乙醇和电力:燃料还是愚弄公路客运的未来?

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Anderson Giehl , Natalia Klanovicz , Aline Frumi Camargo , Maria Luíza Rodrigues Albarello , Helen Treichel , Sérgio Luiz Alves Jr
{"title":"乙醇和电力:燃料还是愚弄公路客运的未来?","authors":"Anderson Giehl ,&nbsp;Natalia Klanovicz ,&nbsp;Aline Frumi Camargo ,&nbsp;Maria Luíza Rodrigues Albarello ,&nbsp;Helen Treichel ,&nbsp;Sérgio Luiz Alves Jr","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The vast majority of countries arguably agree that the planet is reaching a point of no return regarding global warming and climate change. Proof of that is the 2030 Agenda and the Paris Agreement, ratified by almost every nation worldwide. However, despite signing both great commitments, the states have made too little to meet the sustainability plans. Among the targets, renewable energy sources stand out to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, but still, petrol wells continue to be drilled, and vehicle assemblers keep investing in new technologies for running their cars with fossil fuels. At the same time, government policies seem to be betting all their chips on electric engines, as if electricity were the best substitute for oil. This critical review analyses the pros and cons of such alternative fuel for road passenger transport, also taking into account another potential substitute for gasoline: bioethanol. In the following pages, we address the challenges and avenues of both alternatives and demonstrate that diversification of the global energy matrix and the biomass feedstocks should be our guiding principles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100258"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000888/pdfft?md5=b75341dbb0127920aa4d1b365d859b96&pid=1-s2.0-S2772427123000888-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethanol and electricity: Fueling or fooling the future of road passenger transport?\",\"authors\":\"Anderson Giehl ,&nbsp;Natalia Klanovicz ,&nbsp;Aline Frumi Camargo ,&nbsp;Maria Luíza Rodrigues Albarello ,&nbsp;Helen Treichel ,&nbsp;Sérgio Luiz Alves Jr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The vast majority of countries arguably agree that the planet is reaching a point of no return regarding global warming and climate change. Proof of that is the 2030 Agenda and the Paris Agreement, ratified by almost every nation worldwide. However, despite signing both great commitments, the states have made too little to meet the sustainability plans. Among the targets, renewable energy sources stand out to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, but still, petrol wells continue to be drilled, and vehicle assemblers keep investing in new technologies for running their cars with fossil fuels. At the same time, government policies seem to be betting all their chips on electric engines, as if electricity were the best substitute for oil. This critical review analyses the pros and cons of such alternative fuel for road passenger transport, also taking into account another potential substitute for gasoline: bioethanol. In the following pages, we address the challenges and avenues of both alternatives and demonstrate that diversification of the global energy matrix and the biomass feedstocks should be our guiding principles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy nexus\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000888/pdfft?md5=b75341dbb0127920aa4d1b365d859b96&pid=1-s2.0-S2772427123000888-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy nexus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427123000888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绝大多数国家都认为,在全球变暖和气候变化问题上,地球已经到了不可逆转的地步。《2030年议程》和《巴黎协定》证明了这一点,它们几乎得到了全世界所有国家的批准。然而,尽管签署了这两项重大承诺,各州在实现可持续发展计划方面做得太少。在这些目标中,可再生能源在减少温室气体排放方面表现突出,但汽油井仍在继续钻探,汽车组装商仍在投资于使用化石燃料驱动汽车的新技术。与此同时,政府的政策似乎把所有筹码都押在了电动发动机上,似乎电力是石油的最佳替代品。这篇评论分析了这种公路客运替代燃料的利弊,同时也考虑到了汽油的另一种潜在替代品:生物乙醇。在接下来的几页中,我们将讨论这两种替代能源的挑战和途径,并证明全球能源矩阵和生物质原料的多样化应该是我们的指导原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ethanol and electricity: Fueling or fooling the future of road passenger transport?

Ethanol and electricity: Fueling or fooling the future of road passenger transport?

The vast majority of countries arguably agree that the planet is reaching a point of no return regarding global warming and climate change. Proof of that is the 2030 Agenda and the Paris Agreement, ratified by almost every nation worldwide. However, despite signing both great commitments, the states have made too little to meet the sustainability plans. Among the targets, renewable energy sources stand out to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, but still, petrol wells continue to be drilled, and vehicle assemblers keep investing in new technologies for running their cars with fossil fuels. At the same time, government policies seem to be betting all their chips on electric engines, as if electricity were the best substitute for oil. This critical review analyses the pros and cons of such alternative fuel for road passenger transport, also taking into account another potential substitute for gasoline: bioethanol. In the following pages, we address the challenges and avenues of both alternatives and demonstrate that diversification of the global energy matrix and the biomass feedstocks should be our guiding principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信