生态形态不是物种:当地适应的红十字鸟种群就是这样

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Geoffrey E. Hill, Matthew J. Powers
{"title":"生态形态不是物种:当地适应的红十字鸟种群就是这样","authors":"Geoffrey E. Hill,&nbsp;Matthew J. Powers","doi":"10.1111/jav.02896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The process of speciation remains poorly understood and hence definitions of species continue to be a focus of sharp debate. A key unresolved issue in speciation debates is whether local populations that are somewhat distinct from a parent population in morphology or genotype but that remain connected to the parent population via gene flow should be recognized as species. The species status of the Cassia crossbill <i>Loxia sinesciuris</i>, as well as other distinctive populations in the red crossbill <i>Loxia curvirostra</i> clade including the parrot crossbill <i>L. pytyopsittacus</i> and the Scottish crossbill <i>L. scotica</i>, are test cases for whether the hundreds of other avian ecomorphs should be taxonomically elevated to full species. We argue that these regional populations of red crossbills do not meet stated criteria for species designation under the Biological Species Concept and, regardless of species concept, fail as species simply following logic, parsimony, and consistency. There are no diagnostic morphological characteristics that definitively separate birds in the Cassia crossbill, parrot crossbill, or Scottish crossbill populations from birds in other sympatric crossbill populations. Call type, the behavioral characteristic that is proposed to distinguish Cassia crossbills, parrot crossbills and Scottish crossbills from other populations of crossbills, is learned and can change within the life of an individual. There is evidence of substantial on-going gene flow between Cassia crossbills, parrot crossbills, and Scottish crossbill and other populations of red crossbills, and there is no divergence in mitochondrial genotype. Instead, there exist few fixed genetic differences in nuclear genotype between individuals from these local crossbill populations and individuals from other red crossbill populations. We propose that the recognition of the Cassia crossbill, parrot crossbill and Scottish crossbill as species sets a poor precedent in avian taxonomy and muddles understanding of the process of speciation.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jav.02896","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecomorphs are not species: the case of locally adapted populations of red crossbills\",\"authors\":\"Geoffrey E. Hill,&nbsp;Matthew J. Powers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jav.02896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The process of speciation remains poorly understood and hence definitions of species continue to be a focus of sharp debate. A key unresolved issue in speciation debates is whether local populations that are somewhat distinct from a parent population in morphology or genotype but that remain connected to the parent population via gene flow should be recognized as species. The species status of the Cassia crossbill <i>Loxia sinesciuris</i>, as well as other distinctive populations in the red crossbill <i>Loxia curvirostra</i> clade including the parrot crossbill <i>L. pytyopsittacus</i> and the Scottish crossbill <i>L. scotica</i>, are test cases for whether the hundreds of other avian ecomorphs should be taxonomically elevated to full species. We argue that these regional populations of red crossbills do not meet stated criteria for species designation under the Biological Species Concept and, regardless of species concept, fail as species simply following logic, parsimony, and consistency. There are no diagnostic morphological characteristics that definitively separate birds in the Cassia crossbill, parrot crossbill, or Scottish crossbill populations from birds in other sympatric crossbill populations. Call type, the behavioral characteristic that is proposed to distinguish Cassia crossbills, parrot crossbills and Scottish crossbills from other populations of crossbills, is learned and can change within the life of an individual. There is evidence of substantial on-going gene flow between Cassia crossbills, parrot crossbills, and Scottish crossbill and other populations of red crossbills, and there is no divergence in mitochondrial genotype. Instead, there exist few fixed genetic differences in nuclear genotype between individuals from these local crossbill populations and individuals from other red crossbill populations. We propose that the recognition of the Cassia crossbill, parrot crossbill and Scottish crossbill as species sets a poor precedent in avian taxonomy and muddles understanding of the process of speciation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jav.02896\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jav.02896\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jav.02896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物种形成的过程仍然知之甚少,因此物种的定义仍然是激烈辩论的焦点。在物种形成的争论中,一个关键的未解决的问题是,在形态或基因型上与亲本种群有所不同,但通过基因流与亲本种群保持联系的本地种群是否应被视为物种。Cassia crossbill Loxia sinesciuris的物种地位,以及其他红crossbill Loxia curvirostra分支中的独特种群,包括鹦鹉crossbill L. pytyopsittacus和苏格兰crossbill L. scotica,是是否应该在分类学上将其他数百种鸟类生态形态提升到完整物种的测试案例。我们认为,这些区域红叉鸟种群不符合生物物种概念下的物种指定标准,而且,不管物种概念如何,作为物种仅仅遵循逻辑、简约和一致性就失败了。没有诊断的形态学特征明确地将决明子交喙、鹦鹉交喙或苏格兰交喙种群的鸟类与其他同域交喙种群的鸟类区分开来。鸣叫类型是一种行为特征,被认为是区分Cassia crossbill、parrot crossbill和苏格兰crossbill与其他crossbill种群的区别,这种行为特征是后天习得的,并且在个体的一生中会发生变化。有证据表明,决明子交喙、鹦鹉交喙、苏格兰交喙和其他红交喙种群之间存在大量持续的基因流动,线粒体基因型没有差异。相反,这些地方红嘴鸦群体的个体与其他红嘴鸦群体的个体在核基因型上几乎没有固定的遗传差异。我们认为,将Cassia crossbill、parrot crossbill和Scottish crossbill视为物种,在鸟类分类学上开了一个不好的先例,混淆了对物种形成过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecomorphs are not species: the case of locally adapted populations of red crossbills

The process of speciation remains poorly understood and hence definitions of species continue to be a focus of sharp debate. A key unresolved issue in speciation debates is whether local populations that are somewhat distinct from a parent population in morphology or genotype but that remain connected to the parent population via gene flow should be recognized as species. The species status of the Cassia crossbill Loxia sinesciuris, as well as other distinctive populations in the red crossbill Loxia curvirostra clade including the parrot crossbill L. pytyopsittacus and the Scottish crossbill L. scotica, are test cases for whether the hundreds of other avian ecomorphs should be taxonomically elevated to full species. We argue that these regional populations of red crossbills do not meet stated criteria for species designation under the Biological Species Concept and, regardless of species concept, fail as species simply following logic, parsimony, and consistency. There are no diagnostic morphological characteristics that definitively separate birds in the Cassia crossbill, parrot crossbill, or Scottish crossbill populations from birds in other sympatric crossbill populations. Call type, the behavioral characteristic that is proposed to distinguish Cassia crossbills, parrot crossbills and Scottish crossbills from other populations of crossbills, is learned and can change within the life of an individual. There is evidence of substantial on-going gene flow between Cassia crossbills, parrot crossbills, and Scottish crossbill and other populations of red crossbills, and there is no divergence in mitochondrial genotype. Instead, there exist few fixed genetic differences in nuclear genotype between individuals from these local crossbill populations and individuals from other red crossbill populations. We propose that the recognition of the Cassia crossbill, parrot crossbill and Scottish crossbill as species sets a poor precedent in avian taxonomy and muddles understanding of the process of speciation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信