早期心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者左心室射血分数改善的预测因素。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Li-Ting Ho, Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang, Ying-Hsien Chen, Yih-Sharng Chen, Ron-Bin Hsu, Ching-Chang Huang, Chii-Ming Lee, Kuo-Liong Chien
{"title":"早期心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者左心室射血分数改善的预测因素。","authors":"Li-Ting Ho, Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang, Ying-Hsien Chen, Yih-Sharng Chen, Ron-Bin Hsu, Ching-Chang Huang, Chii-Ming Lee, Kuo-Liong Chien","doi":"10.6515/ACS.202311_39(6).20230412B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and compare the mortality rate between patients with HFrEF and heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in a post-acute care program from 2018 to 2021 were enrolled. A series of echocardiograms were arranged during follow-up. Mortality, cardiovascular death and sudden cardiac death events were recorded. A total of 259 patients were enrolled and followed for at least 1 year; 158 (61%) patients fulfilled the criteria of HFimpEF, 87 (33.6%) were defined as having persistent HFrEF, and 14 (5.4%) were defined as having heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction. The patients with HFimpEF and persistent HFrEF were included for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up duration was 1090 ± 414 days, and the median time to LVEF recovery was 159 days (IQR 112-289 days). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that beta-blocker prescription was the only independent predictor of HFimpEF [odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-4.08, p = 0.03]. Diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and QRS duration ≥ 110 ms were negative predictors of HFimpEF (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, p = 0.02, and OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.21-0.77, p = 0.005, respectively). The patients with HfimpEF had a significantly better prognosis with lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.08-0.50, log-rank p < 0.001) than the patients with persistent HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Beta-blocker prescription was an independent predictor of HFimpEF, while the diagnosis of ICM and QRS duration ≥ 110 ms were negative predictors of HFimpEF. Patients with HfimpEF had a significantly lower mortality rate compared to those with persistent HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":6957,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement in Patients with Early-Stage Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.\",\"authors\":\"Li-Ting Ho, Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang, Ying-Hsien Chen, Yih-Sharng Chen, Ron-Bin Hsu, Ching-Chang Huang, Chii-Ming Lee, Kuo-Liong Chien\",\"doi\":\"10.6515/ACS.202311_39(6).20230412B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and compare the mortality rate between patients with HFrEF and heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in a post-acute care program from 2018 to 2021 were enrolled. A series of echocardiograms were arranged during follow-up. Mortality, cardiovascular death and sudden cardiac death events were recorded. A total of 259 patients were enrolled and followed for at least 1 year; 158 (61%) patients fulfilled the criteria of HFimpEF, 87 (33.6%) were defined as having persistent HFrEF, and 14 (5.4%) were defined as having heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction. The patients with HFimpEF and persistent HFrEF were included for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up duration was 1090 ± 414 days, and the median time to LVEF recovery was 159 days (IQR 112-289 days). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that beta-blocker prescription was the only independent predictor of HFimpEF [odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-4.08, p = 0.03]. Diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and QRS duration ≥ 110 ms were negative predictors of HFimpEF (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, p = 0.02, and OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.21-0.77, p = 0.005, respectively). The patients with HfimpEF had a significantly better prognosis with lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.08-0.50, log-rank p < 0.001) than the patients with persistent HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Beta-blocker prescription was an independent predictor of HFimpEF, while the diagnosis of ICM and QRS duration ≥ 110 ms were negative predictors of HFimpEF. Patients with HfimpEF had a significantly lower mortality rate compared to those with persistent HFrEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202311_39(6).20230412B\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202311_39(6).20230412B","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者左室射血分数(LVEF)恢复的预测因素,并比较HFrEF患者和伴射血分数改善(HFimpEF)心力衰竭患者的死亡率。方法:纳入2018年至2021年急性后护理项目的患者。随访期间进行一系列超声心动图检查。记录死亡率、心血管死亡和心源性猝死事件。共有259名患者入组,随访至少1年;158例(61%)患者符合HFrEF标准,87例(33.6%)定义为持续性HFrEF, 14例(5.4%)定义为心力衰竭伴射血分数轻度降低。纳入HFimpEF和持续性HFrEF患者进行分析。结果:平均随访时间1090±414天,中位LVEF恢复时间159天(IQR 112 ~ 289天)。多因素logistic回归分析显示-受体阻滞剂处方是HFimpEF的唯一独立预测因子[比值比(OR) 2.11, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.10-4.08, p = 0.03]。诊断缺血性心肌病(ICM)和QRS持续时间≥110 ms是HFimpEF的负相关预测因子(OR分别为0.49,95% CI 0.27-0.88, p = 0.02, OR为0.4,95% CI 0.21-0.77, p = 0.005)。与持续性HFrEF患者相比,HfimpEF患者预后更好,死亡率更低(风险比0.2,95% CI 0.08-0.50, log-rank p < 0.001)。结论:β受体阻滞剂处方是HFimpEF的独立预测因子,而ICM诊断和QRS持续时间≥110 ms是HFimpEF的负相关预测因子。与持续性HFrEF患者相比,HfimpEF患者的死亡率显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement in Patients with Early-Stage Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Objectives: To identify the predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and compare the mortality rate between patients with HFrEF and heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF).

Methods: Patients in a post-acute care program from 2018 to 2021 were enrolled. A series of echocardiograms were arranged during follow-up. Mortality, cardiovascular death and sudden cardiac death events were recorded. A total of 259 patients were enrolled and followed for at least 1 year; 158 (61%) patients fulfilled the criteria of HFimpEF, 87 (33.6%) were defined as having persistent HFrEF, and 14 (5.4%) were defined as having heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction. The patients with HFimpEF and persistent HFrEF were included for analysis.

Results: The mean follow-up duration was 1090 ± 414 days, and the median time to LVEF recovery was 159 days (IQR 112-289 days). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that beta-blocker prescription was the only independent predictor of HFimpEF [odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-4.08, p = 0.03]. Diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and QRS duration ≥ 110 ms were negative predictors of HFimpEF (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, p = 0.02, and OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.21-0.77, p = 0.005, respectively). The patients with HfimpEF had a significantly better prognosis with lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.08-0.50, log-rank p < 0.001) than the patients with persistent HFrEF.

Conclusions: Beta-blocker prescription was an independent predictor of HFimpEF, while the diagnosis of ICM and QRS duration ≥ 110 ms were negative predictors of HFimpEF. Patients with HfimpEF had a significantly lower mortality rate compared to those with persistent HFrEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cardiologica Sinica
Acta Cardiologica Sinica 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Cardiologica Sinica welcomes all the papers in the fields related to cardiovascular medicine including basic research, vascular biology, clinical pharmacology, clinical trial, critical care medicine, coronary artery disease, interventional cardiology, arrythmia and electrophysiology, atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, valvular and structure cardiac disease, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and so on. We received papers from more than 20 countries and areas of the world. Currently, 40% of the papers were submitted to Acta Cardiologica Sinica from Taiwan, 20% from China, and 20% from the other countries and areas in the world. The acceptance rate for publication was around 50% in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信