{"title":"健壮的行动和场景:一个反驳","authors":"Nicholas J. Rowland, Matthew J. Spaniol","doi":"10.1002/ffo2.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is a rejoinder in response to commentaries written about a 25-year retrospective on Kees van der Heijden's seminal text <i>Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation</i>. As a means to explore the commentaries and—without irony—bring them into conversation with one another, this piece engages in a thought experiment about the impact of <i>Scenarios</i> as well as the book's author through the sociologically informed notion of robust action from traditional thinking about social embeddedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":100567,"journal":{"name":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ffo2.128","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust action and scenarios: A rejoinder\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas J. Rowland, Matthew J. Spaniol\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ffo2.128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article is a rejoinder in response to commentaries written about a 25-year retrospective on Kees van der Heijden's seminal text <i>Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation</i>. As a means to explore the commentaries and—without irony—bring them into conversation with one another, this piece engages in a thought experiment about the impact of <i>Scenarios</i> as well as the book's author through the sociologically informed notion of robust action from traditional thinking about social embeddedness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ffo2.128\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章是对Kees van der Heijden的开创性文本《情景:战略对话的艺术》25年回顾的评论的回应。作为一种探索评论的方式——不带讽刺意味地——将他们带入彼此的对话中，这篇文章通过对社会嵌入性的传统思考中强健行动的社会学知识概念，参与了一个关于情景影响的思想实验，以及这本书的作者。
This article is a rejoinder in response to commentaries written about a 25-year retrospective on Kees van der Heijden's seminal text Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. As a means to explore the commentaries and—without irony—bring them into conversation with one another, this piece engages in a thought experiment about the impact of Scenarios as well as the book's author through the sociologically informed notion of robust action from traditional thinking about social embeddedness.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
