欧亚大陆与恩克拉提亚:希腊-罗马融合理论与美德之争

IF 0.5 2区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Giouli Korobili
{"title":"欧亚大陆与恩克拉提亚:希腊-罗马融合理论与美德之争","authors":"Giouli Korobili","doi":"10.1163/15733823-20230076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of ancient philosophers showed a keen interest in understanding whether moral development and the acquisition of virtue is in any way affected by the material constitution of human bodies. Moral education and socialisation were conceived of as having a significant impact on the resulting behaviours, while individual natures, thanks to their special physiological characteristics, were frequently seen as constantly interacting with acquired traits, eventually determining individual characters. This paper focuses on two key concepts of this wider subject, <jats:italic>krasis</jats:italic> (blending) and <jats:italic>enkrateia</jats:italic> (continence), and attempts to trace their philosophical interrelations throughout Greek and Roman Antiquity, especially from the fifth century <jats:sc>BCE</jats:sc> to the first century <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc>. An important result of this analysis reveals that during this period, <jats:italic>enkrateia</jats:italic> is described – often explicitly – as a manifestation of <jats:italic>krasis</jats:italic>, signifying as it does a well-balanced blending of certain ‘ingredients’.","PeriodicalId":49081,"journal":{"name":"Early Science and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eukrasia and Enkrateia: Greco-Roman Theories of Blending and the Struggle for Virtue\",\"authors\":\"Giouli Korobili\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15733823-20230076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of ancient philosophers showed a keen interest in understanding whether moral development and the acquisition of virtue is in any way affected by the material constitution of human bodies. Moral education and socialisation were conceived of as having a significant impact on the resulting behaviours, while individual natures, thanks to their special physiological characteristics, were frequently seen as constantly interacting with acquired traits, eventually determining individual characters. This paper focuses on two key concepts of this wider subject, <jats:italic>krasis</jats:italic> (blending) and <jats:italic>enkrateia</jats:italic> (continence), and attempts to trace their philosophical interrelations throughout Greek and Roman Antiquity, especially from the fifth century <jats:sc>BCE</jats:sc> to the first century <jats:sc>CE</jats:sc>. An important result of this analysis reveals that during this period, <jats:italic>enkrateia</jats:italic> is described – often explicitly – as a manifestation of <jats:italic>krasis</jats:italic>, signifying as it does a well-balanced blending of certain ‘ingredients’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15733823-20230076\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15733823-20230076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多古代哲学家对道德的发展和美德的获得是否受到人体物质构成的影响表现出浓厚的兴趣。道德教育和社会化被认为对由此产生的行为有重大影响,而个人本性,由于其特殊的生理特征,经常被视为与后天特征不断相互作用,最终决定个人性格。本文主要关注这一更广泛主题的两个关键概念,krasis(混合)和enkrateia(自制),并试图追溯它们在古希腊和古罗马时期的哲学相互关系,特别是从公元前5世纪到公元1世纪。这一分析的一个重要结果表明,在这一时期,enkrateia被描述为krasis的一种表现,通常是明确的,意味着它是某些“成分”的平衡混合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eukrasia and Enkrateia: Greco-Roman Theories of Blending and the Struggle for Virtue
A number of ancient philosophers showed a keen interest in understanding whether moral development and the acquisition of virtue is in any way affected by the material constitution of human bodies. Moral education and socialisation were conceived of as having a significant impact on the resulting behaviours, while individual natures, thanks to their special physiological characteristics, were frequently seen as constantly interacting with acquired traits, eventually determining individual characters. This paper focuses on two key concepts of this wider subject, krasis (blending) and enkrateia (continence), and attempts to trace their philosophical interrelations throughout Greek and Roman Antiquity, especially from the fifth century BCE to the first century CE. An important result of this analysis reveals that during this period, enkrateia is described – often explicitly – as a manifestation of krasis, signifying as it does a well-balanced blending of certain ‘ingredients’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early Science and Medicine
Early Science and Medicine HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Science and Medicine (ESM) is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to the history of science, medicine and technology from the earliest times through to the end of the eighteenth century. The need to treat in a single journal all aspects of scientific activity and thought to the eighteenth century is due to two factors: to the continued importance of ancient sources throughout the Middle Ages and the early modern period, and to the comparably low degree of specialization and the high degree of disciplinary interdependence characterizing the period before the professionalization of science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信