Endocardial pacing compared to epicardial left ventricle pacing and right ventricle pacing: A single-center long-term experience in a pediatric population

Background and aims

Pediatric pacing is usually performed as epicardial pacing in small children in need of pacemaker therapy. Epicardial pacing compared with transvenous pacing for pediatric complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) has different strengths and weaknesses. The epicardial left ventricular wall position of the lead has been considered superior, in terms of contraction pattern, compared to a transvenous right ventricular stimulation. We aimed to compare QRS duration and cardiac function before and after the switch from epicardial to transvenous pacing in a pediatric population.

Methods

Pediatric patients with congenital or acquired CAVB, who underwent a switch from epicardial-to transvenous pacing at our center from 2005 to 2021, were identified through the national ICD- and Pacemaker Registry. Data regarding clinical status, ECG, and echocardiography before and after the switch and at last follow-up were collected.

Results

We included 15 children. The median age at the switch was 6.7 (4.4–11.7) years with a median weight of 21 (15–39) Kg. The median QRS duration with the transvenous systems was 136 (128–152) ms vs. a QRS duration during epicardial stimulation of 150 (144–170) ms with a median difference in QRS duration of 14 (6–20) ms. Children with a post-surgical AV block had a broader QRS duration, both with epicardial and endocardial stimulation. Before the switch, there was one patient with impaired left ventricular function (LVF) but with normal left ventricular end-diastolic diameters. After the switch, one patient developed symptomatic LV dysfunction with the recovery of LVF at the last follow-up after being implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy device.

Conclusions

Our report of pediatric patients after switching from epicardial to transvenous pacing shows how transvenous pacing is not inferior to epicardial pacing in terms of QRS duration and no significant deterioration of cardiac function was detectable.