areas of focus for the Canadian nephrology community with a patient-oriented perspective is necessary and important. Similar priority-setting exercises have been undertaken to establish research priorities for kidney disease and to standardize outcomes for kidney disease research and clinical care; however, research priorities are distinct from priorities for guideline development. Inclusion of people living with health conditions in the selection and prioritization of guideline topics is suggested by patient engagement frameworks, though the process to operationalizing this is variable. We propose that the Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Committee (CSN CPGC) takes the opportunity at this juncture to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with involvement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to inform future guideline activities. In this protocol, we describe our planned research methods to address this. Objective: To establish consensus-based guideline topic priorities for the CSN CPGC using a modified Delphi survey with involvement of multidisciplinary stakeholders, including people living with kidney disease and their caregivers. Study design: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Survey. Setting: Pilot-tested surveys will be distributed via email and conducted using the online platform SurveyMonkey, in both French and English. Participants: We will establish a group of multidisciplinary clinical and research stakeholders (both within and outside CSN membership) from Canada, in addition to people living with kidney disease and/or their caregivers. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted to generate an initial list of guideline topics, which will be organized into three main categories: (1) International nephrology-focused guidelines that may require Canadian commentary, (2) Non-nephrology specific guidelines from Canada that may require CSN commentary, and (3) Novel topics for guideline development. Participants will engage in a multi-round Modified Delphi Survey to prioritize a set of “important guideline topics.” Measures: Consensus will be reached for an item based on both median score on the Likert-type scale (≥ 7) and the percentage agreement (≥ 75%); the Delphi process will be complete when consensus is reached on each item. Guideline topics will then be given a priority score calculated from the total Likert ratings across participants, adjusted for the number of participants. Limitations: Potential limitations include participant response rates and compliance to survey completion. Conclusions: We propose to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with the engagement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to establish consensus-based guideline topics and inform future guidelines activities of the CSN CPGC.","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"10 ","pages":"20543581231207142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification and Prioritization of Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Topics With Multidisciplinary Stakeholders and People Living With Kidney Disease: A Clinical Research Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Brigitte H Baragar, Melissa Schorr, Nancy Verdin, Tania Woodlock, David A Clark, Gregory L Hundemer, Anna Mathew, Reem A Mustafa, Krista S Ryz, Tyrone G Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20543581231207142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Despite efforts to provide evidence-based care for people living with kidney disease, health care provider goals and priorities are often misaligned with those of individuals with lived experience of disease. Coupled with competing interests of time, resources, and an abundance of suitable guideline topics, identifying and prioritizing areas of focus for the Canadian nephrology community with a patient-oriented perspective is necessary and important. Similar priority-setting exercises have been undertaken to establish research priorities for kidney disease and to standardize outcomes for kidney disease research and clinical care; however, research priorities are distinct from priorities for guideline development. Inclusion of people living with health conditions in the selection and prioritization of guideline topics is suggested by patient engagement frameworks, though the process to operationalizing this is variable. We propose that the Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Committee (CSN CPGC) takes the opportunity at this juncture to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with involvement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to inform future guideline activities. In this protocol, we describe our planned research methods to address this. Objective: To establish consensus-based guideline topic priorities for the CSN CPGC using a modified Delphi survey with involvement of multidisciplinary stakeholders, including people living with kidney disease and their caregivers. Study design: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Survey. Setting: Pilot-tested surveys will be distributed via email and conducted using the online platform SurveyMonkey, in both French and English. Participants: We will establish a group of multidisciplinary clinical and research stakeholders (both within and outside CSN membership) from Canada, in addition to people living with kidney disease and/or their caregivers. