距离是美国南部农村性少数群体和性别少数群体艾滋病毒检测的障碍:一项横断面研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-21 DOI:10.22605/RRH8227
Alyssa Clausen, Rob B Stephenson, Patrick S Sullivan, O Winslow Edwards, Leland Merrill, Cristian Acero Martinez, Jeb Jones
{"title":"距离是美国南部农村性少数群体和性别少数群体艾滋病毒检测的障碍:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Alyssa Clausen, Rob B Stephenson, Patrick S Sullivan, O Winslow Edwards, Leland Merrill, Cristian Acero Martinez, Jeb Jones","doi":"10.22605/RRH8227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sexual and gender minority people who live in rural areas are less likely to have had a HIV test in the previous 12 months compared with those who live in non-rural areas. We assessed the independent contribution of distance and time required to travel to receive a HIV test on recent uptake of HIV testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of sexual and gender minority populations in the southern US. We used Poisson regression with robust standard errors to estimate prevalence ratios to compare uptake of HIV testing in the previous 12 months among those who traveled more than 20 miles (~32 km) and more than 30 minutes to their most recent HIV test compared with those who traveled less distance and time to their most recent test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 508 (n=155 rural, n=348 non-rural) participants completed the survey. Of these, 398 (78.5%) had received a HIV test in the previous 12 months. Those who traveled more than 20 miles (~32 km) to their most recent test were more likely to have not received a HIV test in the previous 12 months compared with those who traveled 20 miles (~32 km) or less (adjusted prevalence ratio 2.25; 95% confidence interval 1.22-4.17). There were no differences based on travel time to the most recent test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distance, but not time, to travel to receive a HIV test is independently associated with reduced HIV testing. More geographically proximal options or access to home-based testing might reduce this barrier.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"23 4","pages":"8227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distance as a barrier to HIV testing among sexual and gender minority populations in the rural southern US: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa Clausen, Rob B Stephenson, Patrick S Sullivan, O Winslow Edwards, Leland Merrill, Cristian Acero Martinez, Jeb Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.22605/RRH8227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sexual and gender minority people who live in rural areas are less likely to have had a HIV test in the previous 12 months compared with those who live in non-rural areas. We assessed the independent contribution of distance and time required to travel to receive a HIV test on recent uptake of HIV testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of sexual and gender minority populations in the southern US. We used Poisson regression with robust standard errors to estimate prevalence ratios to compare uptake of HIV testing in the previous 12 months among those who traveled more than 20 miles (~32 km) and more than 30 minutes to their most recent HIV test compared with those who traveled less distance and time to their most recent test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 508 (n=155 rural, n=348 non-rural) participants completed the survey. Of these, 398 (78.5%) had received a HIV test in the previous 12 months. Those who traveled more than 20 miles (~32 km) to their most recent test were more likely to have not received a HIV test in the previous 12 months compared with those who traveled 20 miles (~32 km) or less (adjusted prevalence ratio 2.25; 95% confidence interval 1.22-4.17). There were no differences based on travel time to the most recent test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distance, but not time, to travel to receive a HIV test is independently associated with reduced HIV testing. More geographically proximal options or access to home-based testing might reduce this barrier.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"8227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8227\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与生活在非农村地区的人相比,生活在农村地区的性和性别少数群体在过去12个月内接受艾滋病毒检测的可能性较小。我们评估了接受艾滋病毒检测所需的旅行距离和时间对最近接受艾滋病毒检测的独立贡献。方法:我们对美国南部的性和性别少数人群进行了横断面调查。我们使用具有稳健标准误差的泊松回归来估计流行率,以比较在过去12个月里,距离最近一次HIV检测超过20英里(~32公里)和30分钟以上的人与距离和时间较短的人进行HIV检测的情况。结果:共有508人(农村155人,非农村348人)完成调查。其中,398人(78.5%)在过去12个月内接受过艾滋病毒检测。那些旅行超过20英里(~32公里)进行最近一次检测的人与那些旅行20英里(~32公里)或更少的人相比,在过去的12个月内更有可能没有接受过艾滋病毒检测(调整患病率为2.25;95%置信区间1.22-4.17)。到最近一次测试的旅行时间没有差异。结论:旅行接受HIV检测的距离而不是时间与HIV检测的减少独立相关。地理位置更近的选择或获得家庭检测可能会减少这一障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distance as a barrier to HIV testing among sexual and gender minority populations in the rural southern US: a cross-sectional study.

Introduction: Sexual and gender minority people who live in rural areas are less likely to have had a HIV test in the previous 12 months compared with those who live in non-rural areas. We assessed the independent contribution of distance and time required to travel to receive a HIV test on recent uptake of HIV testing.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of sexual and gender minority populations in the southern US. We used Poisson regression with robust standard errors to estimate prevalence ratios to compare uptake of HIV testing in the previous 12 months among those who traveled more than 20 miles (~32 km) and more than 30 minutes to their most recent HIV test compared with those who traveled less distance and time to their most recent test, respectively.

Results: A total of 508 (n=155 rural, n=348 non-rural) participants completed the survey. Of these, 398 (78.5%) had received a HIV test in the previous 12 months. Those who traveled more than 20 miles (~32 km) to their most recent test were more likely to have not received a HIV test in the previous 12 months compared with those who traveled 20 miles (~32 km) or less (adjusted prevalence ratio 2.25; 95% confidence interval 1.22-4.17). There were no differences based on travel time to the most recent test.

Conclusion: Distance, but not time, to travel to receive a HIV test is independently associated with reduced HIV testing. More geographically proximal options or access to home-based testing might reduce this barrier.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信