跑步者、运动者和不运动者腹部肌肉厚度、力量和耐力的差异。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Beth H Schaeffer, Wendy K Anemaet, Allison L Arnold, Autumn B Brabham, Nancy K Groom, Cassidee R Moore
{"title":"跑步者、运动者和不运动者腹部肌肉厚度、力量和耐力的差异。","authors":"Beth H Schaeffer, Wendy K Anemaet, Allison L Arnold, Autumn B Brabham, Nancy K Groom, Cassidee R Moore","doi":"10.1177/19417381231212471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Core musculature is important for efficiency during activities including running. Both abdominal muscle strength and endurance contribute to this efficiency. The purpose of this study is to determine what differences and relationships exist in abdominal muscle thickness, strength, and endurance among persons who are runners, active, and inactive.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Persons in the running group would show significantly greater abdominal muscle thickness, muscle strength, and muscle endurance compared with those in the nonrunning groups.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quantitative cohort design.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2b.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 78 subjects aged 18 to 27 years were divided into 3 groups: runners, active, and inactive. Assessment included abdominal muscle thickness via diagnostic ultrasound (Mindray North America), strength using a static Isotrack dynamometer (JTech Medical), and abdominal muscle endurance using a side plank. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance, <i>t</i> tests, and Pearson's correlation coefficients and partial correlations was performed using SPSS Version 26 with a significance level of <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly greater muscle thickness of internal obliques (IOs) at rest and during contraction was found in the running group compared with the active group, the active group compared with the inactive group, and the running group compared with the inactive group. There were no statistically significant differences in overall strength measured by dynamometry among the 3 groups. Plank time was significantly greater for the running group compared with the other 2 groups. Male participants were greater in all areas: strength, plank time as a measure of muscle endurance, and muscle thickness. Body mass index was significantly correlated with resting thickness, muscle endurance, and muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persons who run, are active, and are inactive use their abdominal muscles differently. Runners have thicker IOs and better abdominal muscle endurance than the other 2 groups. Focusing on endurance training of the obliques may be beneficial for persons who run.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This research could contribute to developing core training programs to ensure runners target the correct abdominal muscles with the best type of training.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"950-957"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Abdominal Muscle Thickness, Strength, and Endurance in Persons Who Are Runners, Active, and Inactive.\",\"authors\":\"Beth H Schaeffer, Wendy K Anemaet, Allison L Arnold, Autumn B Brabham, Nancy K Groom, Cassidee R Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381231212471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Core musculature is important for efficiency during activities including running. Both abdominal muscle strength and endurance contribute to this efficiency. The purpose of this study is to determine what differences and relationships exist in abdominal muscle thickness, strength, and endurance among persons who are runners, active, and inactive.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Persons in the running group would show significantly greater abdominal muscle thickness, muscle strength, and muscle endurance compared with those in the nonrunning groups.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quantitative cohort design.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2b.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 78 subjects aged 18 to 27 years were divided into 3 groups: runners, active, and inactive. Assessment included abdominal muscle thickness via diagnostic ultrasound (Mindray North America), strength using a static Isotrack dynamometer (JTech Medical), and abdominal muscle endurance using a side plank. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance, <i>t</i> tests, and Pearson's correlation coefficients and partial correlations was performed using SPSS Version 26 with a significance level of <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly greater muscle thickness of internal obliques (IOs) at rest and during contraction was found in the running group compared with the active group, the active group compared with the inactive group, and the running group compared with the inactive group. There were no statistically significant differences in overall strength measured by dynamometry among the 3 groups. Plank time was significantly greater for the running group compared with the other 2 groups. Male participants were greater in all areas: strength, plank time as a measure of muscle endurance, and muscle thickness. Body mass index was significantly correlated with resting thickness, muscle endurance, and muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persons who run, are active, and are inactive use their abdominal muscles differently. Runners have thicker IOs and better abdominal muscle endurance than the other 2 groups. Focusing on endurance training of the obliques may be beneficial for persons who run.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This research could contribute to developing core training programs to ensure runners target the correct abdominal muscles with the best type of training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"950-957\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231212471\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231212471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:核心肌肉组织对跑步等活动的效率很重要。腹肌力量和耐力都有助于这种效率。本研究的目的是确定跑步者、运动者和不运动者在腹部肌肉厚度、力量和耐力方面存在的差异和关系。假设:与非跑步组相比,跑步组的人会表现出更大的腹肌厚度、肌肉力量和肌肉耐力。研究设计:定量队列设计。证据等级:2b级。方法:将78名年龄在18 ~ 27岁的受试者分为跑步组、运动组和不运动组。评估包括通过超声诊断的腹肌厚度(迈瑞北美),使用静态等距测力仪的力量(JTech Medical),以及使用侧板的腹肌耐力。统计学分析采用方差分析、t检验、Pearson相关系数和偏相关分析,采用SPSS Version 26,显著性水平P < 0.05。结果:与运动组相比,运动组与不运动组相比,运动组与不运动组相比,运动组与不运动组相比,运动组与不运动组相比,运动组与不运动组相比,运动组与不运动组相比,运动组与不运动组相比,运动组与不运动组相比,运动组的内斜肌(IOs)在休息和收缩时的肌肉厚度均显著增加。三组患者的肌力测量结果无统计学差异。与其他两组相比,跑步组的平板支撑时间明显更长。男性参与者在所有方面都更强:力量、平板支撑时间(衡量肌肉耐力)和肌肉厚度。体重指数与静息厚度、肌肉耐力和肌肉力量显著相关。结论:跑步、运动和不运动的人使用腹部肌肉的方式不同。跑步者比其他两组有更厚的腹肌和更好的腹肌耐力。专注于斜肌的耐力训练可能对跑步者有益。临床意义:这项研究有助于制定核心训练计划,以确保跑步者以最佳训练类型瞄准正确的腹部肌肉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Abdominal Muscle Thickness, Strength, and Endurance in Persons Who Are Runners, Active, and Inactive.

