使用3D打印手术计划原型的患者对肿瘤手术程序的理解

Q3 Medicine
A. Tejo-Otero , A. Valls-Esteve , F. Fenollosa-Artés , A. Siles-Hinojosa , B. Nafria , M. Ayats , I. Buj-Corral , MC. Otero , J. Rubio-Palau , J. Munuera , L. Krauel
{"title":"使用3D打印手术计划原型的患者对肿瘤手术程序的理解","authors":"A. Tejo-Otero ,&nbsp;A. Valls-Esteve ,&nbsp;F. Fenollosa-Artés ,&nbsp;A. Siles-Hinojosa ,&nbsp;B. Nafria ,&nbsp;M. Ayats ,&nbsp;I. Buj-Corral ,&nbsp;MC. Otero ,&nbsp;J. Rubio-Palau ,&nbsp;J. Munuera ,&nbsp;L. Krauel","doi":"10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patient understanding of complex surgical procedures and post-intervention consequences is often poor. Little is known about the effectiveness of 3D printed models to improve the comprehension of the medical information provided to patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if 3D printed patient-specific anatomical models could help improve patients’ satisfaction and understanding of complex oncological surgical procedures, their risks, benefits, and alternatives.</p></div><div><h3>Basic procedure</h3><p>A randomized, controlled crossover experiment was performed, where subjects were randomly assigned to different treatments of the study. This experiment involved teenage patients experts from Kids Barcelona, a Young Person's Advisory Group. The team (<em>n</em> = 14, age range 14–20, 9 females and 5 males) was divided into two groups involved in two simulated pre-surgical outpatient visits for complex oncologic surgical procedures: a high-risk stage 4 abdominal neuroblastoma, and a biliary tract rhabdomyosarcoma. Two senior oncologic surgeons participated in the study by performing the structured outpatient pre-surgical visit. Each participant received information before the study explaining the study methodology and was given a questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><p>Data analysis of the group using the 3D printed model for the neuroblastoma case showed better results than without the 3D model. On the other hand, conversely, on the data analysis of the rhabdomyosarcoma case with the 3D printed model no better results were observed as compared to the case of not using a 3D model. However, the results of the participants’ knowledge were still better than before the intervention. Satisfaction was significantly better with a 3D model in both cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of 3D physical models improves the patient's knowledge and shows the effectiveness of 3D printed models to enhance the comprehension of the medical information provided to patients and improve satisfaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72210,"journal":{"name":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000248/pdfft?md5=ab5bad2fe4fb84bf615d95c05f242b08&pid=1-s2.0-S2666964122000248-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient comprehension of oncologic surgical procedures using 3D printed surgical planning prototypes\",\"authors\":\"A. Tejo-Otero ,&nbsp;A. Valls-Esteve ,&nbsp;F. Fenollosa-Artés ,&nbsp;A. Siles-Hinojosa ,&nbsp;B. Nafria ,&nbsp;M. Ayats ,&nbsp;I. Buj-Corral ,&nbsp;MC. Otero ,&nbsp;J. Rubio-Palau ,&nbsp;J. Munuera ,&nbsp;L. Krauel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patient understanding of complex surgical procedures and post-intervention consequences is often poor. Little is known about the effectiveness of 3D printed models to improve the comprehension of the medical information provided to patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if 3D printed patient-specific anatomical models could help improve patients’ satisfaction and understanding of complex oncological surgical procedures, their risks, benefits, and alternatives.</p></div><div><h3>Basic procedure</h3><p>A randomized, controlled crossover experiment was performed, where subjects were randomly assigned to different treatments of the study. This experiment involved teenage patients experts from Kids Barcelona, a Young Person's Advisory Group. The team (<em>n</em> = 14, age range 14–20, 9 females and 5 males) was divided into two groups involved in two simulated pre-surgical outpatient visits for complex oncologic surgical procedures: a high-risk stage 4 abdominal neuroblastoma, and a biliary tract rhabdomyosarcoma. Two senior oncologic surgeons participated in the study by performing the structured outpatient pre-surgical visit. Each participant received information before the study explaining the study methodology and was given a questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><p>Data analysis of the group using the 3D printed model for the neuroblastoma case showed better results than without the 3D model. On the other hand, conversely, on the data analysis of the rhabdomyosarcoma case with the 3D printed model no better results were observed as compared to the case of not using a 3D model. However, the results of the participants’ knowledge were still better than before the intervention. Satisfaction was significantly better with a 3D model in both cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of 3D physical models improves the patient's knowledge and shows the effectiveness of 3D printed models to enhance the comprehension of the medical information provided to patients and improve satisfaction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000248/pdfft?md5=ab5bad2fe4fb84bf615d95c05f242b08&pid=1-s2.0-S2666964122000248-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的患者对复杂的手术过程和术后后果的理解往往较差。人们对3D打印模型在提高患者对医疗信息的理解方面的有效性知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定3D打印患者特异性解剖模型是否有助于提高患者对复杂肿瘤外科手术的满意度和理解,以及其风险、益处和替代方案。基本程序进行了随机对照交叉实验,其中受试者被随机分配到研究的不同处理。这个实验的参与者是青少年患者,来自巴塞罗那儿童咨询小组的专家。研究小组(n = 14,年龄范围14 - 20岁,9名女性和5名男性)被分为两组,参与两次模拟复杂肿瘤外科手术的术前门诊就诊:高风险的4期腹部神经母细胞瘤和胆道横纹肌肉瘤。两名资深肿瘤外科医生参与了这项研究,进行了有组织的门诊术前访问。每个参与者在研究前都收到了解释研究方法的信息,并收到了一份问卷。数据分析显示,使用3D打印神经母细胞瘤模型的组比不使用3D模型的组效果更好。另一方面,相反,在横纹肌肉瘤病例的数据分析中,使用3D打印模型的结果与不使用3D模型的结果相比没有更好的观察到。然而,参与者的知识结果仍然比干预前好。在这两种情况下,满意度都明显高于3D模型。结论3D物理模型的使用提高了患者的知识水平,显示了3D打印模型在增强患者对所提供医疗信息的理解和提高满意度方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient comprehension of oncologic surgical procedures using 3D printed surgical planning prototypes

