开发和验证急性心肌梗死患者的简单风险评分。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1159/000535370
Zheng-Yang Ge, Yang He, Ting-Bo Jiang, Jian-Ying Tao, Yong-Ming He
{"title":"开发和验证急性心肌梗死患者的简单风险评分。","authors":"Zheng-Yang Ge, Yang He, Ting-Bo Jiang, Jian-Ying Tao, Yong-Ming He","doi":"10.1159/000535370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains substantial. The current study is aimed at developing a novel simple risk score for AMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) extended validation trial (ChiCTR2000033730) and the CatLet validation trial (ChiCTR-POC-17013536), both being registered with <ext-link ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"http://chictr.org\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\">chictr.org</ext-link>, served as the derivation and validation datasets, respectively. Both datasets included 1,018 and 308 patients, respectively. They all suffered from AMI and underwent percutaneous intervention (PCI). The endpoint was 4-year all-cause death. Lasso regression analysis was used for covariate selection and coefficient estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 26 candidate predictor variables, the four strongest predictors for 4-year mortality were included in this novel risk score with an acronym of BACEF (serum alBumin, Age, serum Creatinine, and LVEF). This score was well calibrated and yielded an AUC (95% CI) statistics of 0.84 (0.80-0.87) in internal validation, 0.89 (0.83-0.95) in internal-external (temporal) validation, and 0.83 (0.77-0.89) in external validation. Notably, it outperformed the ACEF, ACEF II, GRACE scores with respect to 4-year mortality prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A simple risk score for 4-year mortality risk stratification was developed, extensively validated, and calibrated in patients with AMI. This novel BACEF score may be a useful risk stratification tool for patients with AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"95-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and Validating a Simple Risk Score for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Zheng-Yang Ge, Yang He, Ting-Bo Jiang, Jian-Ying Tao, Yong-Ming He\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000535370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains substantial. The current study is aimed at developing a novel simple risk score for AMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) extended validation trial (ChiCTR2000033730) and the CatLet validation trial (ChiCTR-POC-17013536), both being registered with <ext-link ext-link-type=\\\"uri\\\" xlink:href=\\\"http://chictr.org\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\">chictr.org</ext-link>, served as the derivation and validation datasets, respectively. Both datasets included 1,018 and 308 patients, respectively. They all suffered from AMI and underwent percutaneous intervention (PCI). The endpoint was 4-year all-cause death. Lasso regression analysis was used for covariate selection and coefficient estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 26 candidate predictor variables, the four strongest predictors for 4-year mortality were included in this novel risk score with an acronym of BACEF (serum alBumin, Age, serum Creatinine, and LVEF). This score was well calibrated and yielded an AUC (95% CI) statistics of 0.84 (0.80-0.87) in internal validation, 0.89 (0.83-0.95) in internal-external (temporal) validation, and 0.83 (0.77-0.89) in external validation. Notably, it outperformed the ACEF, ACEF II, GRACE scores with respect to 4-year mortality prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A simple risk score for 4-year mortality risk stratification was developed, extensively validated, and calibrated in patients with AMI. This novel BACEF score may be a useful risk stratification tool for patients with AMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"95-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535370\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性心肌梗死(AMI)的死亡率仍然很高。目前的研究旨在开发一种新颖简单的AMI风险评分方法。方法:冠状动脉树描述和病变评估(CatLet)扩展验证试验(ChiCTR2000033730)和CatLet验证试验(ChiCTR-POC-17013536)分别作为推导和验证数据集,均在chictr.org上注册。两个数据集分别包括1018例和308例患者。所有患者均患有急性心肌梗死,均行经皮介入治疗(PCI)。终点是4年全因死亡。采用套索回归分析进行协变量选择和系数估计。结果:在26个候选预测变量中,4个最强的4年死亡率预测变量被包括在这个由BACEF(血清白蛋白、年龄、血清肌酐和LVEF)首字母缩写组成的新型风险评分中。该评分经过了很好的校准,内部验证的AUC (95%CI)统计量为0.84(0.80-0.87),内外(时间)验证的AUC (95%CI)统计量为0.89(0.83-0.95),外部验证的AUC (95%CI)统计量为0.83(0.77-0.89)。值得注意的是,它在4年死亡率预测方面优于ACEF, ACEFII, GRACE评分。结论:在AMI患者中开发了一个简单的4年死亡风险分层风险评分,并进行了广泛的验证和校准。这种新颖的BACEF评分可能是AMI患者的一种有用的风险分层工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing and Validating a Simple Risk Score for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Introduction: Mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains substantial. The current study is aimed at developing a novel simple risk score for AMI.

Methods: The Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) extended validation trial (ChiCTR2000033730) and the CatLet validation trial (ChiCTR-POC-17013536), both being registered with chictr.org, served as the derivation and validation datasets, respectively. Both datasets included 1,018 and 308 patients, respectively. They all suffered from AMI and underwent percutaneous intervention (PCI). The endpoint was 4-year all-cause death. Lasso regression analysis was used for covariate selection and coefficient estimation.

Results: Of 26 candidate predictor variables, the four strongest predictors for 4-year mortality were included in this novel risk score with an acronym of BACEF (serum alBumin, Age, serum Creatinine, and LVEF). This score was well calibrated and yielded an AUC (95% CI) statistics of 0.84 (0.80-0.87) in internal validation, 0.89 (0.83-0.95) in internal-external (temporal) validation, and 0.83 (0.77-0.89) in external validation. Notably, it outperformed the ACEF, ACEF II, GRACE scores with respect to 4-year mortality prediction.

Conclusion: A simple risk score for 4-year mortality risk stratification was developed, extensively validated, and calibrated in patients with AMI. This novel BACEF score may be a useful risk stratification tool for patients with AMI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信