挪威奶牛群中对白尾鱼暴露评估诊断方法的比较。

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Tonje Opsal, Ingrid Toftaker, Lucy Robertson, Ian Woolsey, Lisbeth Hektoen
{"title":"挪威奶牛群中对白尾鱼暴露评估诊断方法的比较。","authors":"Tonje Opsal, Ingrid Toftaker, Lucy Robertson, Ian Woolsey, Lisbeth Hektoen","doi":"10.1186/s13028-023-00712-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) Ostertagia ostertagi can cause severe disease in first season grazers (FSG) and impaired performance due to subclinical infections in adult cows. Diagnostic methods to assess exposure include faecal egg count and detection of specific antibodies using antibody-ELISAs resulting in an optical density ratio (ODR). Using the ELISA test on bulk tank milk (BTM) allows for a herd level diagnosis. Appropriate use of diagnostic methods for evaluation of O. ostertagi exposure is required to optimize herd parasite surveillance and aid in a sustainable control regime. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between different diagnostic tests used to assess GIN exposure in Norwegian production systems. A cross-sectional field study was carried out in twenty herds in Norway in the fall of 2020. Serum and faecal samples were taken from 380 individuals, of which 181 were FSG and 199 were cows. In addition, milk was collected from every cow and one BTM sample was taken from each herd. Faecal egg counts were performed. The distribution of ODR values in individual samples within and between herds and the associations between BTM ODR and individual ODR values were described. The data were analysed using visual assessment of scatter plots, Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A high variability of the within-herd individual ODR values in serum and milk in every herd was detected. The ODR in BTM explained a low degree of the variation in the individual serum and milk samples. When plotting the ODR results in milk or serum according to four BTM categories, the distribution of ODR values were notably different in the highest and lowest BTM categories. The correlation between individual milk and serum samples was moderate (r = 0.68), while the highest correlation (r = 0.81) was between the BTM ODR and the group average individual milk samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A poor predictive ability for BTM ODR to assess individual ODR values in both FSG and cows was demonstrated. However, the study indicates that the evaluation by ELISA test on BTM to assess exposure to GIN could be useful in herds with a very high or low BTM ODR.</p>","PeriodicalId":7181,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","volume":"65 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of diagnostic methods for assessment of Ostertagia ostertagi exposure in Norwegian dairy herds.\",\"authors\":\"Tonje Opsal, Ingrid Toftaker, Lucy Robertson, Ian Woolsey, Lisbeth Hektoen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13028-023-00712-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) Ostertagia ostertagi can cause severe disease in first season grazers (FSG) and impaired performance due to subclinical infections in adult cows. Diagnostic methods to assess exposure include faecal egg count and detection of specific antibodies using antibody-ELISAs resulting in an optical density ratio (ODR). Using the ELISA test on bulk tank milk (BTM) allows for a herd level diagnosis. Appropriate use of diagnostic methods for evaluation of O. ostertagi exposure is required to optimize herd parasite surveillance and aid in a sustainable control regime. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between different diagnostic tests used to assess GIN exposure in Norwegian production systems. A cross-sectional field study was carried out in twenty herds in Norway in the fall of 2020. Serum and faecal samples were taken from 380 individuals, of which 181 were FSG and 199 were cows. In addition, milk was collected from every cow and one BTM sample was taken from each herd. Faecal egg counts were performed. The distribution of ODR values in individual samples within and between herds and the associations between BTM ODR and individual ODR values were described. The data were analysed using visual assessment of scatter plots, Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A high variability of the within-herd individual ODR values in serum and milk in every herd was detected. The ODR in BTM explained a low degree of the variation in the individual serum and milk samples. When plotting the ODR results in milk or serum according to four BTM categories, the distribution of ODR values were notably different in the highest and lowest BTM categories. The correlation between individual milk and serum samples was moderate (r = 0.68), while the highest correlation (r = 0.81) was between the BTM ODR and the group average individual milk samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A poor predictive ability for BTM ODR to assess individual ODR values in both FSG and cows was demonstrated. However, the study indicates that the evaluation by ELISA test on BTM to assess exposure to GIN could be useful in herds with a very high or low BTM ODR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-023-00712-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-023-00712-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃肠线虫(GIN) Ostertagia ostertagi可在第一季放牧牛(FSG)中引起严重疾病,并因亚临床感染而导致成年牛的生产性能受损。评估暴露的诊断方法包括粪卵计数和使用抗体elisa检测特异性抗体,从而产生光密度比(ODR)。利用酶联免疫吸附试验对散装罐乳(BTM)进行群体水平的诊断。需要适当使用诊断方法来评估ostertagi暴露,以优化畜群寄生虫监测并帮助建立可持续的控制制度。本研究的目的是描述用于评估挪威生产系统中GIN暴露的不同诊断测试之间的关系。2020年秋季,在挪威的20个牧群中进行了一项横断面实地研究。采集了380例个体的血清和粪便样本,其中FSG 181例,奶牛199例。此外,从每头奶牛中采集牛奶,并从每个牛群中采集1个BTM样本。进行粪卵计数。描述了种群内和种群间个体样本ODR值的分布,以及BTM ODR与个体ODR值之间的关系。采用散点图视觉评价、Pearson相关系数和线性回归对数据进行分析。结果:检测到每个牛群的血清和牛奶中个体ODR值的高度变异性。BTM的ODR解释了个体血清和牛奶样本的低程度差异。根据四种BTM分类绘制牛奶或血清的ODR结果时,最高和最低BTM分类的ODR值分布有显著差异。个体奶与血清样本的相关性为中等(r = 0.68),而BTM ODR与组平均个体奶样本的相关性最高(r = 0.81)。结论:BTM ODR对FSG和奶牛个体ODR值的预测能力较差。然而,该研究表明,通过酶联免疫吸附试验对猪BTM进行评估,以评估对GIN的暴露,可能对猪BTM ODR非常高或很低的猪群有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of diagnostic methods for assessment of Ostertagia ostertagi exposure in Norwegian dairy herds.

