社会公正结果与专业咨询:11年内容分析

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Madeline Clark, Jeffry Moe, Christian D. Chan, Mihkaya D. Best, Laura M. Mallow
{"title":"社会公正结果与专业咨询:11年内容分析","authors":"Madeline Clark,&nbsp;Jeffry Moe,&nbsp;Christian D. Chan,&nbsp;Mihkaya D. Best,&nbsp;Laura M. Mallow","doi":"10.1002/jcad.12427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Articles that assessed the outcomes of interventions based on multicultural-social justice principles, and that were published in a journal sponsored by the American Counseling Association or its divisions, Chi Sigma Iota, or the National Board for Certified Counselors, were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. A total of <i>N</i> = 35 empirical studies were identified for inclusion. The year published, methodology, population studied, sample size, operationalized constructs, and whether the study espoused a systemic or community focus were coded. Principal findings indicated a slight increase in multicultural-social justice outcome research over time, a need for more rigorous multicultural-social justice outcome research, and a need for scholars and practitioners to enhance their systemic and community-based conceptualizations of their clients’ presenting concerns. Other implications for counseling, limitations, and future directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social justice outcomes and professional counseling: An 11-year content analysis\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Clark,&nbsp;Jeffry Moe,&nbsp;Christian D. Chan,&nbsp;Mihkaya D. Best,&nbsp;Laura M. Mallow\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcad.12427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Articles that assessed the outcomes of interventions based on multicultural-social justice principles, and that were published in a journal sponsored by the American Counseling Association or its divisions, Chi Sigma Iota, or the National Board for Certified Counselors, were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. A total of <i>N</i> = 35 empirical studies were identified for inclusion. The year published, methodology, population studied, sample size, operationalized constructs, and whether the study espoused a systemic or community focus were coded. Principal findings indicated a slight increase in multicultural-social justice outcome research over time, a need for more rigorous multicultural-social justice outcome research, and a need for scholars and practitioners to enhance their systemic and community-based conceptualizations of their clients’ presenting concerns. Other implications for counseling, limitations, and future directions are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counseling and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counseling and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcad.12427\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling and Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcad.12427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估基于多元文化-社会正义原则的干预结果的文章,发表在由美国咨询协会或其分支机构,Chi Sigma Iota或国家注册咨询师委员会赞助的期刊上,使用定性内容分析进行分析。共有N = 35个实证研究被纳入。对发表年份、方法、研究人群、样本量、可操作结构以及研究是否支持系统性或社区重点进行了编码。主要研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,多元文化-社会正义结果研究略有增加,需要更严格的多元文化-社会正义结果研究,学者和从业者需要加强他们对客户所关注的问题的系统和基于社区的概念化。对咨询的其他含义、局限性和未来方向进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social justice outcomes and professional counseling: An 11-year content analysis

Articles that assessed the outcomes of interventions based on multicultural-social justice principles, and that were published in a journal sponsored by the American Counseling Association or its divisions, Chi Sigma Iota, or the National Board for Certified Counselors, were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. A total of N = 35 empirical studies were identified for inclusion. The year published, methodology, population studied, sample size, operationalized constructs, and whether the study espoused a systemic or community focus were coded. Principal findings indicated a slight increase in multicultural-social justice outcome research over time, a need for more rigorous multicultural-social justice outcome research, and a need for scholars and practitioners to enhance their systemic and community-based conceptualizations of their clients’ presenting concerns. Other implications for counseling, limitations, and future directions are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Counseling & Development publishes practice, theory, and research articles across 18 different specialty areas and work settings. Sections include research, assessment and diagnosis, theory and practice, and trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信