解决水、能源和食物关系中的权衡问题

J. Pittock , S. Orr , L. Stevens , M. Aheeyar , M. Smith
{"title":"解决水、能源和食物关系中的权衡问题","authors":"J. Pittock ,&nbsp;S. Orr ,&nbsp;L. Stevens ,&nbsp;M. Aheeyar ,&nbsp;M. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We explore processes that enable effective policies and practices for managing the links between water, energy, and food. Three case studies are assessed at different scales in the Mekong River basin, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. We find that there are considerable opportunities for improving outcomes for sustainable development by finding solutions that accommodate multiple objectives in the nexus. These include making data more publicly available, commissioning independent experts to advise on contested issues, engaging under-represented stakeholders in decision-making, sharing benefits, exploring different perspectives in forums where alternative development options can be tested and engaging decision-makers at different scales.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92478,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic procedia","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 58-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.10.008","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tackling Trade-offs in the Nexus of Water, Energy and Food\",\"authors\":\"J. Pittock ,&nbsp;S. Orr ,&nbsp;L. Stevens ,&nbsp;M. Aheeyar ,&nbsp;M. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.10.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We explore processes that enable effective policies and practices for managing the links between water, energy, and food. Three case studies are assessed at different scales in the Mekong River basin, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. We find that there are considerable opportunities for improving outcomes for sustainable development by finding solutions that accommodate multiple objectives in the nexus. These include making data more publicly available, commissioning independent experts to advise on contested issues, engaging under-represented stakeholders in decision-making, sharing benefits, exploring different perspectives in forums where alternative development options can be tested and engaging decision-makers at different scales.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquatic procedia\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 58-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.10.008\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquatic procedia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214241X15002862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic procedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214241X15002862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

我们探索的过程,使有效的政策和实践管理水,能源和食品之间的联系。在湄公河流域、斯里兰卡和津巴布韦进行了三个不同规模的案例研究。我们发现,通过寻找兼顾多重目标的解决方案,有相当大的机会改善可持续发展的成果。这些措施包括使数据更加公开,委托独立专家就有争议的问题提供咨询意见,让代表性不足的利益攸关方参与决策,分享利益,在可以测试替代发展方案的论坛上探索不同的观点,以及让不同规模的决策者参与进来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tackling Trade-offs in the Nexus of Water, Energy and Food

We explore processes that enable effective policies and practices for managing the links between water, energy, and food. Three case studies are assessed at different scales in the Mekong River basin, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. We find that there are considerable opportunities for improving outcomes for sustainable development by finding solutions that accommodate multiple objectives in the nexus. These include making data more publicly available, commissioning independent experts to advise on contested issues, engaging under-represented stakeholders in decision-making, sharing benefits, exploring different perspectives in forums where alternative development options can be tested and engaging decision-makers at different scales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信