Background: Core musculature is important for efficiency during activities including running. Both abdominal muscle strength and endurance contribute to this efficiency. The purpose of this study is to determine what differences and relationships exist in abdominal muscle thickness, strength, and endurance among persons who are runners, active, and inactive.

Hypothesis: Persons in the running group would show significantly greater abdominal muscle thickness, muscle strength, and muscle endurance compared with those in the nonrunning groups.

Study design: Quantitative cohort design.

Level of evidence: Level 2b.

Methods: A total of 78 subjects aged 18 to 27 years were divided into 3 groups: runners, active, and inactive. Assessment included abdominal muscle thickness via diagnostic ultrasound (Mindray North America), strength using a static Isotrack dynamometer (JTech Medical), and abdominal muscle endurance using a side plank. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance, t tests, and Pearson's correlation coefficients and partial correlations was performed using SPSS Version 26 with a significance level of P < 0.05.

Results: Significantly greater muscle thickness of internal obliques (IOs) at rest and during contraction was found in the running group compared with the active group, the active group compared with the inactive group, and the running group compared with the inactive group. There were no statistically significant differences in overall strength measured by dynamometry among the 3 groups. Plank time was significantly greater for the running group compared with the other 2 groups. Male participants were greater in all areas: strength, plank time as a measure of muscle endurance, and muscle thickness. Body mass index was significantly correlated with resting thickness, muscle endurance, and muscle strength.

Conclusion: Persons who run, are active, and are inactive use their abdominal muscles differently. Runners have thicker IOs and better abdominal muscle endurance than the other 2 groups. Focusing on endurance training of the obliques may be beneficial for persons who run.

Clinical relevance: This research could contribute to developing core training programs to ensure runners target the correct abdominal muscles with the best type of training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信