权力而非参与:分权领土规划新方法的原则

Q4 Social Sciences
Geographie Economie Societe Pub Date : 2002-08-01
Patrick d’Aquino
{"title":"权力而非参与:分权领土规划新方法的原则","authors":"Patrick d’Aquino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the last 10 years, backing decentralized management of land and renewable resources has been an increasing relevant concern. However, the fundamental objectives of the baking (increasing autonomy of actors, evolution of decision making processes, sustainable management of resources) are not easy to appraise, specially because the participatory concept seems to have some backgrounds too technocratic to be suitable for the specific purpose of the local empowerment in land use planning. Our approach comes back to a learning-by-doing process far away from the universal and ‘ready to apply’ approaches and tools that always dominate, even in participatory approaches. Face to variability and uncertainty of the ‘territory complex’, the <em>Bottom-up Regional Planning</em> only tries to promote an endogenous process of concerted negotiation. In this case, planning is not a collective choice between several possibly scenarios, but an <em>accompanying</em> approach of a local decision-making process which feels his own way, supported by specifics <em>endogenous</em> information systems, from GIS and Role Playing Game to new computer modeling systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39784,"journal":{"name":"Geographie Economie Societe","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 57-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le pouvoir plutôt que la participation : les principes d’une nouvelle approche de la planification territoriale décentralisée\",\"authors\":\"Patrick d’Aquino\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the last 10 years, backing decentralized management of land and renewable resources has been an increasing relevant concern. However, the fundamental objectives of the baking (increasing autonomy of actors, evolution of decision making processes, sustainable management of resources) are not easy to appraise, specially because the participatory concept seems to have some backgrounds too technocratic to be suitable for the specific purpose of the local empowerment in land use planning. Our approach comes back to a learning-by-doing process far away from the universal and ‘ready to apply’ approaches and tools that always dominate, even in participatory approaches. Face to variability and uncertainty of the ‘territory complex’, the <em>Bottom-up Regional Planning</em> only tries to promote an endogenous process of concerted negotiation. In this case, planning is not a collective choice between several possibly scenarios, but an <em>accompanying</em> approach of a local decision-making process which feels his own way, supported by specifics <em>endogenous</em> information systems, from GIS and Role Playing Game to new computer modeling systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographie Economie Societe\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 57-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographie Economie Societe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1295926X02000059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographie Economie Societe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1295926X02000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,支持土地和可再生资源的权力下放管理已成为一个日益重要的问题。然而,烘焙的基本目标(增加行动者的自主权,决策过程的演变,资源的可持续管理)不容易评估,特别是因为参与性概念似乎有一些背景过于技术官僚,不适合土地利用规划中地方授权的具体目的。我们的方法回到了边做边学的过程,远离了普遍和“随时可用”的方法和工具,即使在参与式方法中也是如此。面对“地域情结”的可变性和不确定性,自下而上的区域规划只是试图促进一个内生的协调协商过程。在这种情况下,规划不是在几个可能的情景之间的集体选择,而是一种当地决策过程的伴随方法,这种决策过程有自己的方式,由具体的内生信息系统支持,从地理信息系统和角色扮演游戏到新的计算机建模系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Le pouvoir plutôt que la participation : les principes d’une nouvelle approche de la planification territoriale décentralisée

In the last 10 years, backing decentralized management of land and renewable resources has been an increasing relevant concern. However, the fundamental objectives of the baking (increasing autonomy of actors, evolution of decision making processes, sustainable management of resources) are not easy to appraise, specially because the participatory concept seems to have some backgrounds too technocratic to be suitable for the specific purpose of the local empowerment in land use planning. Our approach comes back to a learning-by-doing process far away from the universal and ‘ready to apply’ approaches and tools that always dominate, even in participatory approaches. Face to variability and uncertainty of the ‘territory complex’, the Bottom-up Regional Planning only tries to promote an endogenous process of concerted negotiation. In this case, planning is not a collective choice between several possibly scenarios, but an accompanying approach of a local decision-making process which feels his own way, supported by specifics endogenous information systems, from GIS and Role Playing Game to new computer modeling systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geographie Economie Societe
Geographie Economie Societe Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Conçue pour comprendre et analyser l"évolution des sociétés contemporaines, la revue Géographie Économie Société apporte une contribution originale et au plus haut niveau international, notamment dans le champ de l"économie territoriale où elle est le leader. Créée en 1999, Géographie Économie Société présente des articles scientifiques, des notes et des entretiens. Les dossiers thématiques et les numéros spéciaux permettent de faire le point des travaux scientifiques menés sur les thèmes les plus pertinents du moment. Les articles publiés, tous évalués par des pairs, rendent compte du renouveau de la recherche.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信