评估慢性呼吸道疾病的后果:一项重要综述。

S J Williams
{"title":"评估慢性呼吸道疾病的后果:一项重要综述。","authors":"S J Williams","doi":"10.3109/03790798909166669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper offers an overview of problems involved in assessing respiratory disablement. Health status and quality of life research have become of increasing importance but critical gaps remain, especially in relation to the multidimensional consequences of chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD). It is argued that much existing psychosocial research has been long on the 'psycho' and short on the wider social consequences and dimensions of respiratory disablement. Many general measures of quality of life and disability are not well suited to assessment of these problems. There is a need to supplement general instruments with more disease-specific measures--many for breathlessness, the most disabling symptom of COAD, have been crude and insensitive. There is also a need to augment predominantly quantitative techniques with qualitative data derived from patients' and carers' perspectives. Wider implications of disability assessment at the welfare policy level are discussed, and the paper concludes by suggesting future research areas on respiratory disablement.</p>","PeriodicalId":77547,"journal":{"name":"International disability studies","volume":"11 4","pages":"161-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790798909166669","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the consequences of chronic respiratory disease: a critical review.\",\"authors\":\"S J Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/03790798909166669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper offers an overview of problems involved in assessing respiratory disablement. Health status and quality of life research have become of increasing importance but critical gaps remain, especially in relation to the multidimensional consequences of chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD). It is argued that much existing psychosocial research has been long on the 'psycho' and short on the wider social consequences and dimensions of respiratory disablement. Many general measures of quality of life and disability are not well suited to assessment of these problems. There is a need to supplement general instruments with more disease-specific measures--many for breathlessness, the most disabling symptom of COAD, have been crude and insensitive. There is also a need to augment predominantly quantitative techniques with qualitative data derived from patients' and carers' perspectives. Wider implications of disability assessment at the welfare policy level are discussed, and the paper concludes by suggesting future research areas on respiratory disablement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International disability studies\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"161-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790798909166669\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International disability studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790798909166669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International disability studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790798909166669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文概述了评估呼吸功能障碍所涉及的问题。健康状况和生活质量的研究变得越来越重要,但仍然存在严重的差距,特别是在慢性阻塞性气道疾病(COAD)的多方面后果方面。有人认为,许多现有的社会心理研究长期关注“心理”,而缺乏对呼吸障碍的更广泛的社会后果和层面的关注。许多生活质量和残疾的一般衡量标准不太适合评估这些问题。有必要用更多的疾病特异性措施来补充一般仪器——许多用于呼吸困难(COAD最严重的致残性症状)的措施都是粗糙和不敏感的。还需要用从患者和护理人员的角度获得的定性数据来加强主要的定量技术。本文讨论了残疾评估在福利政策层面的更广泛意义,并提出了呼吸残疾未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the consequences of chronic respiratory disease: a critical review.

This paper offers an overview of problems involved in assessing respiratory disablement. Health status and quality of life research have become of increasing importance but critical gaps remain, especially in relation to the multidimensional consequences of chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD). It is argued that much existing psychosocial research has been long on the 'psycho' and short on the wider social consequences and dimensions of respiratory disablement. Many general measures of quality of life and disability are not well suited to assessment of these problems. There is a need to supplement general instruments with more disease-specific measures--many for breathlessness, the most disabling symptom of COAD, have been crude and insensitive. There is also a need to augment predominantly quantitative techniques with qualitative data derived from patients' and carers' perspectives. Wider implications of disability assessment at the welfare policy level are discussed, and the paper concludes by suggesting future research areas on respiratory disablement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信