Bruno Arruda Mascaro, Jean-Pierre Salomon, Marina Santos Demartine, Tassiane Caroline Nicola, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis
{"title":"不同牙膏和热循环对染色和釉面单片硅酸锂和氧化锆刷牙后颜色和透明度的评价。","authors":"Bruno Arruda Mascaro, Jean-Pierre Salomon, Marina Santos Demartine, Tassiane Caroline Nicola, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate changes in color and translucency of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia after toothbrushing with conventional or whitening dentifrices followed by thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Samples (n = 20/material) from CAD/CAM (IPS e.max CAD [EC]) and pressable (IPS e.max Press [EP]) lithium disilicates and 5Y-PSZ zirconia (Prettau 4 Anterior [PA]) were prepared and received staining and glazing procedures. Aging was performed by toothbrushing with conventional (n = 10) or whitening (n = 10) dentifrices, followed by thermocycling simulating 5, 10, and 15 years. Color coordinates L*, a*, b*, , and C* and h° values were assessed with a spectrophotometer at baseline and after each aging period to calculate color changes (ΔE00), lightness (ΔL*), and translucency parameter (TP). Data were analyzed using three-way repeated measures ANOVA's followed by Sidak post-hoc test (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing the dentifrices, EC and EP produced the greatest ΔE00 after 15 years with the whitening dentifrice (P < .05). Regardless of the dentifrice, PA showed greater ΔE00 than EC after 10 years (P < .05). When comparing the aging periods, EC and PA did not show differences in ΔE00 for both dentifrices (P ≥ .05). EC and EP produced an increased ΔL* after 15 years in the whitening group (P < .05). In the whitening groups, the ΔL* values of PA differ (P < .005) from those of lithium disilicates. Regardless of the experimental group, the TP values followed the inequality: PA < EC < EP (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the color of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia changed under aging with greater effects for whitening dentifrice. Aging did not influence translucency.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"423-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Color and Translucency of Stained and Glazed Monolithic Lithium Disilicates and Zirconia After Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices and Thermocycling.\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Arruda Mascaro, Jean-Pierre Salomon, Marina Santos Demartine, Tassiane Caroline Nicola, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate changes in color and translucency of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia after toothbrushing with conventional or whitening dentifrices followed by thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Samples (n = 20/material) from CAD/CAM (IPS e.max CAD [EC]) and pressable (IPS e.max Press [EP]) lithium disilicates and 5Y-PSZ zirconia (Prettau 4 Anterior [PA]) were prepared and received staining and glazing procedures. Aging was performed by toothbrushing with conventional (n = 10) or whitening (n = 10) dentifrices, followed by thermocycling simulating 5, 10, and 15 years. Color coordinates L*, a*, b*, , and C* and h° values were assessed with a spectrophotometer at baseline and after each aging period to calculate color changes (ΔE00), lightness (ΔL*), and translucency parameter (TP). Data were analyzed using three-way repeated measures ANOVA's followed by Sidak post-hoc test (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing the dentifrices, EC and EP produced the greatest ΔE00 after 15 years with the whitening dentifrice (P < .05). Regardless of the dentifrice, PA showed greater ΔE00 than EC after 10 years (P < .05). When comparing the aging periods, EC and PA did not show differences in ΔE00 for both dentifrices (P ≥ .05). EC and EP produced an increased ΔL* after 15 years in the whitening group (P < .05). In the whitening groups, the ΔL* values of PA differ (P < .005) from those of lithium disilicates. Regardless of the experimental group, the TP values followed the inequality: PA < EC < EP (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the color of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia changed under aging with greater effects for whitening dentifrice. Aging did not influence translucency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"423-431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Color and Translucency of Stained and Glazed Monolithic Lithium Disilicates and Zirconia After Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices and Thermocycling.
Purpose: To evaluate changes in color and translucency of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia after toothbrushing with conventional or whitening dentifrices followed by thermocycling.
Materials and methods: Samples (n = 20/material) from CAD/CAM (IPS e.max CAD [EC]) and pressable (IPS e.max Press [EP]) lithium disilicates and 5Y-PSZ zirconia (Prettau 4 Anterior [PA]) were prepared and received staining and glazing procedures. Aging was performed by toothbrushing with conventional (n = 10) or whitening (n = 10) dentifrices, followed by thermocycling simulating 5, 10, and 15 years. Color coordinates L*, a*, b*, , and C* and h° values were assessed with a spectrophotometer at baseline and after each aging period to calculate color changes (ΔE00), lightness (ΔL*), and translucency parameter (TP). Data were analyzed using three-way repeated measures ANOVA's followed by Sidak post-hoc test (α = .05).
Results: When comparing the dentifrices, EC and EP produced the greatest ΔE00 after 15 years with the whitening dentifrice (P < .05). Regardless of the dentifrice, PA showed greater ΔE00 than EC after 10 years (P < .05). When comparing the aging periods, EC and PA did not show differences in ΔE00 for both dentifrices (P ≥ .05). EC and EP produced an increased ΔL* after 15 years in the whitening group (P < .05). In the whitening groups, the ΔL* values of PA differ (P < .005) from those of lithium disilicates. Regardless of the experimental group, the TP values followed the inequality: PA < EC < EP (P < .05).
Conclusions: Overall, the color of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia changed under aging with greater effects for whitening dentifrice. Aging did not influence translucency.