Daniel Martínez-Barro, Joel Dair Rivera-Bello, Jannet Mercedes Cruz-López, Hermelinda Hernández-Amaro, David Rojano-Mejía
{"title":"[前驱疗法治疗关节病患者的股四头肌功能/等速功]。","authors":"Daniel Martínez-Barro, Joel Dair Rivera-Bello, Jannet Mercedes Cruz-López, Hermelinda Hernández-Amaro, David Rojano-Mejía","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10064325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolotherapy may be a good option in the complementary treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients, specifically for the increase of functionality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of prolotherapy in OA grade II - III in the functionality and muscular work of knee flexors and extensors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. It included patients diagnosed with OA grades II-III. The experimental group was infiltrated in both knees with 6 ml of 25% glucose solution and 0.05% lidocaine; control group with 0.45% saline solution and 0.05% lidocaine. All patients received a comprehensive rehabilitation program. The isokinetic work of the knee flexor and extensor muscles, pain and functionality were measured, prior to infiltration and at 3-month follow-up. To compare the difference in means, the Student's T test was applied, considering P<0.05 as significant. The project was approved by the local ethics and research committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 patients were recruited, 17 in the prolotherapy group. There were no intergroup differences in functionality, isokinetic knee flexor/extensor work, and pain at baseline, or during follow-up up to 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present study we identify that both prolotherapy and saline infiltration increased functionality, strength, and decreased pain; however, no statistically significant difference was found between the two group.</p>","PeriodicalId":94200,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Functionality/isokinetic work of quadriceps in patients with gonarthrosis managed with prolotherapy].\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Martínez-Barro, Joel Dair Rivera-Bello, Jannet Mercedes Cruz-López, Hermelinda Hernández-Amaro, David Rojano-Mejía\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.10064325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolotherapy may be a good option in the complementary treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients, specifically for the increase of functionality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of prolotherapy in OA grade II - III in the functionality and muscular work of knee flexors and extensors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. It included patients diagnosed with OA grades II-III. The experimental group was infiltrated in both knees with 6 ml of 25% glucose solution and 0.05% lidocaine; control group with 0.45% saline solution and 0.05% lidocaine. All patients received a comprehensive rehabilitation program. The isokinetic work of the knee flexor and extensor muscles, pain and functionality were measured, prior to infiltration and at 3-month follow-up. To compare the difference in means, the Student's T test was applied, considering P<0.05 as significant. The project was approved by the local ethics and research committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 patients were recruited, 17 in the prolotherapy group. There were no intergroup differences in functionality, isokinetic knee flexor/extensor work, and pain at baseline, or during follow-up up to 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present study we identify that both prolotherapy and saline infiltration increased functionality, strength, and decreased pain; however, no statistically significant difference was found between the two group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715815/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10064325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10064325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:前驱疗法可能是膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)患者补充治疗的一个很好的选择,特别是对于功能的增加。目的:探讨前驱治疗对II - III级骨关节炎患者膝关节屈伸肌功能和肌肉活动的影响。材料与方法:采用双盲随机对照临床试验。其中包括诊断为II-III级OA的患者。实验组患者双膝灌注25%葡萄糖溶液6 ml + 0.05%利多卡因;对照组给予0.45%生理盐水和0.05%利多卡因。所有患者均接受了全面的康复治疗。在浸润前和3个月的随访中,测量膝关节屈肌和伸肌的等速功、疼痛和功能。为了比较均值的差异,考虑到结果,应用学生T检验:招募了37例患者,前驱治疗组17例。在基线或长达12周的随访期间,各组间在功能、膝关节屈/伸肌等速工作和疼痛方面没有差异。结论:在目前的研究中,我们发现前驱治疗和生理盐水浸润都能增加功能、力量和减轻疼痛;但两组间无统计学差异。
[Functionality/isokinetic work of quadriceps in patients with gonarthrosis managed with prolotherapy].
Background: Prolotherapy may be a good option in the complementary treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients, specifically for the increase of functionality.
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of prolotherapy in OA grade II - III in the functionality and muscular work of knee flexors and extensors.
Material and methods: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. It included patients diagnosed with OA grades II-III. The experimental group was infiltrated in both knees with 6 ml of 25% glucose solution and 0.05% lidocaine; control group with 0.45% saline solution and 0.05% lidocaine. All patients received a comprehensive rehabilitation program. The isokinetic work of the knee flexor and extensor muscles, pain and functionality were measured, prior to infiltration and at 3-month follow-up. To compare the difference in means, the Student's T test was applied, considering P<0.05 as significant. The project was approved by the local ethics and research committee.
Results: 37 patients were recruited, 17 in the prolotherapy group. There were no intergroup differences in functionality, isokinetic knee flexor/extensor work, and pain at baseline, or during follow-up up to 12 weeks.
Conclusions: In the present study we identify that both prolotherapy and saline infiltration increased functionality, strength, and decreased pain; however, no statistically significant difference was found between the two group.