用于中等通量抗生素检测和生物膜原位成像的微型滴度钉盖

IF 5.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Sarah K. Childs , A-Andrew D. Jones III
{"title":"用于中等通量抗生素检测和生物膜原位成像的微型滴度钉盖","authors":"Sarah K. Childs ,&nbsp;A-Andrew D. Jones III","doi":"10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bacteria biofilm responses to disinfectants and antibiotics are quantified and observed using multiple methods, though microscopy, particularly confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is preferred due to speed, a reduction in user error, and <em>in situ</em> analysis. CLSM can resolve biological and spatial heterogeneity of biofilms in 3D with limited throughput. The microplate peg-lid-based assay, described in ASTM E2799-22, is a medium-throughput method for testing biofilms but does not permit <em>in situ</em> imaging. Breaking off the peg, as recommended by the manufacturer, risks sample damage, and is limited to easily accessible pegs. Here we report modifications to the peg optimized for <em>in situ</em> visualization and visualization of all pegs. We report similar antibiotic challenge recovery via colony formation following the ASTM E2799-22 protocol and <em>in situ</em> imaging. We report novel quantifiable effects of antibiotics on biofilm morphologies, specifically biofilm streamers. The new design bridges the MBEC® assays design that selects for biofilm phenotypes with <em>in situ</em> imaging needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55844,"journal":{"name":"Biofilm","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100167"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207523000643/pdfft?md5=9f1e8da418a8c5c3c2eff2b251252f80&pid=1-s2.0-S2590207523000643-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A microtiter peg lid with ziggurat geometry for medium-throughput antibiotic testing and in situ imaging of biofilms\",\"authors\":\"Sarah K. Childs ,&nbsp;A-Andrew D. Jones III\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bacteria biofilm responses to disinfectants and antibiotics are quantified and observed using multiple methods, though microscopy, particularly confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is preferred due to speed, a reduction in user error, and <em>in situ</em> analysis. CLSM can resolve biological and spatial heterogeneity of biofilms in 3D with limited throughput. The microplate peg-lid-based assay, described in ASTM E2799-22, is a medium-throughput method for testing biofilms but does not permit <em>in situ</em> imaging. Breaking off the peg, as recommended by the manufacturer, risks sample damage, and is limited to easily accessible pegs. Here we report modifications to the peg optimized for <em>in situ</em> visualization and visualization of all pegs. We report similar antibiotic challenge recovery via colony formation following the ASTM E2799-22 protocol and <em>in situ</em> imaging. We report novel quantifiable effects of antibiotics on biofilm morphologies, specifically biofilm streamers. The new design bridges the MBEC® assays design that selects for biofilm phenotypes with <em>in situ</em> imaging needs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biofilm\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207523000643/pdfft?md5=9f1e8da418a8c5c3c2eff2b251252f80&pid=1-s2.0-S2590207523000643-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biofilm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207523000643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207523000643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细菌生物膜对消毒剂和抗生素的反应是用多种方法量化和观察的,尽管显微镜,特别是共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)是首选,因为速度快,减少了用户的错误,并且在原位分析。CLSM可以在有限的通量下三维解析生物膜的生物学和空间异质性。在ASTM E2799-22中描述的基于微孔板peg-盖的检测是一种中等通量的生物膜检测方法,但不允许原位成像。如制造商所建议的那样,折断木栓有损坏样品的风险,并且仅限于容易接近的木栓。在这里,我们报告了对peg的修改,优化了所有peg的原位可视化和可视化。我们根据ASTM E2799-22方案和原位成像,通过菌落形成报告类似的抗生素挑战恢复。我们报告了抗生素对生物膜形态的新的可量化影响,特别是生物膜流线。新设计连接了MBEC®分析设计,选择生物膜表型与原位成像需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A microtiter peg lid with ziggurat geometry for medium-throughput antibiotic testing and in situ imaging of biofilms

Bacteria biofilm responses to disinfectants and antibiotics are quantified and observed using multiple methods, though microscopy, particularly confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is preferred due to speed, a reduction in user error, and in situ analysis. CLSM can resolve biological and spatial heterogeneity of biofilms in 3D with limited throughput. The microplate peg-lid-based assay, described in ASTM E2799-22, is a medium-throughput method for testing biofilms but does not permit in situ imaging. Breaking off the peg, as recommended by the manufacturer, risks sample damage, and is limited to easily accessible pegs. Here we report modifications to the peg optimized for in situ visualization and visualization of all pegs. We report similar antibiotic challenge recovery via colony formation following the ASTM E2799-22 protocol and in situ imaging. We report novel quantifiable effects of antibiotics on biofilm morphologies, specifically biofilm streamers. The new design bridges the MBEC® assays design that selects for biofilm phenotypes with in situ imaging needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biofilm
Biofilm MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
1.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信