寻找治疗改变原则:我们做到了吗?

Marvin R. Goldfried
{"title":"寻找治疗改变原则:我们做到了吗?","authors":"Marvin R. Goldfried","doi":"10.1016/j.appsy.2009.10.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past 30 years, the topic of psychotherapy integration has moved from a latent theme to a clear movement, and the commentaries made in this issue of <em>Applied and Preventive Psychology</em> document these changes. More than ever before, the field of psychotherapy has become increasingly interested in achieving a consensus. The question is becoming <em>what</em>, not <em>who</em> is correct. We are now better able to identify stages of change that cut across different orientations, as well as underlying principles of change. Still, we are not “there yet,” and need to confront the limitations stemming from an overvaluation of what is “new,” and to develop a common language with which to communicate what we know. It is also suggested that a two-way bridge between research and practice can represent the future of psychotherapy integration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84177,"journal":{"name":"Applied & preventive psychology : journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 32-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.appsy.2009.10.013","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Searching for therapy change principles: Are we there yet?\",\"authors\":\"Marvin R. Goldfried\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appsy.2009.10.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Over the past 30 years, the topic of psychotherapy integration has moved from a latent theme to a clear movement, and the commentaries made in this issue of <em>Applied and Preventive Psychology</em> document these changes. More than ever before, the field of psychotherapy has become increasingly interested in achieving a consensus. The question is becoming <em>what</em>, not <em>who</em> is correct. We are now better able to identify stages of change that cut across different orientations, as well as underlying principles of change. Still, we are not “there yet,” and need to confront the limitations stemming from an overvaluation of what is “new,” and to develop a common language with which to communicate what we know. It is also suggested that a two-way bridge between research and practice can represent the future of psychotherapy integration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied & preventive psychology : journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 32-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.appsy.2009.10.013\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied & preventive psychology : journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962184909000146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied & preventive psychology : journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962184909000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

在过去的30年里,心理治疗整合的话题已经从一个潜在的主题变成了一个明确的运动,本期《应用与预防心理学》的评论记录了这些变化。心理治疗领域比以往任何时候都更有兴趣达成共识。问题是什么,而不是谁是正确的。我们现在能够更好地识别跨越不同方向的变化阶段,以及变化的基本原则。然而,我们还没有“到达那里”,需要面对由于对“新”事物的高估而产生的限制,并开发一种共同的语言来交流我们所知道的东西。研究和实践之间的双向桥梁可以代表心理治疗整合的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Searching for therapy change principles: Are we there yet?

Over the past 30 years, the topic of psychotherapy integration has moved from a latent theme to a clear movement, and the commentaries made in this issue of Applied and Preventive Psychology document these changes. More than ever before, the field of psychotherapy has become increasingly interested in achieving a consensus. The question is becoming what, not who is correct. We are now better able to identify stages of change that cut across different orientations, as well as underlying principles of change. Still, we are not “there yet,” and need to confront the limitations stemming from an overvaluation of what is “new,” and to develop a common language with which to communicate what we know. It is also suggested that a two-way bridge between research and practice can represent the future of psychotherapy integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信