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted to generate an initial list of guideline topics, which will be organized into three main categories: (1) International nephrology-focused guidelines that may require Canadian commentary, (2) Non-nephrology specific guidelines from Canada that may require CSN commentary, and (3) Novel topics for guideline development. Participants will engage in a multi-round Modified Delphi Survey to prioritize a set of “important guideline topics.” Measures: Consensus will be reached for an item based on both median score on the Likert-type scale (≥ 7) and the percentage agreement (≥ 75%); the Delphi process will be complete when consensus is reached on each item. Guideline topics will then be given a priority score calculated from the total Likert ratings across participants, adjusted for the number of participants. Limitations: Potential limitations include participant response rates and compliance to survey completion. Conclusions: We propose to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with the engagement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to establish consensus-based guideline topics and inform future guidelines activities of the CSN CPGC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"20543581231207142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581231207142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581231207142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管努力为肾脏疾病患者提供循证护理,但卫生保健提供者的目标和优先事项往往与有疾病生活经历的个体不一致。再加上时间、资源和大量合适的指南主题的竞争利益,以患者为导向的角度确定和优先考虑加拿大肾脏病学界的重点领域是必要和重要的。已经开展了类似的确定优先事项的工作,以确定肾脏疾病的研究重点,并使肾脏疾病研究和临床护理的结果标准化;然而,研究重点与指南制定的重点是不同的。患者参与框架建议将有健康问题的人纳入指南主题的选择和优先顺序,尽管实施这一框架的过程是可变的。我们建议加拿大肾脏病学会临床实践指南委员会(CSN CPGC)抓住这个机会,在肾脏疾病患者及其护理人员的参与下,将循证优先练习纳入未来的指南活动中。在本协议中,我们描述了我们计划的研究方法来解决这个问题。目的:利用多学科利益相关者(包括肾脏疾病患者及其护理者)参与的改进德尔菲调查,为CSN CPGC建立基于共识的指南主题优先级。研究设计:修改德尔菲调查方案。设置:试点测试的调查将通过电子邮件分发,并使用在线平台SurveyMonkey进行,使用法语和英语。参与者:除了肾脏疾病患者和/或其护理者外,我们将建立一个由加拿大的多学科临床和研究利益相关者(包括CSN成员内部和外部)组成的小组。方法:将进行全面的文献检索,以生成指南主题的初始列表,该列表将分为三大类:(1)可能需要加拿大评论的国际肾脏病学指南,(2)可能需要CSN评论的加拿大非肾脏病学指南,以及(3)指南开发的新主题。参与者将参与多轮修改德尔菲调查,以确定一组“重要指导主题”的优先级。措施:将根据李克特量表的中位数得分(≥7)和同意百分比(≥75%)就一个项目达成共识;德尔菲程序将在每个项目达成共识时完成。然后,根据参与者的总李克特评分计算出指南主题的优先级分数,并根据参与者的数量进行调整。局限性:潜在的局限性包括参与者的回复率和调查完成的依从性。结论:我们建议将循证优先排序练习与肾脏疾病患者及其护理人员的参与结合起来,以建立基于共识的指南主题,并为CSN CPGC的未来指南活动提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification and Prioritization of Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Topics With Multidisciplinary Stakeholders and People Living With Kidney Disease: A Clinical Research Protocol.
Background: Despite efforts to provide evidence-based care for people living with kidney disease, health care provider goals and priorities are often misaligned with those of individuals with lived experience of disease. Coupled with competing interests of time, resources, and an abundance of suitable guideline topics, identifying and prioritizing areas of focus for the Canadian nephrology community with a patient-oriented perspective is necessary and important. Similar priority-setting exercises have been undertaken to establish research priorities for kidney disease and to standardize outcomes for kidney disease research and clinical care; however, research priorities are distinct from priorities for guideline development. Inclusion of people living with health conditions in the selection and prioritization of guideline topics is suggested by patient engagement frameworks, though the process to operationalizing this is variable. We propose that the Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Committee (CSN CPGC) takes the opportunity at this juncture to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with involvement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to inform future guideline activities. In this protocol, we describe our planned research methods to address this. Objective: To establish consensus-based guideline topic priorities for the CSN CPGC using a modified Delphi survey with involvement of multidisciplinary stakeholders, including people living with kidney disease and their caregivers. Study design: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Survey. Setting: Pilot-tested surveys will be distributed via email and conducted using the online platform SurveyMonkey, in both French and English. Participants: We will establish a group of multidisciplinary clinical and research stakeholders (both within and outside CSN membership) from Canada, in addition to people living with kidney disease and/or their caregivers. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted to generate an initial list of guideline topics, which will be organized into three main categories: (1) International nephrology-focused guidelines that may require Canadian commentary, (2) Non-nephrology specific guidelines from Canada that may require CSN commentary, and (3) Novel topics for guideline development. Participants will engage in a multi-round Modified Delphi Survey to prioritize a set of “important guideline topics.” Measures: Consensus will be reached for an item based on both median score on the Likert-type scale (≥ 7) and the percentage agreement (≥ 75%); the Delphi process will be complete when consensus is reached on each item. Guideline topics will then be given a priority score calculated from the total Likert ratings across participants, adjusted for the number of participants. Limitations: Potential limitations include participant response rates and compliance to survey completion. Conclusions: We propose to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with the engagement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to establish consensus-based guideline topics and inform future guidelines activities of the CSN CPGC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, the official journal of the Canadian Society of Nephrology, is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encourages high quality submissions focused on clinical, translational and health services delivery research in the field of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, kidney transplantation and organ donation. Our mandate is to promote and advocate for kidney health as it impacts national and international communities. Basic science, translational studies and clinical studies will be peer reviewed and processed by an Editorial Board comprised of geographically diverse Canadian and international nephrologists, internists and allied health professionals; this Editorial Board is mandated to ensure highest quality publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信