选择测量多发性硬化症患者照护者健康溢出效应的最佳工具。

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hoda Faraji PharmD, PhD , Fatemeh Soleymani PharmD, MPH, PhD , Mehdi Yaseri PhD , Mohammad Ali Sahraian MD , Akbar Abdollahiasl PharmD, PhD , Azin Meftah MSc , Shekoufeh Nikfar PharmD, MPH, PhD
{"title":"选择测量多发性硬化症患者照护者健康溢出效应的最佳工具。","authors":"Hoda Faraji PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Soleymani PharmD, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Mehdi Yaseri PhD ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Sahraian MD ,&nbsp;Akbar Abdollahiasl PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Azin Meftah MSc ,&nbsp;Shekoufeh Nikfar PharmD, MPH, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To measure the health spillover effect in caregivers of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), we aimed to select the best instrument from 2 common health-related quality of life (QoL) instruments, the 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) and the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3), by assessing them.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using consecutive sampling, 452 primary caregivers of patients with MS were asked to fill out a Care-related QoL instrument (CarerQol-7D), EQ-5D-3L, HUI-3, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale between October 2019 and May 2020. Convergent and clinical validity were assessed to measure spillover effect in caregivers of patients with MS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A strong correlation of health-utility scores between EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 (r = 0.914, <em>P</em> &lt; .01) was observed. The 95% limit of agreement (LoA) for CarerQol-7D and HUI-3 (−10.6 to 8.2) was narrower than the LoA for CarerQol-7D and EQ-5D-3L (−15.1 to 17.1). Both EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 proved clinical validity for the QoL of caregivers. The CarerQoL-7D score was significantly lower in female (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), single (<em>P</em> &lt; .014), lower-educated (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), parent’s relatives (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), and unemployed (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found that both, EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3, were appropriate for measuring caregivers’ QoL, although HUI-3 was a better choice because of its narrower LoA. Our findings suggest researchers should use HUI-3 to measure the quality-adjusted life-year of caregivers to aggregate with the QoL of patients in the denominator of an economic evaluation equation, such as the cost-effective ratio.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000857/pdfft?md5=4e518426307c655ce768e65ace4adb53&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109923000857-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing the Best Instrument for Measuring Health Spillover Effect in Caregivers of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"Hoda Faraji PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Soleymani PharmD, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Mehdi Yaseri PhD ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Sahraian MD ,&nbsp;Akbar Abdollahiasl PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Azin Meftah MSc ,&nbsp;Shekoufeh Nikfar PharmD, MPH, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To measure the health spillover effect in caregivers of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), we aimed to select the best instrument from 2 common health-related quality of life (QoL) instruments, the 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) and the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3), by assessing them.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using consecutive sampling, 452 primary caregivers of patients with MS were asked to fill out a Care-related QoL instrument (CarerQol-7D), EQ-5D-3L, HUI-3, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale between October 2019 and May 2020. Convergent and clinical validity were assessed to measure spillover effect in caregivers of patients with MS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A strong correlation of health-utility scores between EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 (r = 0.914, <em>P</em> &lt; .01) was observed. The 95% limit of agreement (LoA) for CarerQol-7D and HUI-3 (−10.6 to 8.2) was narrower than the LoA for CarerQol-7D and EQ-5D-3L (−15.1 to 17.1). Both EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 proved clinical validity for the QoL of caregivers. The CarerQoL-7D score was significantly lower in female (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), single (<em>P</em> &lt; .014), lower-educated (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), parent’s relatives (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), and unemployed (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found that both, EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3, were appropriate for measuring caregivers’ QoL, although HUI-3 was a better choice because of its narrower LoA. Our findings suggest researchers should use HUI-3 to measure the quality-adjusted life-year of caregivers to aggregate with the QoL of patients in the denominator of an economic evaluation equation, such as the cost-effective ratio.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000857/pdfft?md5=4e518426307c655ce768e65ace4adb53&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109923000857-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了衡量多发性硬化症(MS)患者护理人员的健康溢出效应,我们旨在通过对两种常见的与健康相关的生活质量(QoL)工具,即3级EQ-5D (EQ-5D- 3l)和健康效用指数标记3 (HUI-3)进行评估,从中选择最佳工具。方法:采用连续抽样的方法,于2019年10月至2020年5月期间,要求452名MS患者的主要护理人员填写护理相关生活质量量表(CarerQol-7D)、EQ-5D-3L、HUI-3和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表。结果:EQ-5D-3L与HUI-3的健康效用评分具有较强的相关性(r = 0.914, P < 0.01)。CarerQol-7D和HUI-3的95%一致度限(LoA)(-10.6 ~ 8.2)小于CarerQol-7D和EQ-5D-3L的95%一致度限(LoA)(-15.1 ~ 17.1)。EQ-5D-3L和HUI-3对护理人员生活质量的评估均具有临床有效性。CarerQoL-7D评分在女性(P < .001)、单身(P < .014)、受教育程度较低(P < .001)、父母亲属(P < .001)和失业(P < .001)照顾者中显著较低。结论:我们发现EQ-5D-3L和HUI-3都适用于衡量照顾者的生活质量,尽管HUI-3是更好的选择,因为它的LoA更窄。我们的研究结果表明,研究人员应该使用HUI-3来衡量护理人员的质量调整生命年,并将患者的生活质量汇总到经济评估方程的分母中,如成本效益比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choosing the Best Instrument for Measuring Health Spillover Effect in Caregivers of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Objectives

To measure the health spillover effect in caregivers of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), we aimed to select the best instrument from 2 common health-related quality of life (QoL) instruments, the 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) and the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3), by assessing them.

Methods

Using consecutive sampling, 452 primary caregivers of patients with MS were asked to fill out a Care-related QoL instrument (CarerQol-7D), EQ-5D-3L, HUI-3, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale between October 2019 and May 2020. Convergent and clinical validity were assessed to measure spillover effect in caregivers of patients with MS.

Results

A strong correlation of health-utility scores between EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 (r = 0.914, P < .01) was observed. The 95% limit of agreement (LoA) for CarerQol-7D and HUI-3 (−10.6 to 8.2) was narrower than the LoA for CarerQol-7D and EQ-5D-3L (−15.1 to 17.1). Both EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 proved clinical validity for the QoL of caregivers. The CarerQoL-7D score was significantly lower in female (P < .001), single (P < .014), lower-educated (P < .001), parent’s relatives (P < .001), and unemployed (P < .001) caregivers.

Conclusions

We found that both, EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3, were appropriate for measuring caregivers’ QoL, although HUI-3 was a better choice because of its narrower LoA. Our findings suggest researchers should use HUI-3 to measure the quality-adjusted life-year of caregivers to aggregate with the QoL of patients in the denominator of an economic evaluation equation, such as the cost-effective ratio.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信