Patient comprehension of oncologic surgical procedures using 3D printed surgical planning prototypes

Purpose

Patient understanding of complex surgical procedures and post-intervention consequences is often poor. Little is known about the effectiveness of 3D printed models to improve the comprehension of the medical information provided to patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if 3D printed patient-specific anatomical models could help improve patients’ satisfaction and understanding of complex oncological surgical procedures, their risks, benefits, and alternatives.

Basic procedure

A randomized, controlled crossover experiment was performed, where subjects were randomly assigned to different treatments of the study. This experiment involved teenage patients experts from Kids Barcelona, a Young Person's Advisory Group. The team (n = 14, age range 14–20, 9 females and 5 males) was divided into two groups involved in two simulated pre-surgical outpatient visits for complex oncologic surgical procedures: a high-risk stage 4 abdominal neuroblastoma, and a biliary tract rhabdomyosarcoma. Two senior oncologic surgeons participated in the study by performing the structured outpatient pre-surgical visit. Each participant received information before the study explaining the study methodology and was given a questionnaire.

Main findings

Data analysis of the group using the 3D printed model for the neuroblastoma case showed better results than without the 3D model. On the other hand, conversely, on the data analysis of the rhabdomyosarcoma case with the 3D printed model no better results were observed as compared to the case of not using a 3D model. However, the results of the participants’ knowledge were still better than before the intervention. Satisfaction was significantly better with a 3D model in both cases.

Conclusion

The use of 3D physical models improves the patient's knowledge and shows the effectiveness of 3D printed models to enhance the comprehension of the medical information provided to patients and improve satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of 3D printed medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Medicine and Dentistry (General), Materials Science (General)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
131 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信