描述美国俄亥俄州畜牧生产者与蜱虫及相关疾病的经验。

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Andreas Eleftheriou, Samantha Swisher, Andréia Arruda, Amanda Berrian, Risa Pesapane
{"title":"描述美国俄亥俄州畜牧生产者与蜱虫及相关疾病的经验。","authors":"Andreas Eleftheriou, Samantha Swisher, Andréia Arruda, Amanda Berrian, Risa Pesapane","doi":"10.1186/s42522-023-00091-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As tick ranges expand across North America, the risk of tick bites and tick-borne diseases (TBDs, i.e. diseases or syndromes associated with ticks) rises for humans and animals, making prevention critical. Several U.S. studies have examined knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ticks and TBDs for various cohorts of people. However, among occupational groups with high exposure risk from ticks and TBDs are livestock producers, of which we know little about. To help address this gap, an electronic questionnaire was distributed to livestock producers in Ohio, U.S, a state with a robust agricultural sector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We generated descriptive statistics and conducted a multiple correspondence analysis followed by hierarchical clustering on principal components to identify producers with similar response profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 57 producers showed that most (52.6%) think the American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis) is found in Ohio but are unsure about other species. Although several TBDs are present in Ohio, most (> 50%) producers were unsure or unaware of their presence. Interestingly, most (54.4%) thought ticks pose major health risks for their livestock but fewer (49.1%) thought the same for humans. Regardless, most producers did employ at least one prevention method for themselves (96.5%) and their animals (82.5%). Cluster analysis (n = 48) identified three groups: the largest (n = 21) was considered \"aware and cautious\" consisting primarily of farm owners. The others generally practiced less prevention and consisted primarily of farm employees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that producers in Ohio practice prevention for themselves and their livestock, but demonstrate gaps in knowledge (e.g., TBD occurrence) and attitudes (e.g., health risks) that could be addressed via educational formats we found producers preferred (e.g., extension materials), to encourage informed prevention. This is especially important for farm employees that may practice less prevention because of lower awareness. Our study can guide others in regions faced with similar tick and TBD risks to protect occupational and livestock health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":"5 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Describing the experience of livestock producers from Ohio, USA with ticks and associated diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Eleftheriou, Samantha Swisher, Andréia Arruda, Amanda Berrian, Risa Pesapane\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42522-023-00091-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As tick ranges expand across North America, the risk of tick bites and tick-borne diseases (TBDs, i.e. diseases or syndromes associated with ticks) rises for humans and animals, making prevention critical. Several U.S. studies have examined knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ticks and TBDs for various cohorts of people. However, among occupational groups with high exposure risk from ticks and TBDs are livestock producers, of which we know little about. To help address this gap, an electronic questionnaire was distributed to livestock producers in Ohio, U.S, a state with a robust agricultural sector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We generated descriptive statistics and conducted a multiple correspondence analysis followed by hierarchical clustering on principal components to identify producers with similar response profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 57 producers showed that most (52.6%) think the American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis) is found in Ohio but are unsure about other species. Although several TBDs are present in Ohio, most (> 50%) producers were unsure or unaware of their presence. Interestingly, most (54.4%) thought ticks pose major health risks for their livestock but fewer (49.1%) thought the same for humans. Regardless, most producers did employ at least one prevention method for themselves (96.5%) and their animals (82.5%). Cluster analysis (n = 48) identified three groups: the largest (n = 21) was considered \\\"aware and cautious\\\" consisting primarily of farm owners. The others generally practiced less prevention and consisted primarily of farm employees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that producers in Ohio practice prevention for themselves and their livestock, but demonstrate gaps in knowledge (e.g., TBD occurrence) and attitudes (e.g., health risks) that could be addressed via educational formats we found producers preferred (e.g., extension materials), to encourage informed prevention. This is especially important for farm employees that may practice less prevention because of lower awareness. Our study can guide others in regions faced with similar tick and TBD risks to protect occupational and livestock health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One health outlook\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One health outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-023-00091-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One health outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-023-00091-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着蜱在北美范围的扩大,人类和动物被蜱叮咬和蜱传疾病(即与蜱有关的疾病或综合征)的风险上升,因此预防至关重要。美国的几项研究调查了不同人群关于蜱虫和tbd的知识、态度和实践。然而,在蜱虫和tbd高暴露风险的职业群体中,我们对畜牧业生产者知之甚少。为了帮助解决这一差距,向农业部门强劲的美国俄亥俄州的牲畜生产者分发了一份电子问卷。方法:采用描述性统计方法,进行多重对应分析,然后对主成分进行分层聚类,以识别具有相似响应概况的生产者。结果:57家生产商的回复显示,大多数(52.6%)认为美国狗蜱(可变皮肤蜱)在俄亥俄州发现,但不确定其他物种。尽管俄亥俄州有几个油压井,但大多数(50%)的生产商不确定或不知道它们的存在。有趣的是,大多数人(54.4%)认为蜱虫对他们的牲畜构成重大健康风险,但较少的人(49.1%)认为蜱虫对人类也有同样的风险。无论如何,大多数生产者确实为自己(96.5%)和牲畜(82.5%)采取了至少一种预防方法。聚类分析(n = 48)确定了三个群体:最大的(n = 21)被认为是“有意识和谨慎的”,主要由农场主组成。其他群体通常较少采取预防措施,主要由农场雇员组成。结论:我们的研究结果表明,俄亥俄州的生产者为自己和他们的牲畜采取预防措施,但在知识(如TBD发生)和态度(如健康风险)方面存在差距,这些差距可以通过教育形式解决。我们发现生产者首选(如推广材料),以鼓励知情预防。这对农场员工尤其重要,因为他们的意识较低,可能很少采取预防措施。我们的研究可以指导面临类似蜱虫和TBD风险地区的其他人保护职业和牲畜健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Describing the experience of livestock producers from Ohio, USA with ticks and associated diseases.

Background: As tick ranges expand across North America, the risk of tick bites and tick-borne diseases (TBDs, i.e. diseases or syndromes associated with ticks) rises for humans and animals, making prevention critical. Several U.S. studies have examined knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ticks and TBDs for various cohorts of people. However, among occupational groups with high exposure risk from ticks and TBDs are livestock producers, of which we know little about. To help address this gap, an electronic questionnaire was distributed to livestock producers in Ohio, U.S, a state with a robust agricultural sector.

Methods: We generated descriptive statistics and conducted a multiple correspondence analysis followed by hierarchical clustering on principal components to identify producers with similar response profiles.

Results: Responses from 57 producers showed that most (52.6%) think the American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis) is found in Ohio but are unsure about other species. Although several TBDs are present in Ohio, most (> 50%) producers were unsure or unaware of their presence. Interestingly, most (54.4%) thought ticks pose major health risks for their livestock but fewer (49.1%) thought the same for humans. Regardless, most producers did employ at least one prevention method for themselves (96.5%) and their animals (82.5%). Cluster analysis (n = 48) identified three groups: the largest (n = 21) was considered "aware and cautious" consisting primarily of farm owners. The others generally practiced less prevention and consisted primarily of farm employees.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that producers in Ohio practice prevention for themselves and their livestock, but demonstrate gaps in knowledge (e.g., TBD occurrence) and attitudes (e.g., health risks) that could be addressed via educational formats we found producers preferred (e.g., extension materials), to encourage informed prevention. This is especially important for farm employees that may practice less prevention because of lower awareness. Our study can guide others in regions faced with similar tick and TBD risks to protect occupational and livestock health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信