线上和线下对新冠肺炎疫苗的看法:推文内容分析和大学生对疫苗看法的调查

Amanda D. Damiano, Wenjing Xie , Robert Fallen
{"title":"线上和线下对新冠肺炎疫苗的看法:推文内容分析和大学生对疫苗看法的调查","authors":"Amanda D. Damiano,&nbsp;Wenjing Xie ,&nbsp;Robert Fallen","doi":"10.1016/j.etdah.2023.100138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined social media conversations and people's attitudes and perceptions in the United States about the COVID-19 vaccine from January and February 2021. A total of 1,050 tweets were content analyzed (<em>N</em> = 1,050) (January 2021: <em>n</em> = 550, February 2021: <em>n</em> = 500). Research was also gathered from college students at a medium-sized college in the northeast during those two months using an online survey with a sample size of 171 (<em>N</em> = 171).</p><p>It was found that more tweets in January had negative sentiment than in February, whereas tweets in February had more positive sentiment than in January. Although half of the tweets did not address vaccine risk, the other half identified various risks. Tweets in January included more blaming of government and individuals than tweets in February. Regarding hazard and outrage, more tweets in January expressed low hazard and high outrage than tweets in February, though more tweets in February showed low hazard and low outrage than those in January. Finally, tweets in January contained more liberal and conservative frames than tweets in February.</p><p>The survey data show that people held positive attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine. Participants’ risk perception about the vaccine was low. They also rated the vaccine as highly effective. Participants noted COVID-19 being a high threat. People's concern with COVID-19 was moderately high. They also took highly active behavior to protect themselves from COVID-19. Participants showed relatively low levels of outrage toward COVID-19 vaccines. The majority of participants had family members and friends who received the vaccine. Survey participants with family members who had been infected with COVID-19 had more belief in the effectiveness of the vaccine than people whose family members had not been infected.</p><p>These findings can be invaluable to public health officials in better understanding perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine and risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72899,"journal":{"name":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118223000892/pdfft?md5=05b4c2b86ae4922a5281b17ea15a92cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2667118223000892-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 vaccine perceptions online and offline: A content analysis of tweets and a survey of college students’ opinions about the vaccine\",\"authors\":\"Amanda D. Damiano,&nbsp;Wenjing Xie ,&nbsp;Robert Fallen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etdah.2023.100138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examined social media conversations and people's attitudes and perceptions in the United States about the COVID-19 vaccine from January and February 2021. A total of 1,050 tweets were content analyzed (<em>N</em> = 1,050) (January 2021: <em>n</em> = 550, February 2021: <em>n</em> = 500). Research was also gathered from college students at a medium-sized college in the northeast during those two months using an online survey with a sample size of 171 (<em>N</em> = 171).</p><p>It was found that more tweets in January had negative sentiment than in February, whereas tweets in February had more positive sentiment than in January. Although half of the tweets did not address vaccine risk, the other half identified various risks. Tweets in January included more blaming of government and individuals than tweets in February. Regarding hazard and outrage, more tweets in January expressed low hazard and high outrage than tweets in February, though more tweets in February showed low hazard and low outrage than those in January. Finally, tweets in January contained more liberal and conservative frames than tweets in February.</p><p>The survey data show that people held positive attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine. Participants’ risk perception about the vaccine was low. They also rated the vaccine as highly effective. Participants noted COVID-19 being a high threat. People's concern with COVID-19 was moderately high. They also took highly active behavior to protect themselves from COVID-19. Participants showed relatively low levels of outrage toward COVID-19 vaccines. The majority of participants had family members and friends who received the vaccine. Survey participants with family members who had been infected with COVID-19 had more belief in the effectiveness of the vaccine than people whose family members had not been infected.</p><p>These findings can be invaluable to public health officials in better understanding perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine and risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118223000892/pdfft?md5=05b4c2b86ae4922a5281b17ea15a92cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2667118223000892-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118223000892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667118223000892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究调查了2021年1月至2月期间美国社交媒体上的对话以及人们对COVID-19疫苗的态度和看法。共有1050条推文进行了内容分析(N = 1050)(2021年1月:N = 550, 2021年2月:N = 500)。在这两个月里,我们还对东北一所中等规模大学的大学生进行了在线调查,样本量为171人(N = 171)。结果发现,1月份的推文中消极情绪多于2月份,而2月份的推文中积极情绪多于1月份。虽然一半的推文没有提到疫苗风险,但另一半则指出了各种风险。与2月份相比,1月份的推文中对政府和个人的指责更多。在危险和愤怒方面,1月份的推文中表达低危险和高愤怒的推文多于2月份的推文,尽管2月份的推文中表达低危险和低愤怒的推文多于1月份的推文。最后,1月份的推文包含了比2月份更多的自由和保守框架。调查数据显示,民众对新冠疫苗持积极态度。参与者对疫苗的风险认知较低。他们还认为这种疫苗非常有效。与会者指出,2019冠状病毒病是一个高度威胁。人们对COVID-19的担忧程度中等。他们还采取了高度积极的行为来保护自己免受COVID-19的侵害。参与者对COVID-19疫苗的愤怒程度相对较低。大多数参与者的家人和朋友都接种了疫苗。有家庭成员感染COVID-19的调查参与者比没有家庭成员感染的人更相信疫苗的有效性。这些发现对公共卫生官员更好地了解COVID-19疫苗和风险的看法具有宝贵价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 vaccine perceptions online and offline: A content analysis of tweets and a survey of college students’ opinions about the vaccine

This study examined social media conversations and people's attitudes and perceptions in the United States about the COVID-19 vaccine from January and February 2021. A total of 1,050 tweets were content analyzed (N = 1,050) (January 2021: n = 550, February 2021: n = 500). Research was also gathered from college students at a medium-sized college in the northeast during those two months using an online survey with a sample size of 171 (N = 171).

It was found that more tweets in January had negative sentiment than in February, whereas tweets in February had more positive sentiment than in January. Although half of the tweets did not address vaccine risk, the other half identified various risks. Tweets in January included more blaming of government and individuals than tweets in February. Regarding hazard and outrage, more tweets in January expressed low hazard and high outrage than tweets in February, though more tweets in February showed low hazard and low outrage than those in January. Finally, tweets in January contained more liberal and conservative frames than tweets in February.

The survey data show that people held positive attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine. Participants’ risk perception about the vaccine was low. They also rated the vaccine as highly effective. Participants noted COVID-19 being a high threat. People's concern with COVID-19 was moderately high. They also took highly active behavior to protect themselves from COVID-19. Participants showed relatively low levels of outrage toward COVID-19 vaccines. The majority of participants had family members and friends who received the vaccine. Survey participants with family members who had been infected with COVID-19 had more belief in the effectiveness of the vaccine than people whose family members had not been infected.

These findings can be invaluable to public health officials in better understanding perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine and risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health
Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Forensic Medicine, Drug Discovery, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (General)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信