Jaeshik Chung , Bora Seo , Miyeon Lee , Jae Young Kim , Bogyeong Park
{"title":"报废光伏板资源回收过程的技术环境分析","authors":"Jaeshik Chung , Bora Seo , Miyeon Lee , Jae Young Kim , Bogyeong Park","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given the dramatic increase in end-of-life (EoL) photovoltaic (PV) panels, recycling of the EoL PV panels and recovery of valuable resources therein in a sustainable way became a major concern in the industry. In this regard, the feasibility of alternative leaching reagents that can replace the conventional HNO<sub>3</sub> was assessed, and resulting stoichiometries from the experiments were used to construct the inventory for the following life cycle assessment. Under optimized conditions, the efficiency of the alternative systems was comparable (ca. 90%) to the conventional system using HNO<sub>3</sub>, while the environmental impacts of which effectively reduced in most categories using the ReCiPe2016 midpoint method. In addition, uncertainties associated with the amount of chemicals and recovered materials were further considered from the Monte Carlo simulation. The resulting impact variances from using the different leaching agents showed meaningful statistical differences (p < 0.05), which corroborates the legitimacy of so-called ‘green leaching’.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107312"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923004469/pdfft?md5=6e858d6f23544bca7a784e0c550fd0a2&pid=1-s2.0-S0921344923004469-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-environmental analysis of resource recovery processes from end-of-life PV panels\",\"authors\":\"Jaeshik Chung , Bora Seo , Miyeon Lee , Jae Young Kim , Bogyeong Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Given the dramatic increase in end-of-life (EoL) photovoltaic (PV) panels, recycling of the EoL PV panels and recovery of valuable resources therein in a sustainable way became a major concern in the industry. In this regard, the feasibility of alternative leaching reagents that can replace the conventional HNO<sub>3</sub> was assessed, and resulting stoichiometries from the experiments were used to construct the inventory for the following life cycle assessment. Under optimized conditions, the efficiency of the alternative systems was comparable (ca. 90%) to the conventional system using HNO<sub>3</sub>, while the environmental impacts of which effectively reduced in most categories using the ReCiPe2016 midpoint method. In addition, uncertainties associated with the amount of chemicals and recovered materials were further considered from the Monte Carlo simulation. The resulting impact variances from using the different leaching agents showed meaningful statistical differences (p < 0.05), which corroborates the legitimacy of so-called ‘green leaching’.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923004469/pdfft?md5=6e858d6f23544bca7a784e0c550fd0a2&pid=1-s2.0-S0921344923004469-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923004469\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923004469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Techno-environmental analysis of resource recovery processes from end-of-life PV panels
Given the dramatic increase in end-of-life (EoL) photovoltaic (PV) panels, recycling of the EoL PV panels and recovery of valuable resources therein in a sustainable way became a major concern in the industry. In this regard, the feasibility of alternative leaching reagents that can replace the conventional HNO3 was assessed, and resulting stoichiometries from the experiments were used to construct the inventory for the following life cycle assessment. Under optimized conditions, the efficiency of the alternative systems was comparable (ca. 90%) to the conventional system using HNO3, while the environmental impacts of which effectively reduced in most categories using the ReCiPe2016 midpoint method. In addition, uncertainties associated with the amount of chemicals and recovered materials were further considered from the Monte Carlo simulation. The resulting impact variances from using the different leaching agents showed meaningful statistical differences (p < 0.05), which corroborates the legitimacy of so-called ‘green leaching’.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.