一个集成的工作流程协助在硅预测扩大优先多环芳香族化合物的名单。

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Tingyu Li, Wenyuan Su, Laijin Zhong, Wenqing Liang, Xiaoxia Feng, Bao Zhu, Ting Ruan* and Guibin Jiang, 
{"title":"一个集成的工作流程协助在硅预测扩大优先多环芳香族化合物的名单。","authors":"Tingyu Li,&nbsp;Wenyuan Su,&nbsp;Laijin Zhong,&nbsp;Wenqing Liang,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Feng,&nbsp;Bao Zhu,&nbsp;Ting Ruan* and Guibin Jiang,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.3c07087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The limited information in existing mass spectral libraries hinders an accurate understanding of the composition, behavior, and toxicity of organic pollutants. In this study, a total of 350 polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) in 9 categories were successfully identified in fine particulate matter by gas chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry. Using mass spectra and retention indexes predicted by in silico tools as complementary information, the scope of chemical identification was efficiently expanded by 27%. In addition, quantitative structure–activity relationship models provided toxicity data for over 70% of PACs, facilitating a comprehensive health risk assessment. On the basis of extensive identification, the cumulative noncarcinogenic risk of PACs warranted attention. Meanwhile, the carcinogenic risk of 53 individual analogues was noteworthy. These findings suggest that there is a pressing need for an updated list of priority PACs for routine monitoring and toxicological research since legacy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contributed modestly to the overall abundance (18%) and carcinogenic risk (8%). A toxicological priority index approach was applied for relative chemical ranking considering the environmental occurrence, fate, toxicity, and analytical availability. A list of 39 priority analogues was compiled, which predominantly consisted of high-molecular-weight PAHs and alkyl derivatives. These priority PACs further enhanced source interpretation, and the highest carcinogenic risk was attributed to coal combustion.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"57 49","pages":"20854–20863"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Integrated Workflow Assisted by In Silico Predictions To Expand the List of Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds\",\"authors\":\"Tingyu Li,&nbsp;Wenyuan Su,&nbsp;Laijin Zhong,&nbsp;Wenqing Liang,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Feng,&nbsp;Bao Zhu,&nbsp;Ting Ruan* and Guibin Jiang,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.3c07087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The limited information in existing mass spectral libraries hinders an accurate understanding of the composition, behavior, and toxicity of organic pollutants. In this study, a total of 350 polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) in 9 categories were successfully identified in fine particulate matter by gas chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry. Using mass spectra and retention indexes predicted by in silico tools as complementary information, the scope of chemical identification was efficiently expanded by 27%. In addition, quantitative structure–activity relationship models provided toxicity data for over 70% of PACs, facilitating a comprehensive health risk assessment. On the basis of extensive identification, the cumulative noncarcinogenic risk of PACs warranted attention. Meanwhile, the carcinogenic risk of 53 individual analogues was noteworthy. These findings suggest that there is a pressing need for an updated list of priority PACs for routine monitoring and toxicological research since legacy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contributed modestly to the overall abundance (18%) and carcinogenic risk (8%). A toxicological priority index approach was applied for relative chemical ranking considering the environmental occurrence, fate, toxicity, and analytical availability. A list of 39 priority analogues was compiled, which predominantly consisted of high-molecular-weight PAHs and alkyl derivatives. These priority PACs further enhanced source interpretation, and the highest carcinogenic risk was attributed to coal combustion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"57 49\",\"pages\":\"20854–20863\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c07087\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c07087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有质谱库中有限的信息阻碍了对有机污染物的组成、行为和毒性的准确理解。本研究利用气相色谱-高分辨质谱法成功鉴定了细颗粒物中9大类350种多环芳香族化合物。利用硅工具预测的质谱和保留指数作为补充信息,有效地将化学鉴定范围扩大了27%。此外,定量构效关系模型为70%以上的PACs提供了毒性数据,便于进行全面的健康风险评估。在广泛鉴定的基础上,PACs的累积非致癌性风险值得关注。同时,53种个体类似物的致癌风险值得注意。这些发现表明,迫切需要更新用于常规监测和毒理学研究的优先pac清单,因为遗留的多环芳烃(PAHs)对总体丰度(18%)和致癌风险(8%)的贡献较小。采用毒理学优先指数法,综合考虑环境发生、命运、毒性和分析有效性等因素,进行相对化学排序。编制了39个优先类似物的清单,其中以高分子量多环芳烃和烷基衍生物为主。这些优先pac进一步加强了来源解释,最高的致癌风险归因于煤炭燃烧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An Integrated Workflow Assisted by In Silico Predictions To Expand the List of Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds

An Integrated Workflow Assisted by In Silico Predictions To Expand the List of Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds

An Integrated Workflow Assisted by In Silico Predictions To Expand the List of Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds

The limited information in existing mass spectral libraries hinders an accurate understanding of the composition, behavior, and toxicity of organic pollutants. In this study, a total of 350 polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) in 9 categories were successfully identified in fine particulate matter by gas chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry. Using mass spectra and retention indexes predicted by in silico tools as complementary information, the scope of chemical identification was efficiently expanded by 27%. In addition, quantitative structure–activity relationship models provided toxicity data for over 70% of PACs, facilitating a comprehensive health risk assessment. On the basis of extensive identification, the cumulative noncarcinogenic risk of PACs warranted attention. Meanwhile, the carcinogenic risk of 53 individual analogues was noteworthy. These findings suggest that there is a pressing need for an updated list of priority PACs for routine monitoring and toxicological research since legacy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contributed modestly to the overall abundance (18%) and carcinogenic risk (8%). A toxicological priority index approach was applied for relative chemical ranking considering the environmental occurrence, fate, toxicity, and analytical availability. A list of 39 priority analogues was compiled, which predominantly consisted of high-molecular-weight PAHs and alkyl derivatives. These priority PACs further enhanced source interpretation, and the highest carcinogenic risk was attributed to coal combustion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信