认知,心理生理和知觉反应,以重复军事特定负荷推车跑步机模拟。

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1177/00187208231214216
Christopher A J Vine, Oliver R Runswick, Sam D Blacker, Sarah L Coakley, Andrew G Siddall, Stephen D Myers
{"title":"认知,心理生理和知觉反应,以重复军事特定负荷推车跑步机模拟。","authors":"Christopher A J Vine, Oliver R Runswick, Sam D Blacker, Sarah L Coakley, Andrew G Siddall, Stephen D Myers","doi":"10.1177/00187208231214216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dismounted military operations require soldiers to complete cognitive tasks whilst undertaking demanding and repeated physical taskings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effects of repeated fast load carriage bouts on cognitive performance, perceptual responses, and psychophysiological markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve civilian males (age, 28 ± 8 y; stature, 186 ± 6 cm; body mass 84.3 ± 11.1 kg; V̇O<sub>2max</sub>, 51.5 ± 6.4 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) completed three ∼65-min bouts of a Fast Load Carriage Protocol (FLCP), each interspersed with a 65-min recovery period, carrying a representative combat load of 25 kg. During each FLCP, cognitive function was assessed using a Shoot/Don't-Shoot Task (SDST) and a Military-Specific Auditory N-Back Task (MSANT), along with subjective ratings. Additional psychophysiological markers (heart rate variability, salivary cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate concentrations) were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A main effect of bout on MSANT combined score metric (<i>p</i> < .001, Kendall's W = 69.084) and for time on the accuracy-speed trade-off parameter of the SDST (<i>p</i> = .025, Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = .024) was evident. These likely changes in cognitive performance were coupled with subjective data indicating that participants perceived that they increased their mental effort to maintain cognitive performance (bout: <i>p</i> < .001, Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = .045; time: <i>p</i> < .001, Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = .232). Changes in HRV and salivary markers were also evident, likely tracking increased stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the increase in physiological and psychological stress, cognitive performance was largely maintained; purportedly a result of increased mental effort.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>Given the likely increase in dual-task interference in the field environment compared with the laboratory, military commanders should seek approaches to manage cognitive load where possible, to maintain soldier performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive, Psychophysiological, and Perceptual Responses to a Repeated Military-Specific Load Carriage Treadmill Simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher A J Vine, Oliver R Runswick, Sam D Blacker, Sarah L Coakley, Andrew G Siddall, Stephen D Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00187208231214216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dismounted military operations require soldiers to complete cognitive tasks whilst undertaking demanding and repeated physical taskings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effects of repeated fast load carriage bouts on cognitive performance, perceptual responses, and psychophysiological markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve civilian males (age, 28 ± 8 y; stature, 186 ± 6 cm; body mass 84.3 ± 11.1 kg; V̇O<sub>2max</sub>, 51.5 ± 6.4 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) completed three ∼65-min bouts of a Fast Load Carriage Protocol (FLCP), each interspersed with a 65-min recovery period, carrying a representative combat load of 25 kg. During each FLCP, cognitive function was assessed using a Shoot/Don't-Shoot Task (SDST) and a Military-Specific Auditory N-Back Task (MSANT), along with subjective ratings. Additional psychophysiological markers (heart rate variability, salivary cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate concentrations) were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A main effect of bout on MSANT combined score metric (<i>p</i> < .001, Kendall's W = 69.084) and for time on the accuracy-speed trade-off parameter of the SDST (<i>p</i> = .025, Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = .024) was evident. These likely changes in cognitive performance were coupled with subjective data indicating that participants perceived that they increased their mental effort to maintain cognitive performance (bout: <i>p</i> < .001, Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = .045; time: <i>p</i> < .001, Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = .232). Changes in HRV and salivary markers were also evident, likely tracking increased stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the increase in physiological and psychological stress, cognitive performance was largely maintained; purportedly a result of increased mental effort.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>Given the likely increase in dual-task interference in the field environment compared with the laboratory, military commanders should seek approaches to manage cognitive load where possible, to maintain soldier performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231214216\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231214216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下马军事行动要求士兵完成认知任务,同时承担高要求和重复的体力任务。目的:探讨反复快速负重训练对大鼠认知表现、知觉反应和心理生理指标的影响。方法:男性12名,年龄28±8岁;身高:186±6cm;体重84.3±11.1 kg;V * O2max, 51.5±6.4 mL·kg-1·min-1)完成了三次~ 65分钟的快速负荷运载方案(FLCP),每次穿插65分钟的恢复期,携带25kg的代表性战斗负荷。在每次FLCP期间,使用射击/不射击任务(SDST)和军事特定听觉N-Back任务(MSANT)以及主观评分来评估认知功能。其他心理生理指标(心率变异性、唾液皮质醇和硫酸脱氢表雄酮浓度)也被测量。结果:比赛对MSANT综合评分指标(p < 0.001, Kendall's W = 69.084)和时间对SDST准确度-速度权衡参数(p = 0.025, Ѡ2 = 0.024)的主要影响是明显的。这些认知表现的可能变化与主观数据相结合,表明参与者认为他们增加了精神努力来维持认知表现(约:p < .001, Ѡ2 = .045;时间:p < .001, Ѡ2 = .232)。HRV和唾液标志物的变化也很明显,可能与压力增加有关。结论:尽管生理和心理应激增加,但认知表现基本保持;据说是脑力劳动增加的结果。应用:与实验室相比,战场环境中的双重任务干扰可能会增加,军事指挥官应尽可能寻求管理认知负荷的方法,以保持士兵的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive, Psychophysiological, and Perceptual Responses to a Repeated Military-Specific Load Carriage Treadmill Simulation.

Background: Dismounted military operations require soldiers to complete cognitive tasks whilst undertaking demanding and repeated physical taskings.

Objective: To assess the effects of repeated fast load carriage bouts on cognitive performance, perceptual responses, and psychophysiological markers.

Methods: Twelve civilian males (age, 28 ± 8 y; stature, 186 ± 6 cm; body mass 84.3 ± 11.1 kg; V̇O2max, 51.5 ± 6.4 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed three ∼65-min bouts of a Fast Load Carriage Protocol (FLCP), each interspersed with a 65-min recovery period, carrying a representative combat load of 25 kg. During each FLCP, cognitive function was assessed using a Shoot/Don't-Shoot Task (SDST) and a Military-Specific Auditory N-Back Task (MSANT), along with subjective ratings. Additional psychophysiological markers (heart rate variability, salivary cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate concentrations) were also measured.

Results: A main effect of bout on MSANT combined score metric (p < .001, Kendall's W = 69.084) and for time on the accuracy-speed trade-off parameter of the SDST (p = .025, Ѡ2 = .024) was evident. These likely changes in cognitive performance were coupled with subjective data indicating that participants perceived that they increased their mental effort to maintain cognitive performance (bout: p < .001, Ѡ2 = .045; time: p < .001, Ѡ2 = .232). Changes in HRV and salivary markers were also evident, likely tracking increased stress.

Conclusion: Despite the increase in physiological and psychological stress, cognitive performance was largely maintained; purportedly a result of increased mental effort.

Application: Given the likely increase in dual-task interference in the field environment compared with the laboratory, military commanders should seek approaches to manage cognitive load where possible, to maintain soldier performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信