腕脱位诊断中Gilula线观察者内和观察者间的变异性

Antonio García-Jiménez , Ignasi Gich-Saladich , Judit Martínez-Zaragoza
{"title":"腕脱位诊断中Gilula线观察者内和观察者间的变异性","authors":"Antonio García-Jiménez ,&nbsp;Ignasi Gich-Saladich ,&nbsp;Judit Martínez-Zaragoza","doi":"10.1016/j.rccot.2022.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Alteration of Gilula's lines in the posteroanterior (PA) radiology of the wrist is a sign of perilunate dislocation. Our objective is to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the Gilula lines in perilunate dislocations and the agreement between general orthopaedic surgeons, hand surgeons and residents of orthopaedic surgery, who participated in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Six observers evaluated 30 PA carpal X-rays, including 15 with a diagnosis of perilunate dislocation and 15 without carpal lesions. These observers were the residents of orthopaedic surgery; orthopaedic surgeons not specialised in hand pathology and hand surgeons. All had to classify the X-rays as normal or pathological attending only to Gilula's lines. We calculated the intraobserver and interobserver variability using the Kappa coefficient.</p><p>In this study, we have discussed indistinctively of concordance, agreement and variability as synonyms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Intraobserver concordance was very good (0.867–1.000) in residents and in hand surgeons, and moderate or good (0.553–0.795) in general orthopaedic surgeons.</p><p>Interobserver concordance was very good (0.875) among hand surgeons, while it was good among general orthopaedic surgeons (0.679) and residents (0.751).</p><p>Interobserver concordance was greater among residents and hand surgeons (Kappa 0.875, very good agreement) than among residents and general orthopaedic surgeons (Kappa 0.702, good agreement).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The observation of Gilula lines is a good diagnostic method in case of suspicion of perilunate dislocation, with good intraobserver and interobserver agreement both in traumatologists in training and those who are already trained, whether or not they are specialists in hand surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101098,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Ortopedia y Traumatología","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 86-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variabilidad intraobservador e interobservador de las líneas de Gilula en el diagnóstico de las luxaciones carpianas\",\"authors\":\"Antonio García-Jiménez ,&nbsp;Ignasi Gich-Saladich ,&nbsp;Judit Martínez-Zaragoza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rccot.2022.04.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Alteration of Gilula's lines in the posteroanterior (PA) radiology of the wrist is a sign of perilunate dislocation. Our objective is to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the Gilula lines in perilunate dislocations and the agreement between general orthopaedic surgeons, hand surgeons and residents of orthopaedic surgery, who participated in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Six observers evaluated 30 PA carpal X-rays, including 15 with a diagnosis of perilunate dislocation and 15 without carpal lesions. These observers were the residents of orthopaedic surgery; orthopaedic surgeons not specialised in hand pathology and hand surgeons. All had to classify the X-rays as normal or pathological attending only to Gilula's lines. We calculated the intraobserver and interobserver variability using the Kappa coefficient.</p><p>In this study, we have discussed indistinctively of concordance, agreement and variability as synonyms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Intraobserver concordance was very good (0.867–1.000) in residents and in hand surgeons, and moderate or good (0.553–0.795) in general orthopaedic surgeons.</p><p>Interobserver concordance was very good (0.875) among hand surgeons, while it was good among general orthopaedic surgeons (0.679) and residents (0.751).</p><p>Interobserver concordance was greater among residents and hand surgeons (Kappa 0.875, very good agreement) than among residents and general orthopaedic surgeons (Kappa 0.702, good agreement).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The observation of Gilula lines is a good diagnostic method in case of suspicion of perilunate dislocation, with good intraobserver and interobserver agreement both in traumatologists in training and those who are already trained, whether or not they are specialists in hand surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Ortopedia y Traumatología\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 86-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Ortopedia y Traumatología\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0120884522000256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Ortopedia y Traumatología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0120884522000256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的观察腕关节后前位影像学上的Gilula线改变是月骨周围脱位的表现。我们的目的是评估月骨周围脱位中Gilula线在观察者内和观察者间的可变性,以及参与研究的普通骨科医生、手外科医生和骨科住院医生之间的一致性。材料和方法6名观察人员评估了30例PA腕x线片,其中15例诊断为月骨周围脱位,15例无腕病变。观察对象为骨科住院医师;不是专门研究手部病理的整形外科医生和手外科医生。所有人都必须将x光片分为正常或病理,只关注Gilula线。我们使用Kappa系数计算观察者内部和观察者之间的可变性。在本研究中,我们对同义词的一致性、一致性和变异性进行了模糊的讨论。结果住院医师和手外科医师的观察者一致性为非常好(0.867 ~ 1.000),普通骨科医师的观察者一致性为中等或良好(0.553 ~ 0.795)。手外科医师的观察者间一致性很好(0.875),普通骨科医师的观察者间一致性很好(0.679),住院医师的观察者间一致性很好(0.751)。住院医生和手外科医生之间的观察者间一致性(Kappa 0.875,一致性非常好)高于住院医生和普通骨科医生之间的观察者间一致性(Kappa 0.702,一致性非常好)。结论观察吉鲁拉线是诊断怀疑月骨周围脱位的一种较好的方法,无论是培训中的创伤医师还是已培训的创伤医师,无论是否为手外科专科医师,均具有良好的观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variabilidad intraobservador e interobservador de las líneas de Gilula en el diagnóstico de las luxaciones carpianas

Objective

Alteration of Gilula's lines in the posteroanterior (PA) radiology of the wrist is a sign of perilunate dislocation. Our objective is to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the Gilula lines in perilunate dislocations and the agreement between general orthopaedic surgeons, hand surgeons and residents of orthopaedic surgery, who participated in the study.

Materials and methods

Six observers evaluated 30 PA carpal X-rays, including 15 with a diagnosis of perilunate dislocation and 15 without carpal lesions. These observers were the residents of orthopaedic surgery; orthopaedic surgeons not specialised in hand pathology and hand surgeons. All had to classify the X-rays as normal or pathological attending only to Gilula's lines. We calculated the intraobserver and interobserver variability using the Kappa coefficient.

In this study, we have discussed indistinctively of concordance, agreement and variability as synonyms.

Results

Intraobserver concordance was very good (0.867–1.000) in residents and in hand surgeons, and moderate or good (0.553–0.795) in general orthopaedic surgeons.

Interobserver concordance was very good (0.875) among hand surgeons, while it was good among general orthopaedic surgeons (0.679) and residents (0.751).

Interobserver concordance was greater among residents and hand surgeons (Kappa 0.875, very good agreement) than among residents and general orthopaedic surgeons (Kappa 0.702, good agreement).

Conclusion

The observation of Gilula lines is a good diagnostic method in case of suspicion of perilunate dislocation, with good intraobserver and interobserver agreement both in traumatologists in training and those who are already trained, whether or not they are specialists in hand surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信