Background: The gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) Ostertagia ostertagi can cause severe disease in first season grazers (FSG) and impaired performance due to subclinical infections in adult cows. Diagnostic methods to assess exposure include faecal egg count and detection of specific antibodies using antibody-ELISAs resulting in an optical density ratio (ODR). Using the ELISA test on bulk tank milk (BTM) allows for a herd level diagnosis. Appropriate use of diagnostic methods for evaluation of O. ostertagi exposure is required to optimize herd parasite surveillance and aid in a sustainable control regime. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between different diagnostic tests used to assess GIN exposure in Norwegian production systems. A cross-sectional field study was carried out in twenty herds in Norway in the fall of 2020. Serum and faecal samples were taken from 380 individuals, of which 181 were FSG and 199 were cows. In addition, milk was collected from every cow and one BTM sample was taken from each herd. Faecal egg counts were performed. The distribution of ODR values in individual samples within and between herds and the associations between BTM ODR and individual ODR values were described. The data were analysed using visual assessment of scatter plots, Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression.

Results: A high variability of the within-herd individual ODR values in serum and milk in every herd was detected. The ODR in BTM explained a low degree of the variation in the individual serum and milk samples. When plotting the ODR results in milk or serum according to four BTM categories, the distribution of ODR values were notably different in the highest and lowest BTM categories. The correlation between individual milk and serum samples was moderate (r = 0.68), while the highest correlation (r = 0.81) was between the BTM ODR and the group average individual milk samples.

Conclusions: A poor predictive ability for BTM ODR to assess individual ODR values in both FSG and cows was demonstrated. However, the study indicates that the evaluation by ELISA test on BTM to assess exposure to GIN could be useful in herds with a very high or low BTM ODR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica is an open access journal encompassing all aspects of veterinary research and medicine of domestic and wild animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信