{"title":"台湾首次检出一种新型巴贝斯虫。","authors":"Pai-Shan Chiang, Yi-Wen Lai, Han-Hsuan Chung, Yung-Ting Chia, Chien-Cheng Wang, Hwa-Jen Teng, Shiu-Ling Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Newly recorded ticks and emerging tick-borne pathogens have recently been reported in subtropical and tropical East Asia. In this study, a total of 1,615 ticks (259 <em>Haemaphysalis hystricis</em>, 1334 <em>Rhipicephalus microplus</em>, 19 <em>H. flava</em>, and 3 <em>R. haemaphysaloides</em>) were collected by flagging from vegetation in Taiwan during 2019–2021. All 1,615 captured tick samples tested negative for SFTSV and <em>Borrelia</em>, but 12 of 356 tick samples tested positive for PCR amplification of a fragment of the 18S rRNA gene of <em>Babesia</em> spp., with an infection rate of 3.37 % (12/356) and a minimum infection rate of 0.74 % (12/1,615). Among the 12 detected <em>Babesia</em> spp., 11 were identified as <em>Babesia bigemina</em> in <em>R. microplus</em>, and the other one, detected in <em>H. hystricis</em>, was classified as an unnamed novel <em>Babesia</em> sp. Interestingly, the 18S rRNA sequence from the isolate detected in <em>H. hystricis</em> shared 98.79 % to 99.50 % identity with those of recent isolates from Japan, China and Nigeria. The exact origin of the <em>Babesia</em> species is not known, but the findings highlight the importance of international cooperation and the exchange of information on ticks and tick-borne pathogens. This represents a rare report of a <em>Babesia</em> sp. identified in <em>H. hystricis</em>, a tick species that has been proposed as a novel vector for some <em>Babesia</em> spp. This study supports <em>H. hystricis</em> as a possible vector of <em>Babesia</em> spp.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"15 1","pages":"Article 102284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001656/pdfft?md5=be329c489f2313612e305fb2af2856bb&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X23001656-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First molecular detection of a novel Babesia species from Haemaphysalis hystricis in Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Pai-Shan Chiang, Yi-Wen Lai, Han-Hsuan Chung, Yung-Ting Chia, Chien-Cheng Wang, Hwa-Jen Teng, Shiu-Ling Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Newly recorded ticks and emerging tick-borne pathogens have recently been reported in subtropical and tropical East Asia. In this study, a total of 1,615 ticks (259 <em>Haemaphysalis hystricis</em>, 1334 <em>Rhipicephalus microplus</em>, 19 <em>H. flava</em>, and 3 <em>R. haemaphysaloides</em>) were collected by flagging from vegetation in Taiwan during 2019–2021. All 1,615 captured tick samples tested negative for SFTSV and <em>Borrelia</em>, but 12 of 356 tick samples tested positive for PCR amplification of a fragment of the 18S rRNA gene of <em>Babesia</em> spp., with an infection rate of 3.37 % (12/356) and a minimum infection rate of 0.74 % (12/1,615). Among the 12 detected <em>Babesia</em> spp., 11 were identified as <em>Babesia bigemina</em> in <em>R. microplus</em>, and the other one, detected in <em>H. hystricis</em>, was classified as an unnamed novel <em>Babesia</em> sp. Interestingly, the 18S rRNA sequence from the isolate detected in <em>H. hystricis</em> shared 98.79 % to 99.50 % identity with those of recent isolates from Japan, China and Nigeria. The exact origin of the <em>Babesia</em> species is not known, but the findings highlight the importance of international cooperation and the exchange of information on ticks and tick-borne pathogens. This represents a rare report of a <em>Babesia</em> sp. identified in <em>H. hystricis</em>, a tick species that has been proposed as a novel vector for some <em>Babesia</em> spp. This study supports <em>H. hystricis</em> as a possible vector of <em>Babesia</em> spp.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 102284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001656/pdfft?md5=be329c489f2313612e305fb2af2856bb&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X23001656-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001656\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001656","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
First molecular detection of a novel Babesia species from Haemaphysalis hystricis in Taiwan
Newly recorded ticks and emerging tick-borne pathogens have recently been reported in subtropical and tropical East Asia. In this study, a total of 1,615 ticks (259 Haemaphysalis hystricis, 1334 Rhipicephalus microplus, 19 H. flava, and 3 R. haemaphysaloides) were collected by flagging from vegetation in Taiwan during 2019–2021. All 1,615 captured tick samples tested negative for SFTSV and Borrelia, but 12 of 356 tick samples tested positive for PCR amplification of a fragment of the 18S rRNA gene of Babesia spp., with an infection rate of 3.37 % (12/356) and a minimum infection rate of 0.74 % (12/1,615). Among the 12 detected Babesia spp., 11 were identified as Babesia bigemina in R. microplus, and the other one, detected in H. hystricis, was classified as an unnamed novel Babesia sp. Interestingly, the 18S rRNA sequence from the isolate detected in H. hystricis shared 98.79 % to 99.50 % identity with those of recent isolates from Japan, China and Nigeria. The exact origin of the Babesia species is not known, but the findings highlight the importance of international cooperation and the exchange of information on ticks and tick-borne pathogens. This represents a rare report of a Babesia sp. identified in H. hystricis, a tick species that has been proposed as a novel vector for some Babesia spp. This study supports H. hystricis as a possible vector of Babesia spp.
期刊介绍:
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials.
The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.